Gomez v. State, 74--639

Decision Date19 February 1975
Docket NumberNo. 74--639,74--639
PartiesVictor GOMEZ, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
CourtFlorida District Court of Appeals

James A. Gardner, Public Defender, and Durand James Adams, Asst. Public Defender, Bradenton, for appellant.

Robert L. Shevin, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and Robert J. Landry, Asst. Atty. Gen., Tampa, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Apppellant Gomez was convicted of aggravated assault and sentenced to three years in the state prison.

On appeal appellant first questions the sufficiency of the evidence. However, the sufficiency of evidence was not raised for an appellate court to review, appellant having failed to file either a motion for directed verdict or a motion for new trial. State v. Barber, Fla.1974, 301 So.2d 7.

Appellant next contends that the trial court erred in not instructing the jury as to the penalty fixed by law for the offense charged as required by Rule 3.390(a) RCrP. Said rule is not mandatory, only directory. Johnson v. State, Fla.1974, 308 So.2d 38, affirming the view of this court expressed in Johnson v. State, 297 So.2d 35.

Affirmed.

McNULTY, C.J., and HOBSON and GRIMES, JJ., concur.

To continue reading

Request your trial
3 cases
  • Tascano v. State, KK-22
    • United States
    • Florida District Court of Appeals
    • October 18, 1978
    ...1975); Sweet v. State, 313 So.2d 130 (Fla. 2d D.C.A. 1975); Pullman v. State, 311 So.2d 753 (Fla. 3d D.C.A. 1975); Gomez v. State, 309 So.2d 56 (Fla. 2d D.C.A. 1975); Cooper v. Wainwright, 308 So.2d 182 (Fla. 4th D.C.A. 1975); Ballard v. State, 307 So.2d 826 (Fla. 1st D.C.A. 1975); McIntyre......
  • State v. Terry
    • United States
    • Florida Supreme Court
    • February 25, 1976
    ...1975); Ballard v. State, 307 So.2d 826 (Fla.App.1st 1975); Cooper v. Wainwright, 308 So.2d 182 (Fla.App.4th 1975); Gomez v. State, 309 So.2d 56 (Fla.App.2d 1975); Pullman v. State, 311 So.2d 753 (Fla.App.3rd 1975); Sweet v. State, 313 So.2d 130 (Fla.App.2nd 1975); Beamon v. State, 314 So.2d......
  • Labar v. State
    • United States
    • Florida District Court of Appeals
    • July 3, 1991
    ...without violence. Defendant's contention concerning the sufficiency of the evidence was not preserved for appeal. See Gomez v. State, 309 So.2d 56 (Fla. 2d DCA 1975). Defendant's contention that the trial court erred in announcing defendant's guilt before defense counsel made a closing argu......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT