Gossett v. State
| Decision Date | 05 February 1947 |
| Docket Number | 15705. |
| Citation | 41 S.E.2d 308,201 Ga. 809 |
| Parties | GOSSETT v. STATE. |
| Court | Georgia Supreme Court |
Mack G. Hicks and Carl H. Griffin, both of Rome, for plaintiff in error.
Henderson Lanham, Sol. Gen., E. J. Clower, Sol. Gen., Chastine Parker, and Horace Clary, all of Rome, for defendant in error.
Syllabus Opinion by the Court.
Although neither of the two named mutual life insurance companies appeared in the indictment for murder as prosecutor, it was admitted in open court that an attorney who assisted the solicitor-general in the trial of the case was employed and paid by the insurance companies to assist the prosecution. It further appeared that the deceased held insurance policies in each of the said companies, in which policies the accused was named as beneficiary. This rendered the jurors who held policies in either one of the insurance companies disqualified to serve as jurors in the case. McElhannon v. State, 99 Ga. 672, 26 S.E. 501; Moore v. Farmers' Mutual Ins. Ass'n, 107 Ga. 199, 209, 33 S.E. 65; Lyens v. State, 133 Ga. 587, 66 S.E. 792; Campbell v. State, 144 Ga. 224, 87 S.E. 277; Fordham v. State,
148 Ga. 758, 98 S.E. 267; Whitworth v. State, 155 Ga. 395, 117 S.E. 450. The motion for new trial showing the foregoing facts, and complaining of the ruling denying a timely request by counsel for the accused that inquiry of all jurors be made as to whether or not they held policies in either of the named companies, and that all jurors holding such policies be held disqualified, and complaining that the foreman of the jury which convicted the accused was a policy holder in one of the named companies, showed reversible error, and the judgment overruling the motion for new trial must be reversed.
Judgment reversed.
All the Justices concur.
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
Shinal v. Toms
...court should have stricken this juror "to preserve public respect for the integrity of the judicial process"); Gossett v . State, 201 Ga. 809, 41 S.E.2d 308 (1947) (holding that it was reversible error not to disqualify jurors who held insurance policies from companies employing and paying ......
-
Gossett v. State
...judgment of the trial court refusing a new trial, because of alleged error relating to the disqualification of a juror. Gossett v. State, 201 Ga. 809, 41 S.E.2d 308. Upon second trial a verdict of guilty was returned with a recommendation of mercy. The defendant made a motion for a new tria......
-
Shipman v. Johnson, 34985
...the case because of policies held by the murder victim, where certain jurors held policies in the same insurance company. Gossett v. State, 201 Ga. 809, 41 S.E.2d 308. Relatives of contributors to a fund for the apprehension and prosecution of a coconspirator of the defendant are disqualifi......
-
Blevins v. State
...Ga. 587, 66 S.E. 792; O'Berry v. State, 153 Ga. 644(2), 113 S.E. 2; Harris v. State, 188 Ga. 745(2), 750, 4 S.E.2d 651; Gossett v. State, 201 Ga. 809, 41 S.E.2d 308; Tatum v. State, 206 Ga. 171, 177(3), 54 S.E.2d 518. But in this case the evidence which the accused introduced in support of ......