Golding v. State

CourtFlorida Supreme Court
Writing for the CourtMABRY, J.
CitationGolding v. State, 31 Fla. 262, 12 So. 525 (Fla. 1893)
Decision Date07 March 1893
PartiesGOLDING v. STATE.

Error to circuit court, Suwannee county; John F. White, Judge.

Indictment against Willie Golding for murder in the first degree. A conviction of murder in the second degree was reversed, on appeal. On a second trial, he was motion of murder in the first degree, and, his motion in arrest of judgment being overruled, he brings error. Judgment reversed.

Syllabus by the Court

SYLLABUS

1. The conviction of an accused of murder in the second degree upon an indictment charging him with murder in the first degree has the effect in law to acquit him of the higher offense charged in the indictment, and he cannot legally be put upon trial a second time for the higher offense. Johnson v State, 9 South. Rep. 208, 27 Fla. 245, followed.

2. A motion in arrest of judgment reaches only such defects as are apparent upon the record, but in a case where a judgment rendered has been reversed, and a new trial granted, and a second trial is had upon the same indictment in the same court, the entire proceedings constitute one record, and a motion in arrest of judgment, on the ground of a former acquittal of a higher offense charged in the indictment, will be good where such fact appears upon the record.

COUNSEL J. C. Gallaher, for plaintiff in error.

W. B Lamar, Atty. Gen., for the State.

OPINION

MABRY J.

In February, A. D. 1890, the plaintiff in error was indicted during a term of the circuit court held in Suwannee county for murder in the first degree, and during the same term of the court was convicted of murder in the second degree. Upon a writ of error brought to this court at its June term A. D 1890, the judgment of the circuit court upon the conviction of murder in the second degree was reversed, and a new trial awarded. Golding v. State, 26 Fla. 530, 8 South Rep. 311. Upon the return of the mandate of this court to the Suwannee circuit court, the plaintiff in error was again tried, during a term of court held in February, A. D. 1891, upon the same indictment, and convicted of murder in the first degree, with recommendation to the mercy of the court. A motion in arrest of judgment was made in behalf of the accused, and one of the grounds of this motion is as follows: 'That at the winter term of this court, for the year 1890, the said Willie Golding was tried for the same offense, and not another, and was tried and convicted of murder in the second degree, and was thereby acquitted of murder in the first degree, for which he is now convicted.' This motion was overruled, and the accused sentenced to the penitentiary for life, and the case is again before us by writ of error.

The conviction of...

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex
11 cases
  • Vogel v. State
    • United States
    • Florida Supreme Court
    • May 28, 1936
    ...37, 98 So. 917; Henderson v. State, 55 Fla. 36, 46 So. 151; Caldwell v. People's Bank of Sanford, 73 Fla. 1165, 75 So. 848; Golding v. State, 31 Fla. 262, 12 So. 525; v. State, 100 Fla. 373, 129 So. 827, 131 So. 147; Ephriam v. State, 82 Fla. 93, 89 So. 344; Taylor v. State, 88 Fla. 555, 10......
  • State v. Barry
    • United States
    • North Dakota Supreme Court
    • May 31, 1905
    ... ... convicted of murder in the first degree. Lewis v ... State, 51 Ala. 1; Mitchell v. State, 60 Ala ... 26; Sylvester v. State, 72 Ala. 201; Johnson v ... State, 29 Ark. 31, 21 Am. Rep. 154; Johnson v ... State, 27 Fla. 245, 9 So. 208; Golding v ... State, 31 Fla. 262, 12 So. 525; State v. Helm, ... 92 Iowa 540, 61 N.W. 246; State v. Ross, 29 Mo. 32; ... Jones v. State, 13 Tex. 168, 62 Am. Dec. 550; ... Parker v. State, 22 Tex.App. 105, 3 S.W. 100; ... Smith v. State, 22 Tex.App. 316, 3 S.W. 684; ... State v. Murphy, ... ...
  • Mcnish v. State
    • United States
    • Florida Supreme Court
    • March 8, 1904
    ... ... him in jeopardy a second time for the same offense, within ... the meaning of the Constitution, see Lovett v ... State, 33 Fla. 389, 14 So. 837; Gibson v ... State, 26 Fla. 109, 7 So. 376; Johnson v ... State, 27 Fla. 245, 9 So. 208; Golding v ... State, 31 Fla. 262, 12 So. 525 ... The ... second error assigned is as follows: 'The court erred in ... proceeding with the trial with the jury as impaneled, ... notwithstanding the disqualified juror.' ... Turning ... to the bill of exceptions as set forth in the ... ...
  • West v. State
    • United States
    • Florida Supreme Court
    • March 11, 1908
    ...previously convicted, and to such lower grades of the offense of which he was convicted as may be legally included therein. Golding v. State. 31 Fla. 262, 12 So. 525; Reynolds v. State, 34 Fla. 175, 16 So. 78; Ex Vickery, 51 Fla. 141, 40 So. 77. The defendant having been convicted of mansla......
  • Get Started for Free