Golenbock, Matter of

Decision Date25 May 1961
Citation9 N.Y.2d 971,218 N.Y.S.2d 56
Parties, 176 N.E.2d 508 In the Matter of Jerome GOLENBOCK, An Attorney, Appellant, The Coordinating Committee on Discipline of the Association of the Bar of the City of New York, etc., Respondent.
CourtNew York Court of Appeals Court of Appeals

Appeal from Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, 13 A.D.2d 178, 215 N.Y.S.2d 270.

Disciplinary proceeding against attorney. A motion was filed for an order temporarily suspending the attorney from practice, and the attorney filed a cross motion for relief from default in answering and for leave to serve his answer.

The Appellate Division held that the attorney would be given an opportunity to answer even though his reasons advanced for failure to make prior answer would not have been regarded as sufficient in conventional litigation, but that, where attorney admitted that he had never complied with the requirement that an attorney handling personal injury cases upon a contingent retainer basis should deposit sums received in a special bank account, the attorney would be suspended from practice until final determination of the remaining charges.

The attorney filed a motion in the Court of Appeals for leave to appeal to the Court of Appeals and a motion for a stay.

Motion for a stay denied.

To continue reading

Request your trial

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT