Glenn v. State

Decision Date06 December 1902
Citation71 S.W. 254
PartiesGLENN v. STATE.
CourtArkansas Supreme Court

Appeal from circuit court, Faulkner county; Geo. M. Chapline, Judge.

Jim Glenn was convicted of involuntary manslaughter, and appeals. Affirmed.

Geo. W. Murphy, Atty. Gen., for the State.

HUGHES, J.

Jim Glenn, the appellant, was indicted for murder in the first degree, and was tried and convicted of involuntary manslaughter, and sentenced to one year in the penitentiary. He moved for new trial, which was overruled. He excepted and appealed to this court.

After S. A. Castleberry was accepted as a juror, the prosecuting attorney asked and was permitted to re-examine him. The court pronounced him competent, and the prosecuting attorney was then, over the appellant's objection, permitted to challenge him peremptorily. The defendant had not exhausted his challenges. There was no error in this. Caldwell v. State, 69 Ark. 322, 63 S. W. 59.

In instructing the jury, the court gave an instruction upon involuntary manslaughter. The appellant killed Tom Glaser by cutting him twice with a knife. It was wrong to instruct on involuntary manslaughter, as there was no evidence of involuntary manslaughter in the case. Acting upon this instruction, the jury found the defendant guilty of involuntary manslaughter, and gave him six months in the penitentiary, while, in our opinion, the proof strongly tends to show he was guilty of voluntary manslaughter. But notwithstanding, the judgment must be affirmed. The practice of giving instructions upon degrees of crime, when there is no evidence to warrant such instructions, is calculated to mislead the jury and work prejudice. It should be avoided.

To continue reading

Request your trial
1 cases
  • Kurck v. State
    • United States
    • Arkansas Supreme Court
    • November 12, 1962
    ...the court inures to the advantage of a defendant, he cannot be heard to complain. Bruce v. State, 68 Ark. 310, 57 S.W. 1103, Glenn v. State, 71 Ark. 86, 71 S.W. 254. In addition, it does not appear from the transcript that appellant exhausted his peremptory challenges. This, in itself, woul......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT