Gorby, Matter of

Decision Date11 December 1985
Docket NumberNo. 10-84,10-84
CourtWest Virginia Supreme Court
PartiesIn the Matter of Magistrate Kenneth L. GORBY.

Syllabus by the Court

The purpose of judicial disciplinary proceedings is the preservation and enhancement of public confidence in the honor, integrity, dignity, and efficiency of the members of the judiciary and the system of justice.

Charles R. Garten, Charleston, for Jud. Inv. Comm.

David J. Romano, Young, Morgan, Cann & Romano, Clarksburg, for Gorby.

McGRAW, Justice.

The petitioner, Magistrate Kenneth L. Gorby, requests a reduction of his six month suspension without pay imposed by this Court on July 9, 1985, pursuant to our determination of his violation of Canon 2 A of the Judicial Code of Ethics with respect to a series of altercations initiated at a high school football game. He asserts that since July 11, 1985, the effective date of the order, he has conducted himself in a respectable manner and in conformance with the mandates of the Judicial Code of Ethics. He further states in his petition that:

This is the first occasion in which the Petitioner has been the subject of a complaint filed with the Judicial Investigation Commission. Even though the experience was not a pleasant one, it has increased the Petitioner's awareness of the high standard of conduct required of him by the Judicial Code of Ethics. Petitioner realizes that as a result of holding a judicial office, his conduct must be such as will bestow the utmost respect for the office he holds as well as instill confidence in the public that he will exercise the highest degree of respect for the law. He is also aware that his reaction to any situation must be made in light of the office which he holds; and while a certain reaction may not be inappropriate for others, the same reaction may be inappropriate for him due to the position he holds.

It is well established that the purpose of judicial disciplinary proceedings is the preservation and enhancement of public confidence in the honor, dignity, integrity, and efficiency of the members of the judiciary and the system of justice. See Matter of Riley, 142 Ariz. 604, 615, 691 P.2d 695, 706 (1984); Wenger v. Commission on Judicial Performance, 29 Cal.3d 615, 654, 175 Cal.Rptr. 420, 442, 630 P.2d 954, 976 (1981); In re Kelly, 238 So.2d 565, 569 (Fla.1970); State ex rel. Commission on Judicial Qualifications v. Rome, 229 Kan. 195, 205-06, 623 P.2d 1307, 1317 (1981); Nicholson v. Judicial Retirement and Removal Commission, 562 S.W.2d 306, 308 (Ky.1978); In re Diener, 268 Md. 659, 670,...

To continue reading

Request your trial
23 cases
  • In re Callaghan
    • United States
    • Supreme Court of West Virginia
    • February 9, 2017
    ...the honor, integrity, dignity, and efficiency of the members of the judiciary and the system of justice." Syl., In the Matter of Gorby , 176 W.Va. 16, 339 S.E.2d 702 (1985). That such a goal must, at a minimum, begin by regulating the conduct of those who seek to become members of the judic......
  • State ex rel. Judicial Investigation Comm'n v. Putnam Cnty. Bd. of Ballot Comm'rs
    • United States
    • Supreme Court of West Virginia
    • April 7, 2016
    ...the honor, integrity, dignity, and efficiency of the members of the judiciary and the system of justice.” Syl., in part, Matter of Gorby, 176 W.Va. 16, 339 S.E.2d 702 (1985).Although the Code of Judicial Conduct (“the Code”) is intended to ensure “an independent, fair, and competent judicia......
  • In re Wilfong
    • United States
    • Supreme Court of West Virginia
    • October 30, 2014
    ... 234 W.Va. 394 765 S.E.2d 283 In the Matter of Jaymie Godwin WILFONG, Judge, 20th Judicial Circuit. No. 14–0379. Supreme Court of Appeals of West Virginia. Submitted Oct. 21, 2014. Decided ... in the honor, integrity, dignity, and efficiency of the members of the judiciary and the system of justice.” Syllabus, In the Matter of Gorby, 176 W.Va. 16, 339 S.E.2d 702 (1985). “Under Rule 4.12 of the Rules of Judicial Disciplinary Procedure [1998] the Judicial Hearing Board may ......
  • In re Judge William M. Watkins
    • United States
    • Supreme Court of West Virginia
    • March 26, 2013
    ...honor, integrity, dignity, and efficiency of the members of the judiciary and the system of justice.” Syllabus, In the Matter of Gorby, 176 W.Va. 16, 339 S.E.2d 702 (1985). 5. “Pursuant to article VIII, section 8 of the West Virginia Constitution, this Court has the inherent and express aut......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT