Glenn v. Western Union Telegraph Co.

Decision Date02 March 1907
Docket Number67.
Citation58 S.E. 83,1 Ga.App. 821
PartiesGLENN v. WESTERN UNION TELEGRAPH CO.
CourtGeorgia Court of Appeals

Syllabus by the Court.

As a wife cannot maintain an action to recover the earnings of her husband, it follows that she cannot recover damages for wages or salary he might have earned but for a defendant's tort or negligence. Consequently an allegation that "by reason of defendant's negligence aforesaid she was specially injured and damaged *** the amount of his salary for 12 1/2 months as a member of the police force, which her husband would have received and contributed to the support of his family *** but for the defendant's negligence aforesaid," was properly stricken on demurrer.

Under the decisions in Chapman v. Western Union Telegraph Company, 15 S.E. 901, 17 L.R.A. 430, 30 Am.St.Rep. 183 88 Ga. 763, and Giddens v. Western Union Telegraph Company, 35 S.E. 638, 111 Ga. 824, there can be no recovery in this state for mere mental pain and anguish; and this court is bound by these decisions. This court, however does not, on principle, approve the doctrine therein, but yields to these decisions only because by law it is obliged so to do, and respectfully suggests legislation upon this subject.

[Ed Note.-For cases in point, see Cent. Dig. vol. 15, Damages, § 100.]

It was error to sustain a general demurrer to, and dismiss, a petition which set forth a breach of contract implied from public duty on the part of defendant, and which, if proved would entitle the plaintiff to recover nominal damages, if no more.

Error from City Court of Macon; Hodges, Judge.

Action by Mattie J. Glenn against the Western Union Telegraph Company. Judgment for defendant. Plaintiff brings error. Reversed.

Nottingham & McClellan, for plaintiff in error.

Joseph H. Hall and Warren Roberts, for defendant in error.

RUSSELL J.

The plaintiff in error filed the following petition:

"Mattie J. Glenn, hereinafter designated as 'plaintiff,' against the Western Union Telegraph Company, hereinafter designated as 'defendant,' brings this complaint and to this honorable court respectfully showeth as follows, to wit:

"(1) Defendant is a corporation engaged in the operation of a system of telegraph lines through various sections of this country, embracing, among other fields covered, the territory in, through, and from the cities of Macon, state of Georgia, to Memphis, state

of Tennessee, and was such corporation and so engaged on the occasion and dates hereinafter named.

"(2) The business of defendant as it so was on the dates hereinafter specified is the immediate transmission and delivery of intelligence from point to point on its various lines by electricity; said defendant holding itself out to the public as undertaking, for hire at such rates and charges as it fixed, to promptly transmit and deliver such messages as may be delivered to it.

"(3) Defendant is and was, on dates and occasions hereinafter named, conducting its said business in said county of Bibb, state of Georgia, aforesaid, and has, and on said dates and occasions had, in said state and county an agent, an agency, and a place of business.

"(4) Defendant has injured and damaged plaintiff in the full sum and amount of $3,000, in manner and form and by reason of facts hereinafter set forth, for that:

"(5) For many years prior to the 18th day of July, in the year 1903, plaintiff, together with her husband, R. E. Glenn, her children, and her mother, was a resident citizen of the city of Macon aforesaid, where her said family lived happily, being lovingly provided for by her said husband, his only source of revenue being his position as a member of the police force of said city, at a monthly salary of $70; said income being the only means of living possessed by said family.

"(6) On said last-named date her said husband, in a remarkable and unusual spirit of anger, left his home and family; and for a period of about nine months remained so absented.

"(7) Two days after her said husband's departure, plaintiff received through defendant, by its messenger boy, a telegram from her husband, of which the following is a copy: 'Memphis, Tenn., July 20, 1903. Mrs. R. E. Glenn, 202 Cole St., Macon, Ga. Have just gotten right see mayor about job, answer at my expense care Western Union Telegraph Co. R. E. Glenn. 2:40 p.m.'
"(8) On the envelope inclosing said message was written by defendant's agent in said Macon, Ga., these words: 'Please send reply by bearer.'
"(9) Plaintiff then and there immediately penned the following reply to her husband's said telegram: 'Macon, Ga. July 20, 1903. R. E. Glenn, care Western Union Telegraph Co., Memphis, Tenn. Job all right. Moseley just left and told me so. Been in bed two days. Thank God you are coming. Hun.'
"(10) Plaintiff, having ascertained that her said husband's said position on the police force was still open for him, wrote the above message, as a reply to said message received from him, gave it to the bearing messenger boy, as instructed, to be delivered to the office and agent of defendant in said city of Macon, for transmission to her said husband.
"(11) Plaintiff confidently expected her said husband to immediately return home upon receipt of her said message answering his; but as the days wore on, and after her husband, as she has since learned, had left Memphis in despair of any reconciliation with her, and hopeless of recovering his said position on the police force, to her consternation and horror she discovered that defendant had negligently failed to transmit her said message within a reasonable time, and in time to reach her said husband while he was yet in the city of Memphis, and in fact had utterly failed to transmit, or even start, said message from said Macon office.
"(12) Long thereafter, some nine months, plaintiff, after having vainly inquired by letters, telegrams, and otherwise, for the whereabouts of her said husband, found that he was in Ft. Worth, Tex., where, in the month of March, 1904, she was enabled to reach him with a letter.
"(13) As soon as her said husband received her letter, and as soon as he could recover from an illness that was then upon him, he promptly returned to his home and family in the said of Macon, and in a few months thereafter resumed his position on the police force, as aforesaid.
"(14) Had defendant received her said message he would have promptly returned to his home, family, and position.
"(15) After her husband's final return, plaintiff learned for the first time the exact condition of affairs which had for so long cruelly separated her husband from his home and family; learned, and here charges, that for several days after sending his said message to her, to wit, from Monday, July 20, 1903, to the Thursday following, her said husband had literally haunted the office and agency of defendant in the said city of Memphis, visiting same several times day and night, vainly inquiring for an answer to his said message, for which he had prepaid the charges, and finally, in despair of both reconciliation with her and recovering his position in said city of Macon, had gone to other parts of the country in search of work.
"(16) Plaintiff here charges defendant with negligence in failing to transmit her said message to her husband, and charges that said negligence was the proximate cause of depriving her of the companionship, protection, and support which her said husband afforded her and her family when with them.
"(17) Plaintiff charges that the negligence of defendant aforesaid was the direct and proximate cause of her husband's failing to return to his home and family, and his failing to have and hold his said position on the police force of Macon, from the said 20th day of July, 1903, to about the first part of August, 1904, when he was restored to his said position.
"(18) Plaintiff shows that the conduct of defendant, in failing to transmit her said message, which was delivered to defendant about 3 p. m. on the said 20th day of July, 1903, was attended with aggravating circumstances, for which she asks exemplary damages, in addition to the general and special damages she is entitled to recover, under the law and facts.

"(19) Plaintiff shows that the circumstances show that defendant was abundantly put upon notice of the purpose and importance of her message, both to her husband and herself, and submits, as part of the facts bringing home said notice to defendant, the prepayment by her husband of the charge of transmitting her said answer, his information to defendant's agent at Memphis at the time of its importance, the message to her on envelope as aforesaid, and the very wording of her message, as well as the wording of both her husband's and her message.

"(20) Plaintiff shows that because of the negligent conduct of defendant she was forced to endure all the pain and humiliation of an enforced separation from her husband for the long period of time aforesaid, was forced to endure the hardships incident to the withdrawal of his support and his protection of his family, and to endure many other painful things necessarily incident to such a condition of affairs.

"(21) By reason of this absence of her husband, brought about by defendant's negligence as aforesaid, plaintiff was forced to work and struggle to furnish to herself and family that provision and maintenance always theretofore afforded by her husband. Plaintiff, being unused to work of the character she was forced to resort to, in her distressing condition necessarily suffered great humiliation from the bare fact of the necessity.

"(22) In the effort to properly provide for her children during said absence of their father, she was forced to live for a time separate and apart from...

To continue reading

Request your trial
1 books & journal articles

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT