Glossip v. Gross, No. 14–7955.
| Court | United States Supreme Court |
| Writing for the Court | Justice ALITO delivered the opinion of the Court. |
| Citation | 576 U.S. 863,192 L.Ed.2d 761,135 S.Ct. 2726 |
| Parties | Richard E. GLOSSIP, et al., Petitioners v. Kevin J. GROSS, et al. |
| Docket Number | No. 14–7955. |
| Decision Date | 29 June 2015 |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
682 practice notes
-
Nw. Immigrant Rights Project v. U.S. Citizenship & Immigration Servs., Civil Action No. 19-3283 (RDM)
...relief, [3] that the balance of equities tips in [its] favor, and [4] that an injunction is in the public interest.'" Glossip v. Gross, 576 U.S. 863, 876 (2015) (quoting Winter v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc., 555 U.S. 7, 20 (2008)). "The last two factors merge when the governmen......
-
McKnight v. Bobby, Case No. 2:09-cv-059
...Court has repeatedly upheld lethal injection as a method of execution. Bucklew v. Precythe, 139 S. Ct. 1112 (2019); Glossip v. Gross, 576 U.S. 863 (2015); Baze v. Rees, 553 U.S. 35 (2008). To the extent McKnight seeks to challenge Ohio's method of lethal injection execution, that claim must......
-
Marshall v. Dunn, Civil Action Number 2:15-CV-1694-AKK
...1257, 1261 (11th Cir. 2009) ). Because Claim C "does not attack the validity of [his] conviction or death sentence," Glossip v. Gross , 576 U.S. 863, 135 S. Ct. 2726, 2738, 192 L.Ed.2d 761 (2015), it is due to be denied.D. Marshall asserts in Claim D that Alabama's lethal injection protocol......
-
Barber v. Frakes, 8:20CV282
...against the States. See Manhattan Cmty. Access Corp. v. Halleck, 139 S. Ct. 1921, 1928 (2019) (First Amendment); Glossip v. Gross, 576 U.S. 863, 876 (2015) (Eighth Amendment). The Fourteenth Amendment also contains an Equal Protection Clause and a Due Process Clause. 2. Barber also claims h......
Request a trial to view additional results
669 cases
-
Nw. Immigrant Rights Project v. U.S. Citizenship & Immigration Servs., Civil Action No. 19-3283 (RDM)
...relief, [3] that the balance of equities tips in [its] favor, and [4] that an injunction is in the public interest.'" Glossip v. Gross, 576 U.S. 863, 876 (2015) (quoting Winter v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc., 555 U.S. 7, 20 (2008)). "The last two factors merge when the governmen......
-
McKnight v. Bobby, Case No. 2:09-cv-059
...Court has repeatedly upheld lethal injection as a method of execution. Bucklew v. Precythe, 139 S. Ct. 1112 (2019); Glossip v. Gross, 576 U.S. 863 (2015); Baze v. Rees, 553 U.S. 35 (2008). To the extent McKnight seeks to challenge Ohio's method of lethal injection execution, that claim must......
-
Marshall v. Dunn, Civil Action Number 2:15-CV-1694-AKK
...1257, 1261 (11th Cir. 2009) ). Because Claim C "does not attack the validity of [his] conviction or death sentence," Glossip v. Gross , 576 U.S. 863, 135 S. Ct. 2726, 2738, 192 L.Ed.2d 761 (2015), it is due to be denied.D. Marshall asserts in Claim D that Alabama's lethal injection protocol......
-
Barber v. Frakes, 8:20CV282
...against the States. See Manhattan Cmty. Access Corp. v. Halleck, 139 S. Ct. 1921, 1928 (2019) (First Amendment); Glossip v. Gross, 576 U.S. 863, 876 (2015) (Eighth Amendment). The Fourteenth Amendment also contains an Equal Protection Clause and a Due Process Clause. 2. Barber also claims h......
Request a trial to view additional results
13 books & journal articles
-
THE REASONABLENESS OF THE "REASONABLENESS" STANDARD OF HABEAS CORPUS REVIEW UNDER THE ANTITERRORISM AND EFFECTIVE DEATH PENALTY ACT OF 1996.
...139 S. Ct. 1112, 1122 (2019) (quoting STUART BANNER, THE DEATH PENALTY: AN AMERICAN HISTORY 23 (2002)); see also, Glossip v. Gross, 576 U.S. 863, 867 (2015) ("The death penalty was an accepted punishment at the time of the adoption of the Constitution and the Bill of Rights."); Baze v. Rees......
-
CRIMINAL LAW: CAPITAL FELONY MERGER.
...at 708 (Stevens, J., dissenting). (92) It is not clear that any of the Furman problems have actually been solved. See Glossip v. Gross, 135 S. Ct. 2726 (2015)(Breyer, J., dissenting) (cataloging all of the many flaws with the modern death penalty in the United States, including arbitrarines......
-
COURTS, CULTURE, AND THE LETHAL INJECTION STALEMATE.
...research and writing of this Article. Remaining errors are mine. (1.) 139 S. Ct. 1112, 1125(2019). (2.) 553 U.S. 35, 50-51 (2008). (3.) 135 S. Ct. 2726, 2737-38 (4.) See Bucklew, 139 S. Ct. at 1125. (5.) See infra Part I.A. (6.) See infra Part I.B. (7.) See infra Part I.B. (8.) See infra Pa......
-
The Red Tape Curtain: Procedural Requirements for Requests for Alternative Execution Method Shrouding Reevaluation of the Constitutionality of the Death Penalty.
...under 42 U.S.C [section] 1983); see also Baze, 553 U.S. 35 at 41 (explaining method-of-execution claim by petitioners); Glossip v. Gross, 576 U.S. 863, 867 (2015) (questioning constitutionality of execution method in (14.) Glossip, 576 U.S. at 877 (quoting Baze, 553 U.S. at 52) (adopting re......
Request a trial to view additional results