Gomaco Corp. v. Faith, 88-02398
| Decision Date | 04 August 1989 |
| Docket Number | No. 88-02398,88-02398 |
| Citation | 550 So.2d 482,14 Fla. L. Weekly 1853 |
| Parties | 14 Fla. L. Weekly 1853 GOMACO CORPORATION, Appellant, v. Michael J. FAITH and Bonnie L. Faith, Appellees. |
| Court | Florida District Court of Appeals |
James A. Young of Haas, Boehm, Brown, Rigdon, Seacrest & Fischer, P.A., Tampa, for appellant.
Edward D. Carlson of Carlson, Meissner, Web & Crider, P.A., Clearwater, for appellees.
Appellant, Gomaco Corporation, appeals the final judgment entered pursuant to a jury verdict awarding damages and costs to appellees, Michael J. Faith and his wife, Bonnie L. Faith. We reverse for a new trial on the issues of liability and damages.
Appellee, Michael J. Faith, an employee of Dolphin L & S Company, was operating a curbing machine manufactured by appellant, Gomaco, when he suffered severe injuries resulting in the partial amputation of his foot by subsequent surgery. Appellees' actions against appellant alleged negligence, strict liability and breach of an implied warranty of merchantability. While appellant raises several issues in this appeal, we find merit and therefore reverse for a new trial only in regard to photographs introduced by appellees which we find overwhelmingly prejudicial to appellant.
The offensive photographs introduced by appellees were particularly gruesome and inflammatory pictures of appellee Michael Faith's nearly severed foot taken shortly after the accident and prior to surgery. They were introduced during the testimony of the surgeon who performed the operative procedures on appellee Michael Faith's foot. The photographs were taken prior to surgery at the request of the surgeon who testified that the photographs would assist him in describing to the jury the surgical procedures that were necessary and the extent of the injuries to appellee Michael Faith.
Photographs that are gruesome, offensive and/or inflammatory must be relevant to an issue required to be proved in the case. Welty v. State, 402 So.2d 1159 (Fla.1981). While the photographs may have been tangentially relevant to appellees' case, their relevance is overwhelmingly outweighed by their gruesome and inflammatory nature. § 90.403, Fla.Stat. (1987). The photographs do not in themselves independently establish any material part of appellees' case nor were they necessary to corroborate some disputed factual issue. Because we cannot determine that the highly inflammatory nature of the photographs did not...
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
Hobart Corp. v. Siegle By and Through Hoerber
...131 (Fla.1991); Trees v. K-Mart Corp., 467 So.2d 401 (Fla. 4th DCA), review denied, 479 So.2d 119 (Fla.1985); cf. Gomaco Corp. v. Faith, 550 So.2d 482 (Fla. 2d DCA 1989), review denied, 558 So.2d 18 (Fla.1990). Furthermore, the court's exclusion of evidence of the absence of reported accide......
-
Perez v. State, 91-1548
...the incident. The magazines were not relevant to the issues at trial and, therefore, should not have been admitted. See Gomaco Corp. v. Faith, 550 So.2d 482 (Fla. 2d DCA) (inflammatory photographs must be relevant to issue required to be proved), rev. denied, 558 So.2d 18 (Fla.1989). See al......
-
Faith v. Gomaco Corp.
...18 558 So.2d 18 Faith (Michael J.) v. Gomaco Corporation NO. 74,855 Supreme Court of Florida. FEB 07, 1990 Appeal From: 2d DCA 550 So.2d 482 Rev. ...