Godbey v. Barton

Decision Date17 January 1939
Docket NumberCase Number: 28139
PartiesGODBEY v. BARTON et ux.
CourtOklahoma Supreme Court
Syllabus

¶0 LANDLORD AND TENANT--Nonliability of Landlord for Injuries to Tenant and Family Caused by Defects in Premises Outside Dwelling House.

Where the right of possession and enjoyment of lands with a dwelling house thereon passes to a lessee, in the absence of fraud or concealment by the lessor as to some defect known to him and unknown to the lessee, the rule of caveat emptor applies, and the lessee takes the premises, exclusive of the dwelling, in whatever condition they may be in, thus assuming all risk of personal injury from defects therein, and the rule applies to other members of the lessee's family.

Appeal from District Court, Rogers County; E. A. Summers, Assigned Judge.

Action by J. W. Barton and wife against C. F. Godbey. Judgment for plaintiffs, and defendant appeals. Reversed and remanded, with directions.

C. B. Holtzendorf, for plaintiff in error.

H. Tom Kight and H. Tom Kight, Jr., for defendants in error.

OSBORN, J.

¶1 This action was instituted in the district court of Rogers county by J. W. Barton and Hazel Barton, hereinafter referred to as plaintiffs, against C. F. Godbey, hereinafter referred to as defendant, to recover damages for the alleged wrongful death of Richard Nelson Barton, infant son of plaintiffs. Issues were joined and the cause tried to a jury. A verdict was returned in favor of plaintiffs. From a judgment on the verdict, defendant has appealed.

¶2 Defendant was the owner of a certain dwelling house located in the city of Claremore. Pursuant to an oral rental contract with defendant, plaintiffs moved on the premises with their family of four children in December, 1932. The following spring, plaintiffs discovered that there was an open cistern on the premises located about 50 feet from the house, which had been concealed by tall weeds. The cistern was about 15 feet deep and about five feet across the top and had about six feet of water in it. On November 18, 1933, the infant child, Richard Nelson Barton, who at that time was of the age of 20 months, fell into the cistern and was drowned. Plaintiffs thereafter continued to occupy the premises until January, 1935. On February 8, 1935, this action was instituted.

¶3 The principal assignments of error are that the trial court erred in overruling the demurrer to the petition and in overruling defendant's motion for an instructed verdict.

¶4 Defendant refers to sections 10926 and 10927, O. S. 1931 (41 Okla. Stat. Ann. secs. 31 and 32), providing that the lessor of a "building" intended for the occupation of human beings must put it into a condition fit for occupation and repair all subsequent dilapidations thereto, except such as were caused by the ordinary negligence of the lessee, and in the event of the failure of the lessor to make such repairs, the lessee should make the same and deduct the expense thereof from the rent. We are referred to a number of authorities construing these statutes and holding that the remedy provided thereby is exclusive, and that a landlord is not liable for personal injuries sustained by an occupant of a building caused by latent defects therein. See Lavery v. Brigance, 122 Okla. 31, 242 P. 239; Lyman v. Cowan, 167 Okla. 574, 31 P.2d 108; Nehring v. Ferguson, 170 Okla. 383, 40 P.2d 1040; Young v. Beattie, 172 Okla. 250, 45 P.2d 470; Alfe v. New York Life Ins. Co., 180 Okla. 87, 67 P.2d 947. It is noted that the statute refers only to "buildings." None of the above-cited authorities deal with latent defects existing on the "premises" outside of the buildings. It is unnecessary to determine in the instant case whether or' not there was a legislative intent that said sections should apply to...

To continue reading

Request your trial

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT