Gontz v. Cooper City
Citation | 228 So.2d 913 |
Decision Date | 26 November 1969 |
Docket Number | No. 2264,2264 |
Parties | Paul GONTZ, Appellant, v. COOPER CITY, a municipal corporation, Appellee. |
Court | Court of Appeal of Florida (US) |
Howard M. Duncanson, Hollywood, for appellant.
A. J. Ryan, Jr., Dania, for appellee.
Paul Gontz, a policeman, sued his employer, City of Cooper City, for wages. Judgment was entered for the City. Gontz appeals. We reverse.
The City employed Gontz as a part time policeman for wages of $30.00 per week. On October 8, 1966, the Chief of Police suspended Gontz. It was not until March 6, 1967, that the City Commission of Cooper City officially terminated Gontz's employment. During the interim Gontz presented himself for work but his presentation was refused by the Chief. During the interim the question of Gontz's status was steadily presented to the Commission with no action being taken because of the inability of the Commissioners to make a decision due to an even division of opinion. There is no evidence or suggestion that Gontz was in any way responsible for the delayed decision.
Gontz says he is entitled to wages for the whole period from suspension to termination. The City contends to the contrary. Neither offer any authority or legal support for their respective positions except for a single naked sentence gleaned from 62 C.J.S. Municipal Corporations § 528, p. 977, as follows:
'A municipal officer legally removed from office is not entitled to the compensation attached to the office after such removal.'
Suffice it to say this court cannot quarrel with the pronouncement.
Forging ahead, we know that a municipality derives its power by way of delegation from the state. This delegation is chiefly accomplished by Special Acts of the Legislature whereby charter powers are granted to a city. Thus, the paramount law of a municipal corporation is its charter, which resembles the constitution of a state and gives the municipality all the powers it possesses, unless other statutes are applicabel to it. Clark v. North Bay Village, Fla.1951, 54 So.2d 240. See also 17 F.L.P., Municipal Corporations, §§ 2, 5, 8 and 12.
The relevant parts of the Charter of the City are as follows:
'Section 12--All powers of the City, except as otherwise provided herein, or in the Constitution of the State of Florida, are hereby vested in the Commission.
In sum and application we see that the City Commission had the power...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Bush v. Holmes
...the legislative power of a city in the same manner the state constitution limits the power of the Legislature. See Gontz v. Cooper City, 228 So.2d 913 (Fla. 4th DCA 1970).24 The supreme court, however, held that the City of Boca Raton's expenditure of public funds for a day care center run ......
-
City of Miami Beach v. Fleetwood Hotel, Inc.
...all the powers it possesses, unless other statutes are applicable thereto, has not been altered or changed. Gontz v. Cooper City, (Fla.App., 1970) 228 So.2d 913, Clark v. North Bay Village, et al., (Fla.1951) 54 So.2d 240. The powers of a municipality are to be interpreted and construed in ......
-
Admiral Development Corp. v. City of Maitland
...all the powers it possesses, unless other statutes are applicable thereto, has not been altered or changed. Gontz v. Cooper City (Fla.App., 1970) 228 So.2d 913; Clark v. North Bay Village et al. (Fla.1951) 54 So.2d 240. The powers of a municipality are to be interpreted and construed in ref......
-
Thompson v. Ramsdell, 75--1970
...A fortiori, appellant's discharge thereunder for violations thereof was invalid and of no force and effect. Cf. Gontz v. Cooper City, 228 So.2d 913 (Fla.4th DCA 1970). Accordingly, the final judgment is reversed and the cause remanded to the circuit court for the entry of an order or judgme......