Gordon-Jones Const. Co. v. Welder
Decision Date | 20 February 1918 |
Docket Number | (No. 5910.) |
Citation | 201 S.W. 681 |
Parties | GORDON-JONES CONST. CO. et al. v. WELDER et al. |
Court | Texas Court of Appeals |
Appeal from District Court, Victoria County; Jno. M. Green, Judge.
Suit in nature of an interpleader by John J. Welder against the Gordon-Jones Construction Company and others. From a judgment, certain defendants appeal. Judgment reformed and affirmed.
C. A. Keller, of San Antonio, and R. L. Daniel and C. F. & C. C. Carsner, all of Victoria, for appellants. H. M. Aubrey, of San Antonio, and Proctor, Vandenberge, Crain & Mitchell, of Victoria, for appellees.
John J. Welder, the appellee, filed this suit in the nature of an interpleader against the appellants, Gordon-Jones Construction Company, the Alamo Iron Works, Peden Roofing Company, Monarch Metal Manufacturing Company, G. D. Robbins, Texas Glass & Paint Company, Chas. Lucas Company, Elgin-Butler Brick & Tile Company, New Jersey Terra Cotta Company, J. Desco & Son, Uhrich Planing Mills Company, R. P. Field, and the Collinsville Manufacturing Company, and against a number of other parties who did not appeal from the judgment of the trial court. The defendants were materialmen, subcontractors, laborers, the original contractor and its bondsmen, and the Victoria National Bank, an assignee of the contractor. The purpose of the suit was to secure a legal adjustment of the respective rights of all parties in and to the contract price promised by the owner, Mr. Welder, to the contractor, the Gordon-Jones Construction Company, and also to determine the liabilities of the contractor and its bondsmen to Mr. Welder.
Without the intervention of a jury, the court rendered judgment dismissing many of the defendants, none of whom appealed. The judgment decreed:
The original petition alleged a contract whereby the Gordon-Jones Construction Company bound itself to construct a building for the appellee Welder for a stipulated price; that in accordance with the contract the contractors partially erected the building, when it abandoned the contract, after which the owner, Mr. Welder, as stipulated in the contract, completed the building according to the contract specifications; before the abandonment of the contract the contractor was paid by the owner 80 per cent. of the architect's estimates; to complete the building after the abandonment by the contractor, the owner spent a large sum of money; that by reason of delay in completion of the building the owner suffered damages liquidated by the terms of the contract. It was alleged that a large amount of the contract price remained in the owner's hands which he desired to pay to those entitled to it.
The appellees herein severally answered, setting out their accounts for material or labor or their subcontracts, stating the amount claimed by each, and each claimed a mechanic's or materialman's lien on the building. Each claimed a personal judgment against the owner as well as against the contractor.
No objection being raised in appellants' briefs to the trial court's findings of fact, except the twentieth, which we find to be supported by the evidence, we adopt them as our findings of fact:
To continue reading
Request your trial-
E. Nelson Mfg. & Lumber Co. v. Roddy
...of all claims of laborers and materialmen who subsequently give notice of their claims to the owners. Gordon-Jones Const. Co. v. Welder (Tex. Civ. App.) 201 S. W. 681, 685; articles 5463 and 5469, R. S. 1925; Beilharz v. Illingsworth, 62 Tex. Civ. App. 647, 132 S. W. 106; Campbell v. Teeple......
-
Patten v. Hill County
...Bank of Paducah, Ky. (C. C. A.) 206 F. 250, 252; Wilson v. Citizens' Trust Co. (D. C.) 233 F. 697. See, also, Gordon-Jones Const. Co. v. Welder (Tex. Civ. App.) 201 S. W. 681, 684 (writ Appellant contends that said judgment in favor of Hill county was a partnership debt; that the balance du......
-
Henderson v. Couch
...the trustees had the right to make payment on the contract price without regard to the claims of appellants. Gordon Jones Const Co. v. Welder, Tex.Civ.App., 201 S.W. 681, 685, Writ Ref.; Scarborough v. Victoria Bank & Trust Co., Tex.Civ.App., 250 S.W.2d 918, Writ Ref.; 29 Tex.Jur. 596; Nich......
-
In re Waterpoint Intern. LLC
...funds for the benefit of derivative claimants primarily. See First Nat'l Bank, 217 S.W. at 134; Gordon-Jones Const. Co. v. Welder, 201 S.W. 681, 684 (Tex.App. — San Antonio 1918, writ ref'd) (stating that, while subcontractors "have no privity with the owner, whose obligation is solely to t......