God's Battalion of Prayer Pentecostal Church, Inc. v. Hollander
| Decision Date | 29 March 2011 |
| Citation | 82 A.D.3d 1156,919 N.Y.S.2d 380,2011 N.Y. Slip Op. 02623 |
| Parties | GOD'S BATTALION OF PRAYER PENTECOSTAL CHURCH, INC., appellant-respondent, v. Larry B. HOLLANDER, et al., respondents-appellants, Ropal Construction Corp., et al., respondents. |
| Court | New York Supreme Court |
OPINION TEXT STARTS HERE
Zisholtz & Zisholtz, LLP, Mineola, N.Y. (Gerald Zisholtz and Meng Cheng of counsel), for appellant-respondent.
Wilson Elser Moskowitz Edelman & Dicker LLP, New York, N.Y. (Lauren J. Rocklin of counsel), for respondents-appellants.
Lazarowitz & Manganillo, PLLC, Hempstead, N.Y. (Carl Manganillo of counsel), for respondents Ropal Construction Corp., Charles Cross, and Andrew Paladino.
Rivkin Radler LLP, Uniondale, N.Y. (William M. Savino and Jason B. Gurdus of counsel), for respondents Paul Alongi and AXA Global Risks U.S. Insurance Company, as successor to Colonia Insurance Company.
In an action, inter alia, to recover damages for a violation of Judiciary Law § 487 and fraud, the plaintiff appeals (1), as limited by its brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Warshawsky, J.), entered September 1, 2009, as granted those branches of the separate motions of the defendants Larry B. Hollander, Hollander & Strauss, LLP, and Hollander & Strauss, as successor to Hollander, Strauss & Mastropietro, LLP, the defendants Ropal Construction Corp., Charles Cross, and Andrew Paladino, and the defendants Paul Alongi and AXA Global Risks U.S. Insurance Company, as successor to Colonia Insurance Company, which were pursuant to CPLR 3211(a) to dismiss the complaint insofar as asserted against each of them and (2) from a judgment of the same court dated October 14, 2009, which, upon the order, is in favor of the defendants and against it dismissing the complaint, and the defendants Larry B. Hollander, Hollander & Strauss LLP, and Hollander & Strauss, as successor to Hollander, Strauss & Mastropietro, LLP, cross-appeal from so much of the same judgment as, upon so much of the order entered September 1, 2009, as denied their cross motion for an award of sanctions against the plaintiff and its counsel, failed to award them sanctions, and (3) the defendants Larry B. Hollander, Hollander & Strauss, LLP, and Hollander & Strauss, as successor to Hollander, Strauss & Mastropietro, LLP, separately appeal from so much of an order of the same court entered November 16, 2009, as denied their second cross motion for an award of sanctions against the plaintiff and its counsel based upon conduct of the plaintiff and its counsel occurring subsequent to September 1, 2009.
To continue reading
Request your trial
- Metered Appliances, Inc. v. Lafayette Court Apartment Corp.
-
Freiman v. Jm Motor Holdings Nr 125–139 Llc
... ... Petrocelli Elec. Co., Inc., 73 A.D.3d 714, 715, 900 N.Y.S.2d 412; Devany v ... ...
-
Doscher v. Mannatt, Phelps & Phillips, LLP
...v. Hollander, 24 Misc.3d 1250[A], 2009 N.Y. Slip Op. 51939[U], *7–9, 2009 WL 2960629 [Sup.Ct., Nassau County 2009], affd. 82 A.D.3d 1156, 919 N.Y.S.2d 380 [2d Dept.2011], lv. denied 17 N.Y.3d 714, 2011 WL 5041569 [2011] ). Contrary to plaintiff's contention, the arbitration award constitute......
-
Mortg. Elec. Registration Sys., Inc. v. McVicar
...Church, Inc. v. Hollander, 24 Misc.3d 1250[A], 2009 N.Y. Slip Op. 51939[U], 2009 WL 2960629 [Sup. Ct., Nassau County], affd 82 A.D.3d 1156, 919 N.Y.S.2d 380 ; cf. Kimbrook Rte. 31, L.L.C. v. Bass, 147 A.D.3d 1508, 1509–1510, 47 N.Y.S.3d 203 ). In opposition to the third-party defendants’ pr......