Goldstein v. Stone, 57-5
| Decision Date | 22 July 1957 |
| Docket Number | No. 57-5,57-5 |
| Citation | 96 So.2d 227 |
| Parties | Al GOLDSTEIN et al., Appellants, v. Richard B. STONE, Appellee. |
| Court | Florida District Court of Appeals |
H. Irwin Levy, West Palm Beach, for appellants.
Patton & Kanner, Miami, for appellee.
We have examined the record and the briefs of counsel in this cause and heard oral argument at the bar of this Court. It is apparent to the Court upon perusal of the record that the Chancellor below based his findings upon conflicting evidence. We follow the rule so often enunciated by the Supreme Court of this State that 'The findings of a Chancellor based upon conflicting evidence will not be disturbed unless clearly shown to be erroneous.' Cobb v. Cobb, 82 Fla. 287, 89 So. 869; Grantham v. Grantham, 140 Fla. 120, 191 So. 197; Peterson v. Hancock, 146 Fla. 410, 1 So.2d 255; Monyak v. Monyak, Fla., 43 So.2d 903; Town of Howey in the Hills v. Graessle, Fla., 57 So.2d 422, and Loew v. Friedman, Fla., 80 So.2d 672. We find no reversible error in the record and therefore conclude that the cause should be, and it is hereby, affirmed.
CARROLL, CHAS., C. J., and HOR TON and PEARSON, JJ., concur.
To continue reading
Request your trial
- Vandercar v. David
-
Marx v. Goldfinger, 65--730
...Electric Supply, Inc., Fla.App.1964, 161 So.2d 668, and should not be disturbed unless they are clearly erroneous. Goldstein v. Stone, Fla.App.1957, 96 So.2d 227. The appealing party has the burden of demonstrating that the decision is clearly erroneous. Kreedian v. BCK Land, Inc., Fla.App.......
- Donner v. Arkwright Boston Manufacturers Mutual Insurance Company, ARKWRIGHT-BOSTON
-
Erstling v. Trinity Wesleyan Methodist Church
...with another controversy. The appellants having failed to demonstrate error in this finding, it must be affirmed. See Goldstein v. Stone, Fla.App.1957, 96 So.2d 227, and cases cited Affirmed. CARROLL, CHAS., C. J., and HORTON and PEARSON, JJ., concur. ...