Gordon v. State
Decision Date | 22 March 2018 |
Docket Number | S-17-0173 |
Citation | 413 P.3d 1093 |
Parties | Mark GORDON, in his duly elected and official capacity as the Treasurer of the State of Wyoming and in his individual capacity as a resident and qualified elector of the State of Wyoming, Appellant (Plaintiff), v. The STATE of Wyoming, acting BY AND THROUGH the CAPITOL BUILDING REHABILITATION and Restoration Oversight Group, a statutory committee operating under the auspices of Wyoming Senate File 103 (2014), codified at W.S. 9-5-111 (LexisNexis 2016) and Wyoming Senate File 0041 (2016), Appellee (Defendant). |
Court | Wyoming Supreme Court |
Representing Appellant: Anthony T. Wendtland of Wendtland & Wendtland, LLP, Sheridan, Wyoming
Representing Appellee: Peter K. Michael, Wyoming Attorney General; Jay A. Jerde, Special Assistant Attorney General. Argument by Mr. Jerde.
Before BURKE, C.J., and HILL* , DAVIS, FOX, and KAUTZ, JJ.
[¶1] Mark Gordon, in his capacity as Treasurer of the State of Wyoming,1 filed a complaint for declaratory judgment and permanent injunctive relief challenging on its face the constitutionality of legislation that created the State Capitol Building Rehabilitation and Restoration Oversight Group (oversight group). The district court granted the State's motion for summary judgment, holding that Gordon had failed to establish that the legislation facially violated the Wyoming Constitution. Gordon appeals from the district court's order. We reverse and remand.
[¶2] Gordon states the issues for this Court's consideration as follows:
[¶3] In 2014, the Wyoming Legislature enacted legislation to effectuate restoration of the state capitol and Herschler state office buildings.2 The statutes provided in pertinent part:
2014 Wyo. Sess. Laws ch. 40, § 1.
[¶4] As the above provisions reflect, the 2014 legislation did not designate the state treasurer as a member of the oversight group, nor did it provide that the state treasurer's approval was required for contracts related to the capitol restoration project.
[¶5] In February 2016, the Office of the Attorney General for the State of Wyoming issued a formal opinion addressing the question of the treasurer's role under Article 3, § 31 in the capitol restoration project. Wyo. Atty. Gen. Op. 2016-001, 2016 WL 870371 (Feb. 2, 2016). In the opinion, the attorney general's office concluded that Article 3, § 31 did not require the treasurer's approval of capitol restoration project contracts. Id. at 1. The opinion stated, however, that Article 3, § 31 did not bar the legislature from passing statutes providing for treasurer participation in the process.
[¶6] In May of 2016, Gordon filed a complaint asserting that the legislation was illegal on its face because it violated Article 3, § 31 of the Wyoming Constitution, which provides:
All stationary, printing, paper, fuel and lights used in the legislature and other departments of government shall be furnished, and the printing and binding of the laws, journals and department reports and other printing and binding, and the repairing and furnishing the halls and rooms used for the meeting of the legislature and its committees shall be performed under contract, to be given to the lowest responsible bidder, below such maximum price and under such regulations as may be prescribed by law. No member or officer of any department of the government shall be in any way interested in any such contract; and all such contracts shall be subject to the approval of the governor and state treasurer.
Wyo. Const. Art. 3, § 31 (emphasis added). Gordon argued that the legislation violated this provision because it did not provide for the state treasurer's approval of contracts for the capitol restoration project, which involved "repairing and furnishing the halls and rooms used for the meeting of the legislature and its committees."7
[¶7] Gordon further asserted that the legislation violated Article 2, § 1 of the Wyoming Constitution, which states:
The powers of the government of this state are divided into three distinct departments: The legislative, executive and judicial,...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Sheesley v. State
...its unconstitutionality beyond any reasonable doubt. Gordon v. State by and through Capitol Bldg. Rehab. , 2018 WY 32, ¶ 12, 413 P.3d 1093, 1099 (Wyo. 2018) (citing Krenning v. Heart Mt. Irrigation Dist. , 2009 WY 11, ¶ 33, 200 P.3d 774, 784 (Wyo. 2009) ).DISCUSSIONI. Was Ms. Sheesley denie......
-
Herrick v. Jackson Hole Airport Bd.
...general words to a sense analogous to the less general." Gordon v. State by & through Capitol Bldg. Rehab. , 2018 WY 32, ¶ 48, 413 P.3d 1093, 1107 (Wyo. 2018) (citations and quotation marks omitted). "The doctrine is applied only to discover the meaning of ambiguous terms." Id. We have conc......
-
Air Methods/Rocky Mountain Holdings, LLC v. State
...but this Court has nonetheless treated the rule as a binding directive from the legislature. Gordon v. State, 2018 WY 32, ¶ 59, 413 P.3d 1093, 1110 (Wyo. 2018) ("The Wyoming legislature has directed us to attempt to salvage such portions of otherwise unconstitutional legislation it enacts a......
-
Mantle v. N. Star Energy & Constr. LLC
...otherwise silent. See Wyo. Const., art. V, § 10 ; see also Gordon v. State by & through Capitol Bldg. Rehab. , 2018 WY 32, ¶ 40, 413 P.3d 1093, 1105 (Wyo. 2018) (" Article 5, § 10, [ ] grants the district courts plenary power in all cases of law and equity[.]"); Midwest Ref. Co. v. George ,......
-
Revisiting the Wyo. State Constitution
...Council of the Wyoming Legislature v. Geringer, 953 P.3d 839 (Wyo. 1998); Powers v. State, 318 P.3d 300 (Wyo. 2014); Gordon v. State, 413 P.3d 1093 (Wyo. 2018). [7] White v. Fisher, 689 P.2d 102 (Wyo. 1984); Allred v. Bebout, 409 P.3d 260, 269 (Wyo. 2018); In re Adoption of L-MHB, 431 P.3d ......