Gold Sun Shipping Ltd. v. Ionian Transport Inc.
| Decision Date | 15 December 1997 |
| Citation | 666 N.Y.S.2d 677,245 A.D.2d 420 |
| Parties | , 1997 N.Y. Slip Op. 10,994 GOLD SUN SHIPPING LIMITED, et al., Appellants, v. IONIAN TRANSPORT INC., et al., Respondents. |
| Court | New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division |
Carney & McKay, Pelham (Patrick C. Crilley and John F. Carney, of counsel), for appellants.
Cardillo & Corbett, New York City (Tulio R. Prieto, of counsel), for respondents.
Before BRACKEN, J.P., and O'BRIEN, THOMPSON and ALTMAN, JJ.
MEMORANDUM BY THE COURT.
In an action, inter alia, to recover damages for fraud, breach of implied contract, and breach of fiduciary duty, the plaintiffs appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Westchester County (Scarpino, J.), entered December 4, 1996, which granted the defendants' motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint.
ORDERED that the order is modified, on the law, by deleting the provision thereof which granted that branch of the defendants' motion which was for summary judgment dismissing the plaintiffs' cause of action to recover damages for breach of implied contract, and substituting therefor a provision denying that branch of the motion; as so modified, the order is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.
The complaint alleges that in April 1989 the defendants wrongfully collected and retained certain insurance proceeds which belong to the plaintiffs. The complaint purports to state causes of action to recover damages for fraud, breach of implied contract, and breach of fiduciary duty. The Supreme Court granted the defendants' motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint holding that the action, in reality, sounded in conversion and therefore was barred by the three-year Statute of Limitations applicable to conversion actions (see, CPLR 214).
The facts set forth in the complaint clearly allege a cause of action to recover damages for conversion (see, Meese v. Miller, 79 A.D.2d 237, 436 N.Y.S.2d 496). Therefore, the three-year Statute of Limitations for conversion is applicable. Since the cause of action alleging fraud was merely incidental to the conversion cause of action, and the only purpose it serves in the complaint is to avoid the Statute of Limitations (see, Brick v. Cohn-Hall-Marx Co., 276 N.Y. 259, 11 N.E.2d 902; Garber v. Ravitch, 186 A.D.2d 361, 588 N.Y.S.2d 163; Powers Mercantile Corp. v. Feinberg, 109 A.D.2d 117, 490 N.Y.S.2d 190), the cause of action alleging fraud was properly dismissed.
The cause of action alleging breach of fiduciary duty and the demand...
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
Malmsteen v. Berdon, Llp
...three-year statute of limitations applicable to injury to property. See N.Y. C.P.L.R. § 214(4); Gold Sun Shipping v. Ionian Transp., 245 A.D.2d 420, 666 N.Y.S.2d 677, 678 (N.Y.App.Div. 1997). Therefore, to the extent plaintiff has any valid claims for unlawful appropriation against Mitnick,......
-
In re Fischer
...920 F.Supp. 553, 556 (S.D.N.Y.1996), aff'd, 105 F.3d 833 (2d Cir.1997); see also Gold Sun Shipping, Ltd. v. Ionian Transp. Inc., 245 A.D.2d 420, 666 N.Y.S.2d 677, 678 (N.Y.App.Div.1997) (where damage remedy is adequate, the shorter statute of limitations governing conversion claims applies ......
-
In re Schick
...v. Ribadeneira, 920 F.Supp. 553, 556 (S.D.N.Y.1996), aff'd, 105 F.3d 833 (2d Cir.1997); see Gold Sun Shipping Ltd. v. Ionian Transp. Inc., 245 A.D.2d 420, 666 N.Y.S.2d 677, 678 (N.Y.App.Div.1997) (where damage remedy is adequate, the shorter statute of limitations governing conversion claim......
-
Wikiert v. City of N.Y.
...in tort, does not change the nature of this claim, which is essentially contractual” (citations omitted) ]; Gold Sun Shipping v. Ionian Transp., 245 A.D.2d 420, 421, 666 N.Y.S.2d 677 [where a complaint alleges facts that support causes of action alleging conversion and breach of an implied ......