Goodell v. Buck

Decision Date31 October 1877
Citation67 Me. 514
PartiesMARY GOODELL, in equity, v. WILLIAM G. BUCK et al. administrators. R. P. BUCK in equity v. WILLIAM G. BUCK et al. administrators.
CourtMaine Supreme Court

BILL IN EQUITY, submitted upon the following agreed statement of facts:

The complainant, Richard P. Buck, of Brooklyn, New York, is, and has been for some years past, the owner of 3-16 of the ship Mary Goodell. During the five years next prior to March 9 1876, William McGilvery, late of Searsport, deceased, was agent of the ship Mary Goodell, and in that capacity received the earnings for the owners.

McGilvery received March 6, 1876, the sum of $5578.82, as the earnings of the ship, and declared the same a dividend, and there was due the complainant on said March 6, as his share in the dividend, as declared by McGilvery, the sum of $1046.02 which sum McGilvery received and held in his capacity of agent for the ship, and said sum was not in any other manner entrusted to or held by the said McGilvery.

The following in relation to the dividend aforesaid is from the dividend book kept by McGilvery.

March 6, 1876. By balance of ledger account $5578.82

To paid owners, viz:

Wm. McGilvery 1-8 $697 35.
R. P. Buck, 3-16 1046 02.
Mary Goodell, 1-8 697 35.
James McGilvery, 1-8 697 35. Credit in account.
T. H. Buck, 1-8 697 35. Credit in account.
Jere. Sweetzer, 1-8 697 35. Credit in account.
Bridge, Lord & Co. 1-16 348 67. Credit in account.
Simon Ross, 1-16 348 67. Credit in account.
T. M. Hichborn, 1-16 348 67. Credit in account.
$5578 82.

The sum of $5578.82, the dividend received and declared, March 6, 1876, for the ship Mary Goodell, was deposited in the Searsport bank, in Searsport, by McGilvery as other money was deposited, as he kept an open account with the bank.

McGilvery at the time of his death had the following sums on deposit: $4528.90 at the Searsport bank in Searsport; $1375 at the 1st National bank in Bangor; $2400 at the Maverick bank in Boston, all of which said several sums from said banks came into the hands of said administrators.

McGilvery died March 9, 1876. His estate was duly rendered insolvent, and commissioners of insolvency were appointed.

The defendants are his legal administrators, and since their appointment as such, the complainant before filing this bill, demanded of the administrators the sum of $1046.02, the amount due him from the dividend received from the said ship Mary Goodell, by said McGilvery, on March 6, A. D. 1876, and the defendants have refused and do refuse to deliver said sum of money to him, unless so ordered to do by this court. The prayer of the bill is, that the defendants in their capacity as administrators may be decreed to deliver to him said sum of $1046.02, held by McGilvery, in his capacity as agent for the ship Mary Goodell, at the time of his death. There is also a prayer for general relief. The answers of the defendants maintain that there is an adequate remedy at law.

H. D. Hadlock, for the plaintiffs.

J. Williamson, for the defendants.

LIBBEY J.

Undoubtedly a bill in equity may be maintained against an administrator...

To continue reading

Request your trial
17 cases
  • Bank Com'rs v. Sec. Trust Co.
    • United States
    • New Hampshire Supreme Court
    • 15. März 1901
    ...E. 1005, 7 L. R. A. 570, 571. The following, being some of the more recent authorities on the subject, support these propositions: Goodall v. Buck, 67 Me. 514; Houghton v. Davenport, 74 Me. 590; Slater v. Oriental Mills, 18 R. I. 352, 27 Atl. 443; Cavin v. Gleason, 105 N. Y. 256, 11 N. E. 5......
  • City of St. Paul v. Seymour
    • United States
    • Minnesota Supreme Court
    • 24. Januar 1898
    ... ... Flanders, 87 Wis. 237; In re ... Plankington, 87 Wis. 378; Henika v. Heinemann, ... 90 Wis. 478; Portland v. Locke, 73 Me. 370; Goodell ... v. Buck, 67 Me. 514 ...           ...           [71 ... Minn. 305] CANTY, J ...          [2] ... ...
  • State v. Foster
    • United States
    • Wyoming Supreme Court
    • 5. Januar 1895
    ... ... Bank, 58 id., 5; Ferchen v. Arndt (Or.), 37 P ... 161; Englar v. Offutt, 70 Md. 78; Lathrop v ... Bampton, 31 Cal. 17; Goodell v. Buck, 67 Me ... 514; Steamboat Co. v. Locke, 73 id., 370; Dyer ... v. Jacoway, 42 Ark. 186; Bank v. Davis, 114 ... N.C. 343.) State not ... ...
  • Cherry v. Territory
    • United States
    • Oklahoma Supreme Court
    • 5. September 1906
    ... ... heirs or the product of it. The decree was therefore ... erroneous. To the same effect is Goodell v. Buck, 67 ... Me. 514; Steamboat Company v. Locke, 73 Me. 370; ... U.S. v. Inhabitants of Waterborough, 2 Ware, 158, F ... Cas. No. 16,648; ... ...
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT