Goodwill Advertising Co. v. State Liquor Authority

Decision Date08 November 1963
Citation19 A.D.2d 928,244 N.Y.S.2d 640
PartiesCOODWILL ADVERTISING COMPANY, Respondent, v. STATE LIQUOR AUTHORITY of the State of New York, Appellant.
CourtNew York Supreme Court — Appellate Division

Hyman Amsel, New York City, for appellant.

Keating & Brodkin, New York City, for respondent (Albert H. Brodkin, New York City).

Judgment and order affirmed, with costs, on the opinion of Cooke, J., at Special Term. Sup., 244 N.Y.S.2d 322.

BERGAN, P. J., and GIBSON, REYNOLDS and TAYLOR, JJ., concur.

To continue reading

Request your trial
9 cases
  • Fadden v. Cambridge Mut. Fire Ins. Co.
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court
    • 5 Septiembre 1966
    ...279 App.Div. 689, 107 N.Y.S.2d 925; Goodwill Adv. Co. v. State Liquor Auth., 40 Misc.2d 886, 888, 244 N.Y.S.2d 322, 324, affd. 19 A.D.2d 928, 244 N.Y.S.2d 640; Oneida Nat. Bank & Trust Co. of Central New York v. Conte, 32 Misc.2d 368, 372, 224 N.Y.S.2d 738, 742; Coutts v. J. L. Kraft & Bros......
  • Russell v. Town of Pittsford
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division
    • 11 Julio 1983
    ...New York, 87 A.D.2d 270, 450 N.Y.S.2d 839; Goodwill Adv. Co. v. State Liq. Auth., 40 Misc.2d 886, 888, 244 N.Y.S.2d 322, affd. 19 A.D.2d 928, 244 N.Y.S.2d 640; cf. Town of Harrison v. County of Westchester, 13 A.D.2d 708, 214 N.Y.S.2d 229). As a result of defendant's failure to present any ......
  • Schwartz v. Marien
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division
    • 17 Enero 1974
    ...judgment should be granted (Goodwill Advertising Company v. State Liquor Authority, 40 Misc.2d 886, 244 N.Y.S.2d 322, affd. 19 A.D.2d 928, 244 N.Y.S.2d 640). In the instant case both parties moved for summary judgment and both assert that there are no factual issues a dispute between them. ......
  • Shubitz v. Consolidated Edison Co. of New York
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court
    • 12 Mayo 1969
    ...v. Feldshuh, Sup., 200 N.Y.S.2d 480; Goodwill Advertising Co. v. State Liquor Authority, 40 Misc.2d 886, 244 N.Y.S.2d 322, affd. 19 A.D.2d 928, 244 N.Y.S.2d 640.) Judge Cardozo succinctly stated the principle of law here involved: "In every instance, before negligence can be predicated of a......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT