Gloth v. Brusco Equities, LLC, Inc., 2292.

• Decision Date: 25 November 2003
• Docket Number: 2292.
• Citation: 2003 NY Slip Op 18917,1 A.D.3d 294,767 N.Y.S.2d 593
• Parties: ALEXANDER J.P. GLOTH, Appellant, v. BRUSCO EQUITIES, LLC, INC., et al., Respondents.
• Court: New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division

1 A.D.3d 294

767 N.Y.S.2d 593

2003 NY Slip Op 18917

ALEXANDER J.P. GLOTH, Appellant, v. BRUSCO EQUITIES, LLC, INC., et al., Respondents.

2292.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, First Department.

November 25, 2003.

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Harold Beeler, J.), entered January 2, 2003, which granted defendants' motion for summary judgment and dismissed the complaint, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

There is no evidence that defendants had actual or constructive notice of the defective condition that caused plaintiff's injury (see Juarez v Wavecrest Mgt. Team, 88 NY2d 628, 646 [1996]). The court properly disregarded plaintiff's affidavit on the issue of notice since it contradicted his prior deposition testimony and was clearly tailored to create an issue of fact (Phillips v Bronx Lebanon Hosp., 268 AD2d 318, 320 [2000]).

Concur — Nardelli, J.P., Andrias, Rosenberger and Friedman, JJ.