Gomes v. Valentine Realty LLC

Decision Date07 September 2006
Docket Number8765N.
Citation2006 NY Slip Op 06369,822 N.Y.S.2d 2,32 A.D.3d 699
PartiesMARGARITA GOMES, Individually and as Mother and Natural Guardian of AUSTIN MATTHEW ESPINDOLA, an Infant, et al., Respondents, v. VALENTINE REALTY LLC et al., Appellants.
CourtNew York Supreme Court — Appellate Division

Defendants substantially complied with Supreme Court's conditional order striking their answer, which required them to provide certain discovery (see Henry v Advance Process Supply Co., 11 AD3d 430 [2004]). Therefore, the conditional order did not become absolute, and Supreme Court erred in striking defendants' answer (cf. D'Aloisi v City of New York, 7 AD3d 750 [2004]).

Supreme Court also erred in denying that aspect of defendants' motion that sought to vacate the note of issue. "At any time, the court . . . may vacate a note of issue if it appears that a material fact in the certificate of readiness is incorrect, or that the certificate of readiness fails to comply with the requirements of this section in some material respect" (22 NYCRR 202.21 [e]; see Simon v City of Syracuse Police Dept., 13 AD3d 1228 [2004]). The certificate of readiness contains multiple, material incorrect assertions, including that all discovery was complete.

Concur—Tom, J.P., Saxe, Friedman, Sullivan and McGuire, JJ.

To continue reading

Request your trial
18 cases
  • People v. Popko
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court — Appellate Term
    • October 19, 2017
  • Perini Corp. v. City of N.Y. (Honeywell St. and Queens Blvd. Bridges)
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court
    • March 16, 2010
    ...certificate of readiness is incorrect, and thus, the motion to vacate the note of issue is granted. ( Gomes v. Valentine Realty LLC, 32 A.D.3d 699, 822 N.Y.S.2d 2 [1st Dept. 2006] [court erred in denying defendant's motion to vacate note of issue as certificate of readiness contained incorr......
  • Beadell v. Eros Mgmt. Realty
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court
    • June 1, 2023
    ... ... discovery is complete, is incorrect (see 22 NYCRR ... 202.21 [e]; Rivers v Birnbaum, 102 A.D.3d 26 [2d ... Dept 2012]; Gomes v Valentine Realty LLC, 32 A.D.3d ... 699 [1st Dept 2006]; Herbert v Sivaco Wire Corp., 1 ... A.D.3d 144 [1st Dept 2003]). Usually, such a ... ...
  • Lopez v. Bendell
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division
    • June 21, 2022
    ...affidavit detailing the process she had undertaken to search her social media post (see 22 NYCRR 202.21[e]; Gomes v Valentine Realty LLC, 32 A.D.3d 699, 700 [1st Dept 2006]; Jackson v City of New York, 185 A.D.2d 768, 769-770 [1st Dept 1992]). In addition, as noted above, we are granting th......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT