Gorman v. State, 92-2700
| Decision Date | 13 May 1994 |
| Docket Number | No. 92-2700,92-2700 |
| Citation | 636 So.2d 203 |
| Parties | 19 Fla. L. Weekly D1126 Joseph GORMAN, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee. |
| Court | Florida District Court of Appeals |
Appeal from the Circuit Court for Bay County; N. Russell Bower, Judge.
Nancy A. Daniels, Public Defender, Abel Gomez, Asst. Public Defender, Tallahassee, for appellant.
Robert A. Butterworth, Atty. Gen., Gypsy Bailey, Asst. Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, for appellee.
Appellant raises two points on appeal: 1) Whether the trial court erred in allowing three state witnesses to testify to hearsay statements made by the child victim, and 2) whether the trial court had jurisdiction to resentence the appellant and enter an amended sentencing order after appellant had filed an appeal. We find no merit as to issue I, and affirm without further discussion.
As to issue II, while it appears that the original sentence was illegal, the trial court lacked jurisdiction to amend the sentence after the notice of appeal was filed in this court. Kelly v. State, 359 So.2d 493 (Fla. 1st DCA 1978). In the interest of judicial economy, we affirm the judgment, but remand for imposition of the sentence in accordance with the penalty for violation of section 775.082(1), Florida Statutes (1991).
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
State v. Morales
...until after the notice of appeal had already been filed. See Loeb v. State, 387 So.2d 433, 435 (Fla. 3d DCA 1980); Gorman v. State, 636 So.2d 203 (Fla. 1st DCA 1994); see also Jordon v. State, 631 So.2d 362 (Fla. 1st DCA 1994); Bauman v. State, 600 So.2d 551 (Fla. 2d DCA 1992); Key v. State......
- Carter v. Brickell Associates, Inc., 93-1570