Gonsalves v. State

Decision Date15 November 2002
Docket NumberNo. 2D99-4784.,2D99-4784.
Citation830 So.2d 265
PartiesJoseph GONSALVES, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
CourtFlorida District Court of Appeals

Terrence E. Kehoe of Law Offices of Terrence E. Kehoe, Orlando, for Appellant.

Richard E. Doran, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Anne S. Weiner, Assistant Attorney General, Tampa, for Appellee.

BLUE, Chief Judge.

Joseph Gonsalves appeals his convictions and sentences for leaving the scene of an accident resulting in death and driving with a revoked license and causing a death. We affirm the convictions, reverse the sentences, and remand for resentencing.

The first issue presented in this appeal contends that fundamental error requires a reversal of Mr. Gonsalves' convictions because the record on appeal failed to reflect that the prospective jurors were sworn prior to questioning as required by Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.300(a). The purpose of this oath is to ensure that prospective jurors truthfully answer questions about their qualifications to serve as part of a particular jury. The record on appeal initially lacked any record of this important component of a criminal jury trial. The State subsequently supplemented the record, and we are satisfied that there was compliance with rule 3.300(a). However, difficult problems were presented by this issue because of an apparently common practice in the trial courts to comply with rule 3.300(a) in a common jury pool room but then fail to recite the compliance for the record in each case. In order to make a record on appeal that reflects compliance with rule 3.300(a), we encourage trial judges to include on the record either the swearing of the prospective jurors or to recite that the prospective jurors were properly sworn prior to questioning. See Pena v. State, 829 So.2d 289 (Fla. 2d DCA 2002)

(holding that fundamental error is not established by record that fails to demonstrate whether the venire received the required oath).

We have considered each of Mr. Gonsalves' remaining issues addressed to his convictions and reject them without discussion. Mr. Gonsalves also presented several issues related to his sentences; two of his points warrant discussion and relief.

In the charging information, the State alleged that Mr. Gonsalves drove a motor vehicle with a revoked driver's license and caused "the death of another human being, to wit: J.R. Brown or Ruth Ann Brown." Significantly for Mr. Gonsalves' argument, the information alleged the death of a single human being. Driving with a revoked license and causing the death of another human being is a violation of section 322.35(6), Florida Statutes (1997), a third-degree felony. In preparing the sentencing guidelines scoresheet, victim injury points were included for two deaths. Mr. Gonsalves contends that because the information only charged one death, victim injury points could be included for only one death, not two.

In Apprendi v. New Jersey, 530 U.S. 466, 490, 120 S.Ct. 2348, 147 L.Ed.2d 435 (2000), the United States Supreme Court held: "Other than the fact of a prior conviction, any fact that increases the penalty for a crime beyond the prescribed statutory maximum must be submitted to a...

To continue reading

Request your trial
11 cases
  • Safrany v. State, 2D14–5331.
    • United States
    • Florida District Court of Appeals
    • May 6, 2015
    ...1045 (Fla.2011) ; Melbourne v. State, 679 So.2d 759 (Fla.1996) ; Bizzell v. State, 912 So.2d 386 (Fla. 2d DCA 2005) ; Gonsalves v. State, 830 So.2d 265 (Fla. 2d DCA 2002) ; Wendt v. State, 711 So.2d 1166 (Fla. 2d DCA 1998) (en banc); Almendares v. State, 916 So.2d 29 (Fla. 4th DCA 2005) ; A......
  • Hoag v. State
    • United States
    • Florida District Court of Appeals
    • May 16, 2012
    ...2d DCA 2009); Bizzell v. State, 912 So.2d 386 (Fla. 2d DCA 2005); Tyson v. State, 852 So.2d 428 (Fla. 2d DCA 2003); Gonsalves v.. State, 830 So.2d 265 (Fla. 2d DCA 2002); Horton v. State, 696 So.2d 460 (Fla. 1st DCA 1997).ALTENBERND, NORTHCUTT, and CASANUEVA, JJ., ...
  • Thornton v. State
    • United States
    • Florida District Court of Appeals
    • November 6, 2013
    ...2d DCA 2004); Boyd v. State, 880 So.2d 726 (Fla. 2d DCA 2004); Burttram v. State, 846 So.2d 1201 (Fla. 2d DCA 2003); Gonsalves v. State, 830 So.2d 265 (Fla. 2d DCA 2002); Brown v. State, 827 So.2d 1054 (Fla. 2d DCA 2002); Wendt v. State, 711 So.2d 1166 (Fla. 2d DCA 1998) (en banc); Williams......
  • Vasquez v. State, 2D12–6259.
    • United States
    • Florida District Court of Appeals
    • August 21, 2013
    ...DCA 2012); Bizzell v.. State, 912 So.2d 386 (Fla. 2d DCA 2005); Carpenter v. State, 884 So.2d 385 (Fla. 2d DCA 2004); Gonsalves v. State, 830 So.2d 265 (Fla. 2d DCA 2002); Wendt v. State, 711 So.2d 1166 (Fla. 2d DCA 1998) (en banc); Allen v. State, 976 So.2d 1189 (Fla. 5th DCA 2008); Willia......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT