Goodwin v. State, 372A157
Decision Date | 01 September 1972 |
Docket Number | No. 372A157,372A157 |
Citation | 153 Ind.App. 203,286 N.E.2d 703 |
Parties | Burdell GOODWIN, Appellant (Defendant Below), v. STATE of Indiana, Appellee (Plaintiff Below). |
Court | Indiana Appellate Court |
Harriette Bailey Conn, Public Defender, Paul J. Baldoni, Deputy Public Defender, for appellant.
Theodore L. Sendak, Atty. Gen., Stephen J. Cuthbert, Deputy Atty. Gen., for appellee.
Burdell Goodwin, age twenty years, waived arraignment on February 11, 1963 and entered his plea of guilty to entering to commit a felony. The affidavit charged him with first degree burglary. He was placed on probation. Several months later, he violated his probation and was sentenced to the Indiana State Reformatory for a term of not less than one nor more than ten years. He filed a petition for post conviction relief on May 5, 1971 which was denied. Only one question of error is presented by this appeal: Should Burdell Goodwin's sentence be corrected to a term of not less than one nor more than five years?
In our opinion which follows, we reverse the trial court's judgment with instructions to enter a corrected judgment for not less than one nor more than five years. There is only one indeterminate sentence for entering to commit a felony. This sentence is a term of not less than one year nor more than five years. Entering to commit a felony is a lesser includable offense of second degree burglary, which provides for a sentence of not less than two nor more than five years.
An indeterminate sentence is for the Maximum time prescribed by statute. Hobbs v. State (1969), 253 Ind. 195, 252 N.E.2d 498; Heathe v. State (1971), Ind., 274 N.E.2d 697. Burdell Goodwin pleaded guilty to entering to commit a felony. The penalty for entering to commit a felony is one to five years since it is a lesser includable offense of second degree burglary. Assessing a penalty of not less than one nor more than ten years for the offense of entering to commit a felony is error. The ten year maximum is greater than the maximum of five years for second degree burglary. Assessing such a penalty violates the Eighth Amendment to the United States Constitution and Art. 1, § 16 of the Indiana Constitution. Dembowski v. State (1968), 251 Ind. 250, 240 N.E.2d 815.
In Heathe v. State, supra, our Supreme Court stated:
In Easton v. State (1972), Ind., 280 N.E.2d 307, 311, our Supreme Court stated in an opinion written by Justice Prentice in which the entire court concurred:
...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Thompson v. State
...the conviction for the lesser is the product of a plea bargain. In 1972, the First District Court of Appeals in Goodwin v. State, (1972) 153 Ind.App. 203, 286 N.E.2d 703, considered our holding in Heathe and applied it to a situation like the one before us, and correctly concluded that the ......
-
Harrison v. State
...burglary. Somewhat belatedly appellant has focused our attention upon Lee v. State (1972 Ind.) 286 N.E.2d 840; Goodwin v. State (1972 Ind.App.3rd District) 286 N.E.2d 703; and Paschall v. State (1972 Ind.App.1st District) 283 N.E.2d 801, which on their face hold that the maximum sentence fo......
- Dlz Indiana, LLC v. Greene County