Globe Express Co. v. Taylor
Decision Date | 07 February 1916 |
Docket Number | 8411. |
Citation | 61 Colo. 430,158 P. 717 |
Parties | GLOBE EXPRESS CO. v. TAYLOR. |
Court | Colorado Supreme Court |
Rehearing Denied July 3, 1916.
Error to Mesa County Court; Walter S. Sullivan, Judge.
Action by the Globe Express Company against Andrew J. Taylor. Judgment for defendant, and plaintiff brings error. Reversed and remanded, with directions.
In November, 1913, Andrew J. Taylor, defendant in error, ordered from the O'Fallon Supply Company, at Denver, a pump which the company shipped by freight C. O. D. over the Denver & Rio Grande Railroad to Whitewater, a station near Grand Junction, and prepaid the freight charges. At the same time the shipper drew a sight draft on Taylor for the purchase price, plus the freight, which it attached to the invoice and bill of lading. These were sent through the Globe Express Company, plaintiff in error, to G. L. Linscott, its agent who was also the station agent for the railroad company at Whitewater, with directions to deliver the bill of lading to Taylor upon payment of the attached sight draft. Before the express company could deliver the bill of lading, and the railroad company the freight to Taylor, it was necessary that he should pay the amount of the draft. The express agent would then turn over to Taylor the bill of lading, and, upon this being presented to the railroad company, it would deliver the freight to him. On Sunday the 23d, Taylor and his wife were at Grand Junction, where she phoned to Linscott about the shipment, and, upon being informed that it had arrived and of the amount necessary to be paid before it could be delivered, she asked whether he would accept her husband's personal check, and was informed that he could not accept personal checks in payment of freight, but wanted cash. The Taylors then remained in Grand Junction for the purpose of getting currency with which to pay the sight draft, and the next day, Monday the 24th, went to the Mesa County National Bank, of which Orson Adams was president, and where Taylor had some $6,000 on deposit. Taylor had commenced to write a check, when Adams asked him what he was going to do with the money, and, on being informed, remarked that it was not necessary to take the currency to Whitewater, saying:
Adams then had a telephone conversation with J. Stewart, the local railroad agent at Grand Junction, and requested him to arrange to have the freight released and delivered to Taylor saying that if he would bring the bill of lading to the bank the amount to cover the charges would be paid. After this conversation Adams turned to Taylor and said:
'All right, Andy, I will take your money, and you can get the freight.'
Taylor thereupon wrote his personal check for the amount, payable to the Mesa County National Bank, and delivered it to Adams. Contemporaneous with this transaction, and acting on this telephonic communication with Adams, the railroad agent at Grand Junction, with whom Adams had been conversing over the phone, sent the following telegram to Linscott at Whitewater:
.'
To which Linscott replied:
The railroad agent then sent this wire:
In reply to which Linscott telegraphed:
The latter message was received after business hours, and the next forenoon, Tuesday the 25th, the railroad agent at Grand Junction took the message to the bank and presented it to Mr. Adams, who, with the message before him, drew the following bank draft and handed it to the agent:
'Mesa County National Bank.
'Grand Junction, Nov. 25, 1913.
'M. C. N. B.:
'Orson Adams, Prest.
'To First National Bank, Denver, Colorado.'
This was sent to Linscott, who received it on the 26th. The 27th was Thanksgiving Day, and on the 28th the Mesa County National Bank failed to open its doors. The draft went to protest and was never paid, and it is admitted there was no lack of diligence in its presentation. On the 25th, Taylor and his wife drove to Whitewater, and Linscott on the strength of the telegram that a draft would be sent him, delivered the freight. He learned on the morning of the 28th that the bank had failed, and immediately asked Taylor to return the goods or pay for the shipment, which Taylor refused to do. After receiving the draft drawn by the Mesa County National Bank, Linscott on the strength of it purchased a money order from the Globe Express Company at Whitewater to cover the amount due the shipper, sent it to the O'Fallon Supply Company, and forwarded the bank draft to the principal office of the express company at Denver. The express company, having paid the shipper, demanded reimbursement from Taylor, which was refused. It thereupon brought suit against him in the justice court, where the jury returned a verdict for the defendant. From this judgment an appeal was taken to the county court, where upon another trial the verdict was again for the defendant. The county court gave the following instructions:
'(1) This is an action brought by the Globe Express Company against the defendant, Andrew J. Taylor, to recover from defendant the sum of $191.87 due it, as it is claimed, for the delivery to the defendant of a certain bill of lading expressed to Whitewater through the plaintiff for the defendant, and which bill of lading, it is alleged, called for certain goods shipped to the defendant at Whitewater, and which was necessary to be obtained by the defendant before obtaining the goods.
'(2) If you find from the evidence that the defendant, Andrew J. Taylor, received the goods shipped to him at Whitewater, and that the bill of lading therefor was delivered up by the Globe Express Company to the railroad for said goods, and that the said bill of lading was sent to Whitewater on condition that the sum of $191.87 should be paid for it to the express company before being turned over, then you are instructed that the burden of proving payment is on the defendant, and he must show that he made payment by preponderance of the evidence.
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Olson v. Chapman
... ... Co. v. Weidauer & Lansdown Shingle ... Co., 69 Wash. 161, 124 P. 397; Globe Express Co ... v. Taylor, 61 Colo. 430, 158 P. 717; Cranston v ... West Coast ... ...
-
Ford Motor Credit Co. v. Bob Jones Enterprises, Inc.
...depending upon actual payment of the instrument. See First National Bank v. Newton, 10 Colo. 161, 14 P. 428; and see Globe Express Co. v. Taylor, 61 Colo. 430, 158 P. 717. It is, of course, possible for the parties to contract to release a guaranty such as this by the giving of the note, bu......
-
Guy Martin Buick, Inc. v. Colorado Springs Nat. Bank
...1951), aff'd, 196 F.2d 988 (10th Cir.1952); Rhodes v. Industrial Commission, 99 Colo. 271, 61 P.2d 1035 (1936); Globe Express Co. v. Taylor, 61 Colo. 430, 158 P. 717 (1916). See C.R.S.1963, 155--1--103. At the moment Guy Martin Buick delivered the motor vehicle title certificates to Mark II......
-
Bakehouse & Associates, Inc. v. Wilkins, 83CA0414
...431 P.2d 14 (1967). See American Textile Machine Corp. v. United States, 220 F.2d 584 (6th Cir.1955); see also Globe Express Co. v. Taylor, 61 Colo. 430, 158 P. 717 (1916). If the accord is satisfied, the original obligation is discharged under the doctrine of accord and satisfaction. Hinkl......