Glens Falls Ins. Co. v. American Oil Co.

Decision Date05 June 1969
Docket NumberNo. 203,203
PartiesGLENS FALLS INSURANCE COMPANY v. AMERICAN OIL COMPANY.
CourtMaryland Court of Appeals

Alva P. Weaver, III and Robert P. Schlenger, Baltimore, (Lord, Whip, Coughlan & Green, Baltimore, on the brief), for appellant.

Lloyd J. Hammond, Towson (George Barrett Johns, James Temple Smith, Jr. and Smith, Bottom & Smith, Towson, on the brief), for appellee.

Before HAMMOND, C. J., and MARBURY, BARNES, McWILLIAMS, FINAN and SINGLEY, JJ.

BARNES, Judge.

This appeal presents for the first time in this Court the question of whether or not an insurer in the usual type of automobile liability policy may, in an action by a third party seeking indemnity under the policy, raise a defense of non-coverage based on an intentional, non-accidental act by the insured, subsequent to a judgment in favor of the third person against the insured in an action in which the declaration declared in negligence and in which the insurer was not a party and did not defend.

As the court below directed a verdict against the appellant, Glens Falls Insurance Company (Glens Falls), we must assume that Glens Falls could have proved the following facts, as alleged, to be true.

On December 29, 1964, at approximately 7:10 p. m., Mrs. Hilda P. Jordan, after returning home from her work, requested her husband, Leonard J. Jordan, to drive her to their daughter's home in Baltimore County not far from the residence of the Jordans. While proceeding to the daughter's home, Mr. Jordan told his wife that he would 'run you into these trees.' Mrs. Jordan said, 'Well, you cannot do it without hurting yourself.' Mr. Jordan kept on driving and when he approached the daughter's home, he refused to stip, proceeded to the end of Bond Avenue at its intersection with Reisterstown Road. Mrs. Jordan attempted to leave the automobile when Mr. Jordan failed to stop at the stop sign requiring motorists to stop on Bond Avenue before entering Reisterstown Road, but was unable to get out because the handle on the car door was broken. A short distance from Bond Avenue on Reisterstown Road was a gasoline filling station of American Oil Company, the appellee (American). After entering Reisterstown Road, Mr. Jordan stated that he would run into the tanks of the American gas station which he proceeded to do. After striking the gas tanks the automobile driven by Mr. Jordan turned over on its left side and caught fire. The impact had thrown the Jordans to the back seat. Mrs. Jordan wound the window down on the rear right side, whereupon Mr. Jordan pushed her aside and got out himself. Dan Burgess, the lessee of the American gas station responded to Mrs. Jordan's cries for help, climbed upon the burning vehicle and helped Mrs. Jordan to get out.

Officer Cookerly of the Baltimore County Police Bureau arrived at the scene shortly after the occurrence. He testified that when he arrived both Mr. and Mrs. Jorda were out of the automobile, although he later stated that both of the Jordans were in his vehicle when he questioned Mr. Jordan in regard to how the occurrence took place. He testified that Mr. Jordan said that he lost control of the automobile and ran into the gas tanks and further that Mrs. Jordan did not dispute the account of the occurrence. Mrs. Jordan denied that she was present at the first alleged interview and testified that as soon as she regained her senses from the shock of the impact and the other circumstances, she immediately walked to her daughter's home which was only about a block away. Mr. Burgess stated in his testimony that he did not recall seeing Mrs. Jordan at the gas station after he had jumped down from the burning vehicle.

She testified that when the officer asked her if she needed medical attention, she indicated that she did not. The reason she did not tell the officer then what she later told him was: 'I was too confused at that moment.' She said she was 'upset,' and she 'did not say anything.'

During the morning of January 4, 1965, Mrs. Jordan called the police and talked with Officer Cookerly and told him that her husband had intentionally driven his automobile into the gas tanks on December 29 in order to kill her. This was verified by Officer Cookerly's testimony. She testified that her husband suffered from multiple sclerosis, was under active medical treatment, but she did not observe anything unusual about him when he returned home from his work on December 29. She testified that she called the police on January 4 'to see if they could get him out of the house. He had been in the house all that week, and I knew he was either sick or needed attention at the time, because he had been there a week almost.' She then gave Officer Cookerly a statement in regard to the happening of the occurrence at that time.

Officer Armacost went to the Jordan home later on January 4 and at approximately 11:58 a. m. found Mr. Jordan dead with a coat hanger around his neck. Mrs. Jordan was interviewed later in the afternoon of January 4 at the Reisterstown police station and she gave Officer Fielding at that time the same version of the happening of the occurrences of December 29, 1964, as she gave in her testimony in the Circuit Court for Baltimore County on April 29, 1968.

American filed an action on June 15, 1966, against the administrator of Mr. Jordan's estate in the People's Court of Baltimore County and gave Glens Falls Insurance Company, Mr. Jordan's insurer and appellant in this case, notice of the filing of the action. On August 23, 1966, American took a judgment by default against the defendant administrator. This judgment was made absolute in favor of American against the administrator of Mr. Jordan's estate on August 23, 1966. In the declaration filed in this People's Court action, it was alleged in relevant part:

'(T)hat on said date, Defendant's decedent was operating a motor vehicle owned by him in a northerly direction on Reisterstown Road, and did then and there carelessly, recklessly and in a negligent manner cause said vehicle to leave the traveled portion of the highway and to strike and run into the property owned by the Plaintiff; that the Defendant's decedent, Leonard J. Jordan, was negligent in that he was operating his vehicle at a high and improper speed in the circumstances then and there prevailing, failed to stop or divert the course of his vehicle and to avoid colliding with the Plaintiff's property when in the exercise of due care he could and should have done so, and the Defendant's decedent was otherwise careless, reckless and negligent; and the Plaintiff further says that all of its losses and damages were directly caused by the negligence of the Defendant's decedent without any negligence on the part of the Plaintiff thereunto directly contributing.' 1

American, on November 25, 1966, issued a writ of fieri facias on the judgment against the administrator of Mr. Jordan's estate and the Sheriff made a return of nulla bona on November 30. Thereafter American made demand upon Glens Falls to pay the judgment, interest and costs and payment not being forthcoming, filed the present action in the Circuit Court for Baltimore County to recover the amount of the People's Court judgment. Glens Falls defended on the ground that there was no coverage under the automobile liability insurance policy in which Mr. Jordan was the insured and that the loss described in the declaration did not happen through any negligence of Mr. Jordan, the decedent.

After taking testimony, hearing argument and considering trial memoranda, the Circuit Court (Junifer, J.) filed a written opinion in which the trial court indicated that the insurer, having received notice of the action and having failed to participate, was concluded by the judgment in the People's Court action and was estopped by that judgment from raising the question of coverage in the pending case. The trial court entered a judgment absolute in favor of American against Glens Falls on July 25, 1968, for $2,359 with interest from August 23, 1966. A timely appeal was taken from that judgment by Glens Falls to this Court.

Two questions were briefed and argued before us on this appeal:

1. Did the trial court err in ruling that the insurer, Glens Falls, was estopped by the judgment in the People's Court from raising the question of coverage under the insurance policy because the property damage of American resulted from intentional, non-accidental conduct of the insured?

2. Was the evidence before the trial court sufficient to establish coverage under the policy to pay for property damage caused by the insured's negligence?

The trial court did not find it necessary, in view of its opinion that Glens Falls was estopped by the People's Court judgment from raising the question of coverage because of intentional, non-accidental damage, to pass upon the second question. Inasmuch as there is conflicting evidence and inferences in regard to the second question, we will remand the case to the trial court to try the second issue because we are of the opinion that the trial court was in error in its ruling on the first question. See Maryland Rule 874a.

The policy issued by Glens Falls to Mr. Jordan, the insured, provides in relevant part, as follows:

'INSURING AGREEMENTS

'I. * * *

'Coverage B-Property Damage Liability: To pay on behalf of the insured all sums which the insured shall become legally obligated to pay as damages because of injury to or destruction of property, including the loss of use thereof, caused by accident and arising out of the ownership, maintenance or use of the automobile. (Emphasis supplied.)

'II. Defense, Settlement, Supplementary Payments: With respect to such insurance as is afforded by this policy for bodily injury liability and for property damage liability, the company shall:

'(a) defend any suit against the insured alleging such injury, sickness, disease or destruction and seeking damages on account...

To continue reading

Request your trial
30 cases
  • Aetna Cas. & Sur. Co. v. Kuhl
    • United States
    • Maryland Court of Appeals
    • August 11, 1983
    ...judgment remedy may be appropriate for determining rights and obligations of parties under insurance policies, Glens Falls Ins. v. Amer. Oil Co., 254 Md. 120, 254 A.2d 658 (1969); World Insurance Co. v. Perry, 210 Md. 449, 124 A.2d 259 (1955), we have also held that a declaratory judgment a......
  • State Farm v. Dehaan
    • United States
    • Court of Special Appeals of Maryland
    • June 5, 2006
    ...Mut. Cas. Co. v. Harris & Brooks, Inc., 248 Md. 148, 150, 235 A.2d 556, 557 (1967); see also Glens Falls Ins. Co. v. American Oil Co., 254 Md. 120, 127, 254 A.2d 658, 662 (1969), and State Farm Mut. Ins. Co. v. Treas, 254 Md. 615, 620, 255 A.2d 296, 298 (1969). After analyzing relevant Mary......
  • Burd v. Sussex Mut. Ins. Co.
    • United States
    • New Jersey Supreme Court
    • July 6, 1970
    ...Duty to Defend under a Liability Insurance Policy,' 114 U.Pa.L.Rev. 734, 739 (1966). We add that Glen Falls Insurance Co. v. American Oil Co., 254 Md. 120, 254 A.2d 658 (Ct.App.1969), deals with the problem as we Our reference to the Glen Falls case requires a discussion of Stefus v. London......
  • Maryland Cas. Co. v. Peppers
    • United States
    • Illinois Supreme Court
    • September 20, 1976
    ...recognized by the courts and writers, with little accord as to the resolution of the problem. (See Glens Falls Insurance Co. v. American Oil Co. (1969), 254 Md. 120, 254 A.2d 658; Harbin v. Assurance Co. of America (10th Cir. 1962), 308 F.2d 748; Magoun v. Liberty Mutual Insurance Co. (1964......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT