Gomez-Mejia v. I.N.S.
| Decision Date | 03 July 1995 |
| Docket Number | P,No. 94-40971,GOMEZ-MEJI,94-40971 |
| Parties | Francisco Eliasetitioner, v. IMMIGRATION AND NATURALIZATION SERVICE, Respondent. |
| Court | U.S. Court of Appeals — Fifth Circuit |
Mark E. Jacobs, Dallas, TX, for petitioner.
Janet Reno, Atty., Gen. Dept. of Justice, Teresa A. Wallbaum, Donald E. Keener, William C. Erb, Mark C. Walters, Attys. Civ. Div., Robert L. Bombough, Div., Office of Immigration Litigation, Washington, DC, John B.Z. Caplinger, I.N.S. Dist. Dir., Joseph Aguilar, New Orleans, LA, for respondent.
Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals.
Before JONES, BARKSDALE and BENAVIDES, Circuit Judges.
Petitioner Francisco Elias Gomez-Mejia ("Gomez-Mejia") appeals a final order of deportation against him by the Board of Immigration Appeals ("BIA"). Finding no reversible error, we affirm.
In 1977, Gomez-Mejia, a citizen of Nicaragua, joined the Sandinista Army and fought in the insurrection that eventually overthrew Anastacio Somoza, a long-standing dictator of Nicaragua. After the Sandinistas came to power and began to implement their communist regime, a civil war ensued between them and anti-communist groups called "Contras." Between 1982 and 1984, Gomez-Mejia fought against the Contras. He was wounded and hospitalized, but soon was ordered to return to combat. In 1987, Gomez-Mejia was assigned the duty of supplying ammunition to a particular unit. The unit, however, received insufficient or degraded ammunition and suffered twenty-nine casualties as a result. Deemed responsible by his superiors, Gomez-Mejia was incarcerated for several days, during which he was kept in an unheated cell in a semi-nude state, despite the cold weather, and was forced to sleep on the pavement. He was eventually released and absolved of the responsibility for the tragedy that befell his unit. Gomez-Mejia soon deserted the army and hid with his family for several months.
On October 23, 1988, Gomez-Mejia entered the United States unlawfully without submitting to inspection by the Immigration and Naturalization Service ("I.N.S."). Shortly thereafter, formal proceedings were initiated against him. Admitting that the charges against him were true, Gomez-Mejia nonetheless argued that he was a refugee and thereby entitled to asylum. Gomez-Mejia contended that he did not flee Nicaragua because of an undue concern for his own safety, but because of his political opinion questioning the continuing viability of the Sandinista cause and his unwillingness to assist the Sandinistas in their suppression of the peasantry. Gomez-Mejia also testified that he objected, on political grounds, to the Sandinista importation of Cuban and Soviet advisors. Gomez-Mejia then testified that he feared reprisals if deported to Nicaragua. Although in April, 1990 a non-communist, Violeta Chamorro, was elected President, the Sandinistas still wield power in the country. Gomez-Mejia testified that he was particularly fearful of Sandinista military intelligence officers who continue to hold their posts after the Chamorro election. Gomez-Mejia also described how Sandinista officers went to his family home to inquire about his whereabouts and cites to a State Department report which concluded that the Sandinista Army continues to maintain a repressive internal security operation.
On April 3, 1990, the Immigration Judge ("IJ") denied Gomez-Mejia his application for asylum. The IJ found that Gomez-Mejia had not proved the possibility of persecution for one of the enumerated factors in the Immigration and Nationality Act ("INA"), but had only demonstrated a possibility of prosecution for desertion:
Having listened to his testimony carefully, it appears to me the only rational basis that he fears to go back has to do with his desertion from the military. He has not indicated that he's likely to be punished or mistreated for his race, religion, nationality, membership in a particular social group or because of his political opinion. Everything hinges on the fact that he deserted the military and left Nicaragua.
The IJ then concluded that Gomez-Mejia was not a refugee:
[I]t seems that this young man had achieved some level of responsibility in the military and then because of an accident or a mistake, soldiers were killed. He was blamed for it, in whole or in part, and within the military he lost status. It does not appear that he was ever persecuted on account of his race, religion, nationality, membership in a particular social group or because of his political opinion.
Under the circumstances I find that at the time he left Nicaragua, while he may have been at some risk of being punished for desertion from the military, he was not at risk [of] persecution on account of his race, religion, nationality, membership in a particular social group or because of his political opinion. He was, thus, not a "refugee["] as defined in Section 101(a)(42)(A) of the Act. I further find that at the time of his hearing on the asylum application he did not demonstrate that he was entitled to relief under Section 208(a) on account of a risk of being persecuted for any of those protected reasons.
Gomez-Mejia appealed the decision to the BIA. The BIA found against Gomez-Mejia and entered a final order of deportation against him.
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
Wilkerson v. Boomerang Tube, LLC
... ... Celotex Corp. v. Catrett , 477 U.S. 317, 323 (1986); Technical Automation Servs. Corp. v. Liberty Surplus Ins. Corp ., 673 F.3d 399, 407 (5th Cir. 2012); QBE Ins. Corp. v. Brown & Mitchell, Inc ., 591 F.3d 439, 442 (5th Cir. 2009). Page 7 "A fact is material ... ...
-
Turco v. Hoechst Celanese Chemical Group, Inc.
... ... 1126 motion." Rosado v. Deters, 5 F.3d 119, 123 (5th Cir.1993) (internal quotation marks omitted) (quoting Reid v. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co., 784 F.2d 577, 578 (5th Cir. 1986)). In this case, Hoechst claims that no genuine issue of material fact exists with respect to any element of ... ...
-
Dupre v. Harris County Hosp. Dist.
... ... § 12112(a); see also Taylor, 93 F.3d at 162; Daigle v. Liberty Life Ins. Co., 70 F.3d 394, 396 (5th Cir.1995); Daugherty v. City of El Paso, 56 F.3d 695, 696 (5th Cir.1995), cert. denied, 516 U.S. 1172, 116 S.Ct ... ...
-
Aka v. Washington Hosp. Center
... ... Cf. partial dissent at 899-900 (citing Rhodes v. Guiberson Oil Tools, 75 F.3d 989, 994 (5th Cir.1996) (en banc), LeBlanc v. Great American Ins". Co., 6 F.3d 836, 843 (1st Cir.), cert. denied, 511 U.S. 1018, 114 S.Ct. 1398, 128 L.Ed.2d 72 (1994), and Malamud, supra, at 2307-11) ... \xC2" ... ...
-
Disability discrimination
..., 161 F.3d at 295; Barber v. Nabors Drilling U.S.A., Inc. , 130 F.3d 702, 709 (5th Cir. 1997); Turco , 101 F.3d at 1094; Daugherty , 56 F.3d at 700 (quoting Chiari , 920 F.2d at 318); Bradley v. University of Tex. M.D. Anderson Cancer Ctr. , 3 F.3d 922, 925 (5th Cir. 1993); see Davis , 442 ......
-
Disability Discrimination
..., 161 F.3d at 295; Barber v. Nabors Drilling U.S.A., Inc. , 130 F.3d 702, 709 (5th Cir. 1997); Turco , 101 F.3d at 1094; Daugherty , 56 F.3d at 700 (quoting Chiari , 920 F.2d at 318); Bradley v. University of Tex. M.D. Anderson Cancer Ctr. , 3 F.3d 922, 925 (5th Cir. 1993); see Davis , 442 ......
-
Disability Discrimination
...161 F.3d at 295; Barber v. Nabors Drilling U.S.A., Inc., 130 F.3d 702, 709 (5th Cir. 1997); Turco, 101 F.3d at 1094; Daugherty, 56 F.3d at 700 (quoting Chiari, 920 F.2d at 318); Bradley v. University of M.D. Anderson Cancer Ctr., 3 F.3d 922, 925 (5th Cir. 1993); see Davis, 442 U.S. at 407-0......
-
Disability Discrimination
..., 161 F.3d at 295; Barber v. Nabors Drilling U.S.A., Inc. , 130 F.3d 702, 709 (5th Cir. 1997); Turco , 101 F.3d at 1094; Daugherty , 56 F.3d at 700 (quoting Chiari , 920 F.2d at 318); Bradley v. University of Tex. M.D. Anderson Cancer Ctr. , 3 F.3d 922, 925 (5th Cir. 1993); see Davis , 442 ......