Goley v. State

Decision Date13 December 1888
PartiesGOLEY v. STATE.
CourtAlabama Supreme Court

Appeal from circuit court, Conecuh county; JOHN P. HUBBARD, Judge.

Indictment for the murder of William Luckey for shooting. The defendant among other things, excepted to the refusal of the court to give the following requested instructions: "(1) If the jury find that the state has failed to prove any adequate or sufficient motive for committing the crime charged, they can look at such failure as a strong circumstance tending to show the defendant's innocence. (2) If no motive for the crime is found, this is a very strong circumstance in favor of the defendant's innocence, and as tending to show his innocence. (3) If the jury believe, from the evidence, that the deceased called to the defendant to wait for him on the morning of the shooting, just before the killing, and that the defendant did stop and wait, at the request of the deceased, and that their feelings were friendly towards each other, this is a circumstance the jury may look at, as tending to show that there was no malice, and that the shooting was done accidentally, or by misadventure, and, if they so believe that the killing was the result of an accident or misadventure, they must find the defendant not guilty."

Thos. N. McClellan, Atty. Gen., for the State.

CLOPTON J.

The term of the circuit court of Conecuh county may continue two weeks. On Monday of the second week, which is the week for the trial of criminal cases, the court made an order setting Friday of the same week for the trial of defendant, who was charged with murder, and that the sheriff serve on him a list of the special jurors drawn in open court, "together with those jurors summoned and served on the regular venire of jurors drawn for the second week of said court." The tenth section of the "Act to more effectually secure competent and well-qualified jurors in the several counties of this state, with the exception" of certain named counties, provides "that, when any capital case or cases stand for trial, the court shall, at least one entire day before the same are set for trial, cause the box containing the names of jurors to be brought into the court-room, and, after having the same well shaken, the presiding judge shall then and there publicly draw therefrom not less than twenty-five, nor more than fifty, of said names for each capital case, a list of which shall be immediately made out by the clerk of said court, and an order issued to the sheriff to summon the same to appear upon the day set for trial, in like manner and under like penalties as provided for summoning...

To continue reading

Request your trial
5 cases
  • Hogue v. State
    • United States
    • Arkansas Supreme Court
    • January 17, 1910
    ...Ill. 210; 105 Ill. 417; 92 Ill. 602; 99 Ill. 371; 10 Bush (Ky.) 495; 41 Tex. Cr. App. 252; 52 S.W. 417; 33 P. 791; 27 N.E. 710; 11 So. 915; 5 So. 167; N.W. 213; 61 Neb. 584. 3. The seventh instruction given by the court assumes that there were suspicious circumstances, which was a question ......
  • State v. Meyer
    • United States
    • Iowa Supreme Court
    • June 18, 1917
    ...necessarily depends on the facts and circumstances of each particular case, and should be left for the jury to determine. See Goley v. State, 85 Ala. 333, 5 South. 167. It was enough to direct the jury's attention to the absence of evidence of motive as was done. The instruction was rightly......
  • State v. Meyer
    • United States
    • Iowa Supreme Court
    • June 18, 1917
    ... ... exist without discovery of evidence thereof ...           The ... weight to be attached to presence or absence of motive ... necessarily depends on the facts and circumstances of each ... particular case, and should be left for the jury to ... determine. See Goley v. State, 85 Ala. 333, 5 So ... 167. It was enough to direct the jury's attention to the ... absence of evidence of [180 Iowa 220] motive, as was done ... The instruction was rightly refused ...          The ... sufficiency of the evidence to sustain the conviction is ... ...
  • Woodall v. Kelly
    • United States
    • Alabama Supreme Court
    • December 13, 1888
    ... ... that part of the land in excess of the homestead ... McGuire v. Van Pelt, 55 Ala. 344 ... Whether the defendant, under this state of facts, can remain ... in possession of the premises, and set up this defense so as ... to abate the purchase money, we do not decide. If they ... ...
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT