O'Gorman v. Vill. of Morris

Decision Date25 November 1879
Citation26 Minn. 267,3 N.W. 349
PartiesMICHAEL O'GORMAN, RESPONDENT, v THE VILLAGE OF MORRIS, APPELLANT.
CourtMinnesota Supreme Court

OPINION TEXT STARTS HERE

Appeal from order of district court, counties of Stevens, Big Stone and Traverse, denying defendant's motion for a new trial.

W. H. Harris, for respondent.

C. L. Brown, for appellant.

GILFILLAN, C. J.

The common council of the village corporation has by the charter, authority to raise money for opening, building, grading, paving or repairing streets and cross-walks. Chapter 5, § 16, subd. 25, Sp. Laws 1878.

It appears that the injury to the plaintiff occurred in consequence, not of the omission of the corporation to assume control of a street, but of its failure to properly cover a culvert laid across a street by authority of the corporation. If there was negligence in this, and the jury has found there was, of course the corporation is liable unless there was contributory negligence on the part of plaintiff. The verdict negatives the proposition that there was negligence on the part of plaintiff, and the evidence justifies the finding. There is nothing in the proposition that the damages are excessive. The plaintiff being entitled to recover they are very moderate.

Order affirmed.

To continue reading

Request your trial
4 cases

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT