Golden v. Golden

Citation230 Ga. 867,199 S.E.2d 796
Decision Date05 September 1973
Docket NumberNo. 28021,28021
PartiesGeorge D. GOLDEN v. Florence Jones GOLDEN.
CourtGeorgia Supreme Court

Walker, Yancey & Gupton, Fred H. Walker, Valdosta, for appellant.

Ed G. Barham, John R. Bennett, Valdosta, for appellee.

Syllabus Opinion by the Court

NICHOLS, Justice.

Florence J. Golden filed an action in which she sought separate maintenance, alimony and child support from her husband, George D. Golden. He filed a cross claim in which he sought a divorce. The jury granted the husband a divorce and awarded alimony and child support to the wife, as well as providing for a property settlement between the parties. The appeal is from the judgment on the jury's verdict and enumerated as error is the amount of alimony awarded, a provision in such verdict providing for an increase or decrease depending upon changes in the husband's income, the failure of such verdict to provide for termination of child support upon the marriage, etc. of the children and the award of attorney fees. Held:

1. Counsel for the appellee former wife having conceded that a reversal is required under cases exemplified by Dobson v. Dobson, 223 Ga. 432, 156 S.E.2d 72, as to attorney fees inasmuch as no hearing was had on such issue until after verdict and such matter was not reserved for further consideration by the trial court, that part of the judgment awarding attorney fees is reversed with direction that such part of the judgment be deleted from the final judgment.

2. An award of alimony or child support based upon a percentage of future income is enforceable and 'net compensation after taxes' is a term subject to a definite determination. See Kitchin v. Kitchin, 216 Ga. 619, 118 S.E.2d 462. Thus, the award of alimony and child support in a fixed amount but subject to automatic increase or decrease in the event of a change in the husband's 'net compensation after taxes' was not error.

3. An award of child support is for the support of the child in lieu of that required by Code § 74-105 (Thomas v. Holt, 209 Ga. 133(2), 70 S.E.2d 595), and in the absence of specific provisions to the contrary terminates when the child reaches majority or marries. When a child reaches majority, the statutory and common law duty of the father to support the child ceases and should a minor marry, the duty of the father to support the child ceases because such child would no longer be a member of the father's household, but would have assumed an inconsistent...

To continue reading

Request your trial
23 cases
  • Marriage of Mahalingam, In re
    • United States
    • Washington Court of Appeals
    • August 31, 1978
    ...Elbinger, 33 Mich.App. 166, 189 N.W.2d 823 (1971); Vollenhover v. Vollenhover, 4 Ill.App.2d 44, 123 N.E.2d 114 (1954); Golden v. Golden, 230 Ga. 867, 199 S.E.2d 796 (1973); Condy v. Condy, 328 Ill.App. 8, 65 N.E.2d 219 (1946); Cf., Viles v. Viles, 316 F.2d 31, 34 (3d Cir. 1963); Foreman v. ......
  • Kern v. Kern
    • United States
    • Florida District Court of Appeals
    • July 12, 1978
    ...v. Briggs, 312 So.2d 762 (Fla. 4th DCA 1975); White v. White, 296 So.2d 619 (Fla. 1st DCA 1974).4 Example given, Golden v. Golden, 230 Ga. 867, 199 S.E.2d 796 (1973); Jenkins v. Jenkins, 233 Ga. 902, 214 S.E.2d 368 (1975); Krone v. Krone, 503 P.2d 359 (Colo.Ct.App. II 1972); Miller v. Mille......
  • McClain v. McClain
    • United States
    • Georgia Supreme Court
    • December 2, 1975
    ...394. However, any such obligation imposed by the decree terminates when the child reaches majority or marries. E.g., Golden v. Golden, 230 Ga. 867, 868, 199 S.E.2d 796.' Jenkins v. Jenkins, 233 Ga. 902(2), 214 S.E.2d 368 (1975), which concerned a jury verdict awarding a college education fo......
  • Hempton v. Hempton, Docket No. 53837
    • United States
    • Court of Appeal of Michigan — District of US
    • February 16, 1983
    ...Stoler v. Stoler, 376 So.2d 253 (Fla.App., 1979), and Fitts v. Fitts, 231 Ga. 528, 202 S.E.2d 414 (1973). But see Golden v. Golden, 230 Ga. 867, 199 S.E.2d 796 (1973). We believe that cases such as Stamp, Branstad, and Brevick are better reasoned. Approval of [122 MICHAPP 10] escalator clau......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT