Goldenberg v. Regional Import and Export Trucking Co., Inc.
Decision Date | 17 April 1996 |
Docket Number | No. 95-0304,95-0304 |
Parties | 21 Fla. L. Weekly D919 Mikhail GOLDENBERG and Irena Goldenberg, Appellants, v. REGIONAL IMPORT AND EXPORT TRUCKING CO., INC., a New Jersey corporation, Karen Geiger, an individual, Jack Trammell, an individual, d/b/a University at Sunrise Exxon and Brian Kolb, an individual, Appellees. |
Court | Florida District Court of Appeals |
Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit, Broward County; W. Herbert Moriarty, Judge.
Dan Cytryn of Law Offices of Dan Cytryn, P.A., Tamarac, for appellants.
Steven B. Sundook of Peters, Robertson, Lax, Parson, Welcher, Mowers & Passaro, P.A., Fort Myers, for Appellees-Regional Import and Karen Geiger.
Christopher Lynch of Angone, Hunter, McClure, Lunch & Williams, P.A., Miami, for Appellees-Trammell and Kolb.
Appellants, Mikhail Goldenberg and Irena Goldenberg (plaintiffs), appeal from a jury verdict in a personal injury action which awarded Mikhail Goldenberg his past and future medical bills, but did not include any intangible damages. We reverse for a new trial because the trial court failed to excuse a juror for cause who had expressed definite biases and prejudices against the particular type of personal injury lawsuit brought by plaintiffs based on her own personal experiences.
Plaintiffs challenged juror Pomerleau for cause. During voir dire examination, this juror had explained that her father was an orthopedic surgeon, Dr. Ian Murphy, who had thus been involved in a lot of accident cases and had been sued for medical malpractice "many times." She also related a personal experience involving her father who had been sued for a car accident by a man who was "fine" until he found out that her father was a doctor. Juror Pomerleau stated that she has learned that "some people are dishonest." It is against this backdrop that the following exchanges have particular meaning:
(Emphasis supplied). The trial court then interjected the following:
With this response, the trial court then allowed plaintiffs' counsel to continue with his questioning:
(Emphasis supplied).
"[I]mpartiality of the finders of fact is an absolute prerequisite to our system of justice." Williams v. State, 638 So.2d 976, 978 (Fla. 4th DCA 1994), review denied, 654 So.2d 920 (Fla.1995). As this court recently reiterated in Montozzi v. State, 633 So.2d 563, 565 (Fla. 4th DCA 1994), "this court applies a 'reasonable doubt' standard to juror qualifications: i.e., if there is a reasonable doubt about a juror's impartiality, then the juror should have been dismissed for cause." See also Williams, 638 So.2d at 978, and cases cited therein; Levy v. Hawk's Cay, Inc., 543 So.2d 1299 (Fla. 3d DCA), review denied, 553 So.2d 1165 (Fla.1989).
In this case, juror Pomerleau expressed a definite bias against individuals with relatively minor injuries who seek damages for pain and suffering. She freely volunteered the opinion that people with minor injuries who sued for pain and suffering were often being dishonest. Even in response to a direct question from the trial court as to whether she could be fair and reasonable under the circumstances, whether the injury suffered was major or minor, juror Pomerleau stated only that she was "a fair person." Thus, juror Pomerleau never indicated she could be fair and impartial.
Defendants rely on Fazzolari v. City of West Palm Beach, 608 So.2d 927 (Fla. 4th DCA 1992), review denied, 620 So.2d 760 (Fla.1993), where jurors spoke about general negative feelings about personal injury litigation, but in the end stated that they could put aside their feelings and judge the case on the facts and law regardless of any feelings they may have had about excessive jury awards. In affirming, this court stated that a "general, abstract bias about a particular class of litigation will not, in itself, disqualify a juror where it appears that the bias can be set aside." Id. at 928 (citing to Montecristi Condominium Ass'n, Inc. v. Hickey, 408 So.2d 671 (Fla. 4th DCA 1981)). The Fazzolari court specifically distinguished the third district's holding in Levy because, unlike the jurors in Levy, the Fazzolari jurors' negative feelings were "not associated with lawsuits against them or their families or with their personal acquaintance with a party or a party's lawyer." 608 So.2d at 928. See also Longshore v. Fronrath Chevrolet, Inc., 527 So.2d 922 (Fla. 4th DCA 1988).
Despite defendants' reliance on Fazzolari, this case is distinguishable. In Fazzolari, the jurors expressed general abstract negative feelings regarding personal injury lawsuits. Their feelings were...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Nash v. General Motors Corp.
...and impartial verdict in the case before her. See Singer v. State, 109 So.2d 7, 24 (Fla.1959); Goldenberg v. Regional Import & Export Trucking Co. Inc., 674 So.2d 761, 764 (Fla. 4th DCA 1996). Similarly, juror Robles' follow-up statement, "I think I could be fair," also fails. Though it app......
-
James v. State, 98-1362.
...excusing the potential juror rather than leaving doubt as to a panel member's impartiality. See Goldenberg v. Regional Import and Export Trucking Co., Inc., 674 So.2d 761 (Fla. 4th DCA 1996); Montozzi v. State, 633 So.2d 563 (Fla. 4th DCA Even though potential juror Parker did not admit dir......
-
Bell v. Greissman, 4D03-2743.
...there is reasonable doubt about the juror's impartiality, the juror should be dismissed for cause. Goldenberg v. Reg'l Import & Export Trucking Co., Inc., 674 So.2d 761 (Fla. 4th DCA 1996). A new trial is required where the trial court denies a challenge for cause based on a juror's equivoc......
-
Four Wood Consulting, LLC. v. Fyne
...should be dismissed for cause. Bell v. Greissman, 902 So.2d 846, 847 (Fla. 4th DCA 2005) (citing Goldenberg v. Reg'l Import & Export Trucking Co. Inc., 674 So.2d 761 (Fla. 4th DCA 1996)). Where a juror's responses on a question of bias are conditional or equivocal and the juror is not rehab......
-
Preliminaries
...been excused for cause when none of them were rehabilitated as to their responses. Goldenberg v. Reg’l Import & Export Trucking Co. , 674 So. 2d 761, 764 (Fla. 4th DCA 1996). Efforts at rehabilitating a juror should always be considered in light of what the juror freely said before the salv......
-
Back to the future: how Rodriguez v. Lagomasino got it right in 2008 and why modern voir dire should be guided by 1929's Johnson v. Reynolds.
...member was seated as an alternate and was dismissed prior to deliberations). (29) Goldenberg v. Regional Import and Export Trucking Co., 674 So. 2d 761, 763 (Fla. 4th D.C.A. 1996) (quoting Montozzi v. State, 633 So. 2d 563, 565 (Fla. 4th D.C.A. (30) Examples of this topic, and many others r......
-
An overview of current law impacting jury selection in civil cases.
...feelings are tangible and specific in nature, then a dismissal for cause may be proper. In Goldenberg v. Regional Import and Export, 674 So. 2d 761 (Fla. 4th DCA 1996), a prospective juror exhibited bias against automobile minor impact cases. The trial court noted that these feelings were d......