Godley v. Hines
| Decision Date | 13 December 1920 |
| Docket Number | 21236. |
| Citation | 123 Miss. 560,86 So. 516 |
| Court | Mississippi Supreme Court |
| Parties | GODLEY v. HINES, Director General of Railroads. |
On suggestion of error. Sustained in part, and reversed in part.
For former opinion, see 86 So. 289.
Appellee filed a suggestion of error, taking exception, among other things, to the statement of facts contained in the previous opinion, to the effect that " appellant was an employé of the railroad company in the shops of the company at Vicksburg."
This statement in the opinion is erroneous, as it appears from the record in this case that appellant was employed by the Director General of Railroads, and the former opinion is corrected to the extent of showing that fact. Otherwise the suggestion of error is overruled.
Sustained in part, and overruled in part.
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
Aponaug Mfg. Co. v. Carroll
... ... Groome, 52 So. 703, 97 Miss. 201; 2 Labatt, Master & ... Servant, sec. 834; Potera v. City of Brookhaven, 49 ... So. 617, 95 Miss. 774; Godley v. Hines, 86 So. 289, 123 Miss ... The ... transcript shows the superintendent was kept constantly ... informed of the defective ... ...
-
Gulfport Creosoting Co. v. White
...in behalf of appellee. He relies, as he frankly argues, upon the doctrine of res ipsa loquitur and cites with confidence Godley v. Hines, 123 Miss. 560, 86 So. 289, 516; also Mobile, J. & K. C. Railroad Co. v. Hicks, Miss. 273, 46 So. 360, 124 Am. St. Rep. 679; Alabama & V. Railway Co. v. G......