Goss v. Thornton, 62045

Decision Date06 July 1981
Docket NumberNo. 62045,62045
Citation283 S.E.2d 63,159 Ga.App. 166
PartiesGOSS et al. v. THORNTON et al.
CourtGeorgia Court of Appeals

Audrey P. Biloon, Macon, for appellants.

John Edwards, Macon, for appellees.

BANKE, Judge.

This is an appeal from a summary judgment for the landlord in a dispossessory proceeding. The landlord alleged that the tenants were in default of a lease provision requiring them to make certain repairs. This allegation was supported by an affidavit attached to the motion for summary judgment. The tenants filed an answer asserting that the landlord had agreed orally to make the repairs, but submitted no affidavit or other evidence to support this contention prior to issuance of the summary judgment. They did, however, file such affidavits with their notice of appeal. Held :

1. Code Ann. § 81A-156(e) provides, in pertinent part: "When a motion for summary judgment is made and supported as provided in this section, an adverse party may not rest upon the mere allegation or denials of his pleading, but his response, by affidavits or as otherwise provided in this section, must set forth specific facts showing that there is a genuine issue for trial. If he does not so respond, summary judgment, if appropriate, shall be entered against him." See Walsey v. American Fletcher Nat. Bk., etc., Co., 151 Ga.App. 104, 258 S.E.2d 760 (1979). The affidavits submitted by the appellants were not filed prior to the hearing on the summary judgment motion as required by Code Ann. § 81A-156(c). Indeed, they were until the motion had already been granted. Accordingly, they do not render the court's ruling erroneous. Accord, Sacks v. Bell Tel. Laboratories, 149 Ga.App. 799(1), 256 S.E.2d 87 (1979); Johnson v. Lastinger, 152 Ga.App. 328(2), 262 S.E.2d 601 (1979). Although it is alleged that oral testimony creating a fact issue was offered at the hearing, we are unable to consider this alleged testimony since no transcript of the hearing has been included in the record on appeal.

2. The trial court is not required to submit findings of fact and conclusions of law in deciding a motion for summary judgment. Code Ann. § 81A-152(a).

3. In view of the above, the appellants' remaining enumerations of error are moot.

Judgment affirmed.

DEEN, P. J., and CARLEY, J., concur.

To continue reading

Request your trial
3 cases
  • Knight v. Bryant-Durham Elec. Co., Inc.
    • United States
    • Georgia Court of Appeals
    • January 12, 1984
    ...Plan, 141 Ga.App. 148(2), 232 S.E.2d 641; Wall v. C. & S. Bank of Houston County, 145 Ga.App. 76, 243 S.E.2d 271; Goss v. Thornton, 159 Ga.App. 166(1), 283 S.E.2d 63; Porter Coatings v. Stein Steel &c. Co., 247 Ga. 631, 278 S.E.2d 377, s.c. 157 Ga.App. 260, 277 S.E.2d 272; Gross v. Pyrofax ......
  • Brown v. Reeves, 63943
    • United States
    • Georgia Court of Appeals
    • October 22, 1982
    ...submit findings of fact and conclusions of law in deciding a motion for summary judgment. Code Ann. § 81A-152(a)." Goss v. Thornton, 159 Ga.App. 166, 167, 283 S.E.2d 63 (1981). 4. In his affidavit Leon Reeves avers that he and Evelyn Reeves have signed and deposited the subject stock certif......
  • Roth v. Carey, 61945
    • United States
    • Georgia Court of Appeals
    • July 6, 1981

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT