Gorham v. Gross
Decision Date | 12 April 1875 |
Citation | 117 Mass. 442 |
Court | United States State Supreme Judicial Court of Massachusetts Supreme Court |
Parties | Charles L. Gorham & another v. Raphael Gross & another |
Argued October 2, 1874
Worcester. Contract, with counts in tort. The count in contract was as follows: "And the plaintiffs say that the plaintiffs and the defendants mutually executed and entered into an indenture, a copy of which is hereto annexed and were the respective owners of two adjoining parcels of land on the west side of Main Street, Worcester, as in said indenture set forth; that the defendants erected the party wall therein mentioned, but erected the same negligently, improperly and without due care, and by means thereof said wall fell upon the plaintiff's said close, and injured and destroyed a building thereon standing, and injured and destroyed a stock of goods, merchandise and other personal property in said building, the same being the property of the plaintiffs, and otherwise injured the plaintiffs."
The indenture was dated July 9, 1873, and the material parts thereof were as follows: "Whereas the said Charles L. and Chester Gorham, and the said Gross and Strauss, are owners of certain adjoining parcels of land situated on the westerly side of Main Street in the said Worcester between land of the People's Savings Bank on the north and land of Mrs. Mary H. E. Davis on the south, and whereas the said parties to these presents propose to erect buildings upon their respective premises, they do hereby covenant and agree, each with the other, for themselves, their heirs or assigns, that the wall between their said premises shall be what is known as a party wall, to wit: One half of the thickness of the wall shall be built upon land owned by each of the said parties to these presents, and for the proper erection and maintenance of such party wall, the said parties do hereby give and grant each to the other, and to their heirs or assigns, all such rights and privileges in the premises and estates of each other as may be necessary for the fulfilment of this agreement in each and every particular thereof, subject to the restrictions and provisions hereinafter specified.
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Gorham v. Gross
...[Syllabus Material] [Syllabus Material] Worcester. Tort for injuries by the falling of a party wall. After the decision reported 117 Mass. 442, the case was in this court, before Morton, J., who allowed a bill of exceptions in substance as follows: On July 9, 1873, the plaintiffs and the de......