Gorelick v. Harrison County

Decision Date21 October 1986
Docket NumberNo. 9492,9492
Citation720 S.W.2d 835
PartiesAlbert P. GORELICK, et ux., Appellants, v. HARRISON COUNTY, Texas, et al., Appellees.
CourtTexas Court of Appeals

Albert P. Gorelick, pro se.

Bonnie Leggat, Dist. Atty., Harrison County Courthouse, Marshall, for appellees.

BLEIL, Justice.

Albert Gorelick and his wife appeal a summary judgment barring his suit on the basis of res judicata. We affirm.

The Texas Highway Department widened U.S. Highway 59 in 1972, purchasing a channel easement across what would later be Gorelick's property from Gorelick's predecessors in title. Gorelick bought the land in 1973, and discovered that the property floods following heavy rains.

In 1980, Gorelick brought suit in federal district court, alleging an unconstitutional taking of his property resulting in an inverse condemnation, and also that his civil rights were violated. The named defendants in this suit were the State of Texas; L.L. Jester, district engineer of the State Highway Department; Raymond Hudson, maintenance engineer for the State Highway Department; L.S. Guest, legal officer of the State Highway Department; J.C. Norman, former chief deputy sheriff of Harrison County; N.F. Shivers, former sheriff of Harrison County; and Sam Baxter, district attorney of Harrison County. The court dismissed Gorelick's civil rights claim and adjudicated the property claim, entering judgment against the Gorelicks on February 13, 1983. Gorelick v. State of Texas, 572 F.Supp. 301 (E.D.Texas 1983).

In April of 1984, the Gorelicks filed suit in Harrison County, alleging a wrongful taking and damaging of their property. On April 22, 1985, a summary judgment was granted on the ground of res judicata in favor of defendants Texas State Highway and Public Transportation Department; Mark Goode, engineering director for the Highway Department; L.L. Jester; and Tom Rideout of Marshall. Gorelick appealed this judgment to the Texarkana Court of Appeals, which affirmed the trial court in an unpublished opinion dated November 13, 1985. Gorelick petitioned for writ of error to the Texas Supreme Court, which refused to grant the writ for want of jurisdiction on July 16, 1986.

On December 20, 1985, the trial court entered a summary judgment on behalf of Harrison County, who was a defendant in the state court suit. The present appeal is from this order.

We conclude that the appeal before us, like the previous one, is barred by res judicata as the state trial court held. The prerequisites for the application of the doctrine of res judicata are: (1) that the prior judgment was rendered by a court of competent jurisdiction; (2) that there was a final judgment on the merits; (3) that the parties, or those in privity with them, are identical in both suits; and (4) that the same cause of action is involved in both suits. Brown v. Prairie View A & M University, ...

To continue reading

Request your trial
5 cases
  • U.S. Fire Ins. Co. v. Deering Management Group, Inc.
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — Northern District of Texas
    • 13 Agosto 1996
    ...v. Harrison County was not an insurance case, but rather involved a suit for wrongful taking and damaging of property. 720 S.W.2d 835, 836 (Tex.App. — Texarkana 1986). Furthermore, the Gorelick court's finding of privity was predicated upon derivative liability, not open and active particip......
  • Kale v. Palmer
    • United States
    • Texas Court of Appeals
    • 14 Junio 1990
    ...writ ref'd n.r.e.). See also, Siratt v. City of River Oaks, 305 S.W.2d 207 (Tex.Civ.App.--Fort Worth 1957, writ ref'd); Gorelick v. Harrision County, 720 S.W.2d 835 (Tex.App.--Texarkana 1986, no Dr. B. Kale's rights and interest, if any, are identical to Dr. A. Kale's. Both seek damages for......
  • Sutherland v. Cobern, 6-91-122-CV
    • United States
    • Texas Court of Appeals
    • 27 Octubre 1992
    ...in privity with them, are identical in both suits; and (4) that the same cause of action is involved in both suits. Gorelick v. Harrison County, 720 S.W.2d 835, 836 (Tex.App.-Texarkana 1986, no writ). Sutherland's attorney maintains that res judicata bars this suit based on the original div......
  • Scott v. Fort Bend County, 88-2732
    • United States
    • U.S. Court of Appeals — Fifth Circuit
    • 7 Marzo 1989
    ...(citing Abbott Laboratories v. Gravis, 470 S.W.2d 639, 642 (Tex.1971)); Bonniwell, 663 S.W.2d at 818.6 Gorelick v. Harrison County, 720 S.W.2d 835, 836 (Tex.Ct.App.1986).7 McWilliams, 804 F.2d at 1402-03.8 Id. at ...
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT