O'Gorman v. O'Gorman, 26389
| Decision Date | 08 April 1971 |
| Docket Number | No. 26389,26389 |
| Citation | 227 Ga. 468,181 S.E.2d 490 |
| Parties | James J. O'GORMAN v. Catherine A. O'GORMAN. |
| Court | Georgia Supreme Court |
Robert P. Mallis, Richardson, Chenggis & Constantinides, Chamblee, for appellant.
Houston White, Sr., Red Oak, for appellee.
Syllabus Opinion by the Court
This appeal involves rulings made in a divorce and alimony case. All the enumerations of error require consideration of the evidence. However, appellant specified in his notice of appeal that no transcript be filed in the record of appeal, and none has been sent to this court. Furthermore, no stipulation showing the facts necessary for rulings by this court has been entered into and filed. The duty rests upon the appellant to have the transcript prepared if needed for decision here. Code Ann. § 6-805 (Ga.L.1965, pp. 18, 24). Without the transcript we must assume that the evidence authorized the judgments. Under these circumstances the judgments complained of must be affirmed. See Graham v. Haley, 224 Ga. 498, 162 S.E.2d 346.
Judgments affirmed.
All the Justices concur.
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
Tolbert v. Tolbert
...is sent up and 'no stipulation showing the facts necessary for rulings by this court has been entered into and filed.' O'Gorman v. O'Gorman, 227 Ga. 468, 181 S.E.2d 490. While there is a stipulation here, it does not include the facts necessary for a ruling on the issue of whether the chang......
-
Griggs v. Griggs
...of evidence we are unable to consider these enumerations of error and we will not presume that error was committed. O'Gorman v. O'Gorman, 227 Ga. 468, 181 S.E.2d 490; Taylor v. Taylor, 228 Ga. 173(1), 184 S.E.2d 3. Another enumeration recites that the trial court erred in refusing to certif......
- Ham v. Watkins
- Lane v. Morrison