Glass v. Stewart Title Guar. Co., 73394
Decision Date | 17 February 1987 |
Docket Number | No. 73394,73394 |
Parties | GLASS et al. v. STEWART TITLE GUARANTY COMPANY. |
Court | Georgia Court of Appeals |
Brian A. Boyle, Atlanta, for appellants.
Robert O. Smith, Arthur L. Myers, Jr., R. Keegan Federal, Jr., Atlanta, for appellee.
Plaintiff/appellee brought this declaratory judgment action to determine its rights and duties under a title insurance binder issued to defendants/appellants. Defendants had called upon plaintiff to defend them in a suit brought against them by one Sherrill Y. Wilson, who asserted that her signature on defendants' warranty deed had been forged. Defendants bring this appeal from the trial court's entry of summary judgment in favor of plaintiff and the denial of their cross-motion for summary judgment.
The trial court found that the following facts were undisputed:
On the basis of the record before it, the trial court concluded that the issue presented was one of construing the contract represented by the binder. The court found that
1. "A contract of title insurance is an agreement whereby the insurer, for a valuable consideration, agrees to indemnify the assured in a specified amount against loss through defects of title to real estate, wherein the latter has an interest, either as purchaser or otherwise...." Beaullieu v. Atlanta Title etc., Co., 60 Ga.App. 400, 404, 4 S.E.2d 78 (1939); OCGA § 33-7-8. National Mtg. Corp. v. American Title Ins. Co., 299 N.C. 369, 374, 261 S.E.2d 844 (1980). Clearly, title insurance presupposes an insurable interest of some kind by the party seeking coverage.
As a condition precedent to coverage in the case at bar, the binder plainly required defendants to obtain a warranty deed in their names and "executed Kristal Yvette Wilson Price Johnson and Sherrill Y. Wilson." Compare Baker Mtg. Corp. v. Hugenberg, 145 Ga.App. 528(1), 244 S.E.2d 56 (1978), wherein the loan commitment contract did not state explicitly that the borrowers must have fee simple title to the property which was to be the security for the loan. " " State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co. v. Sargent, 162 Ga.App. 127, 128, 290 S.E.2d 326 (1982). Notwithstanding the pendency of Sherrill Wilson's suit against defendants to quiet title, the parties here are in apparent agreement that Wilson's signature on the subject warranty deed is, in fact, a forgery. Wutzke v. Bill Reid Painting Svc., 151 Cal.App.3d 36, 43, 198 Cal.Rptr. 418 (1984); Luther v. Clay, 100 Ga. 236(4), 28 S.E. 46 (1897). ...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Plantation Pipe Line Co. v. Stonewall Ins. Co.
...excess insurers and none believed that the claims at issue might exceed the threshold of coverage.).10 Glass v. Stewart Title Guaranty Co., 181 Ga.App. 804, 805(1), 354 S.E.2d 187 (1987) ("In the case of a condition precedent, the condition must be performed before the contract becomes abso......
-
Auto-Owners Ins. Co. v. Xytex Tissue Servs., LLC
...KHD Deutz of Am. Corp. v. Utica Mut. Ins. Co., 220 Ga.App. 194, 469 S.E.2d 336, 338 (1996) (quoting Glass v. Stewart Title Guar. Co., 181 Ga.App. 804, 354 S.E.2d 187, 189 (1987) ).The Policy's Commercial General Liability Conditions section provides that the insured is required to "notify u......
-
CHICAGO TITLE INS. v. CITIZENS AND SOUTHERN NAT.
...defects in or encumbrances on title which are in existence at the time the insured takes his title. Glass v. Stewart Title Guaranty Co., 181 Ga.App. 804, 805, 354 S.E.2d 187 (1987). As title insurance contracts are contracts of indemnity, they are subject to the same rules of construction a......
-
KHD Deutz of America Corp. v. Utica Mut. Ins. Co., Inc.
...contract becomes absolute and obligatory upon the other party." (Citations and punctuation omitted.) Glass v. Stewart Title Guaranty Co., 181 Ga.App. 804, 805(1), 354 S.E.2d 187 (1987). Although the issue of whether or not conditions precedent to coverage requiring the insured to cooperate ......
-
Insurance - Stephen M. Schatz, Stephen L. Cotter, and Bradley S. Wolff
...2003)). 171. 288 Ga. 312, 702 S.E.2d 851 (2010). 172. O.C.G.A. § 33-7-8 (2000). 173. Keyingham, 288 Ga. at 313, 702 S.E.2d at 853. 174. 181 Ga. App. 804, 354 S.E.2d 187 (1987). 175. Keyingham, 288 Ga. at 313, 702 S.E.2d at 852-53. 176. Id. at 313, 702 S.E.2d at 853 (quoting Keyingham Invs.,......
-
Insurance - Bradley S. Wolff, Stephen L. Cotter, and Stephen M. Schatz
...288. 298 Ga. App. 467, 680 S.E.2d 442 (2009). 289. Id. at 468, 680 S.E.2d at 443. 290. Id. 291. Id. at 468-69, 680 S.E.2d at 443. 292. 181 Ga. App. 804, 354 S.E.2d 187 (1987). 293. Keyingham, 298 Ga. App. at 470, 680 S.E.2d at 444. 294. Id. at 468, 470-71, 680 S.E.2d at 443, 444. 295. Id. a......