Gould v. Asylum

CourtUnited States State Supreme Court of Wisconsin
Writing for the CourtCOLE
Citation46 Wis. 106,50 N.W. 422
PartiesGOULD v. TAYLOR ORPHAN ASYLUM ET AL.
Decision Date14 January 1879

46 Wis. 106
50 N.W. 422

GOULD
v.
TAYLOR ORPHAN ASYLUM ET AL.1

Supreme Court of Wisconsin.

Jan. 14, 1879.


Appeal from circuit court, Racine county. Affirmed.

Petition of John F. Gould, administrator of Abner Martin, against the Taylor Orphan Asylum and others, for the construction of a will, etc. Judgment for defendants. Plaintiff appeals.

Emerline A. Taylor died in 1866, possessed of property valued at about $340,000, and her will was admitted to probate, and letters testamentary issued to her executors. There were a large number of bequests and devises of land. The third item was as follows: Third. I give and devise unto Mrs. C. A. Dyer, Mrs. Margaret Perrine, Mrs. George Murray, Mrs. John F. Gould, and Mrs. John Tapley, of the county of Racine, state of Wisconsin, the sum of $30,000, to hold in trust to erect an orphan asylum in or near the city of Racine, in the county of Racine, Wisconsin, and to support the same. Said asylum to be open for the reception of all orphan children in said county, and such other poor, neglected, and destitute children as the managers, by law or by their rules, may agree to receive. Said trust fund to be paid to such asylum as soon as one shall be duly incorporated and legally empowered to receive and use said fund for the purposes above specified.” Following is the thirty-eighth item: Thirty-Eighth. All the rest and residue of my estate left after paying the expenses of administration I give and devise unto my said executors, Rhodes, Murray, and Kelley, (whether said estate shall consist of real estate, personal estate, or mixed, or wherever situate,) to hold in trust for said contemplated orphan asylum for said county of Racine; the principal to be kept invested in such manner as will pay a good interest, but not to be used for any purpose; the interest or income only to be used for the maintenance and support of said asylum; the same to be paid to said asylum by my said executors as hereinbefore directed. I also hereby authorize my said executors to sell, either at public or private sale, any or all of my real estate, upon such terms as they shall deem best, and execute suitable conveyances therefor, --such real estate as not herein specifically devised.” The trustees accepted the trust, and at their instance an act of the legislature was passed, (P. & L. Laws Wis. 1867, c. 340,) incorporating them under the name of the “Taylor Orphan Asylum.” On petition of the executors the court made an order authorizing them to pay all the legacies named in the

[50 N.W. 423]

will, except the residuary legatee, but no notice of the application or order was given. In 1877 the court confirmed the final accounting of the executors, and discharged them from their trust. Early in 1878, John F. Gould, as executor of Abner Martin, father and sole heir at law of Emerline A. Taylor, filed a petition, alleging that he was entitled to the property described in the third and thirty-eighth articles of the will; that no notice had been given to him or to the heirs at law of Abner Martin of the order distributing the estate until long after it was made. In May, 1878, the court vacated its order of final settlement, so as to allow John F. Gould, as administrator, to be made a party, and present his claims. Another order was made on the same day, adjudging that the Taylor Orphan Asylum was entitled to the legacies mentioned in...

To continue reading

Request your trial
14 practice notes
  • Becker v. Chester
    • United States
    • United States State Supreme Court of Wisconsin
    • June 19, 1902
    ...justify our conclusion. Appeal of Chandler, 34 Wis. 505;Dodge v. Williams, 46 Wis. 70, 50 N. W. 1103, 1 N. W. 92;Gould v. Orphan Asylum, 46 Wis. 106, 50 N. W. 422;Ford v. Ford, 70 Wis. 19, 33 N. W. 188, 5 Am. St. Rep. 117;Harrington v. Pier, 105 Wis. 485, 82 N. W. 345, 50 L. R. A. 307, 76 A......
  • Harrington v. Pier
    • United States
    • United States State Supreme Court of Wisconsin
    • February 2, 1900
    ...as to real estate, not decided. 13. Dodge v. Williams, 1 N. W. 92, 50 N. W. 1103, 46 Wis. 70, and Gould v. Orphan Asylum, 50 N. W. 442, 46 Wis. 106, approved and followed. Cases prior and subsequent thereto in this court, reviewed, distinguished and harmonized therewith, except In re Fuller......
  • In re McGraw's Estate,
    • United States
    • New York Court of Appeals
    • November 27, 1888
    ...36 N. J. Eq. 141;Hesketh v. Murphy, Id. 304; Simpson v. Welcome, 72 Me. 496;Dodge v. Williams, 46 Wis. 70,1 N. W. Rep. 92;Gould v. Asylum, 46 Wis. 106;State v. Griffith, 2 Del. Ch. 392, 424;Stevens v. Shippen, 28 N. J. Eq. 487;De Camp v. Dobbins, 29 N. J. Eq. 36; Commissioners v. Rogers, 55......
  • Gunter v. City of Jackson, 22889
    • United States
    • United States State Supreme Court of Mississippi
    • January 2, 1923
    ...v. City of Jackson, 93 Miss. 366; St. Johns Military Academy v. Edwards, 143 Wis. 551, 139 A. S. R. 1123; Gould v. Taylor Orphans Asylum, 46 Wis. 106, 50 N.W. 422; Dodge v. Williams, 46 Wis. 70, 1 N.W. 92, 50 N.W. 1103; Pearson v. Lane, 17 Ves. Jr. 101; Montgomery v. Wyman, 130 Ill. 17, 22 ......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
14 cases
  • Becker v. Chester
    • United States
    • United States State Supreme Court of Wisconsin
    • June 19, 1902
    ...justify our conclusion. Appeal of Chandler, 34 Wis. 505;Dodge v. Williams, 46 Wis. 70, 50 N. W. 1103, 1 N. W. 92;Gould v. Orphan Asylum, 46 Wis. 106, 50 N. W. 422;Ford v. Ford, 70 Wis. 19, 33 N. W. 188, 5 Am. St. Rep. 117;Harrington v. Pier, 105 Wis. 485, 82 N. W. 345, 50 L. R. A. 307, 76 A......
  • Harrington v. Pier
    • United States
    • United States State Supreme Court of Wisconsin
    • February 2, 1900
    ...as to real estate, not decided. 13. Dodge v. Williams, 1 N. W. 92, 50 N. W. 1103, 46 Wis. 70, and Gould v. Orphan Asylum, 50 N. W. 442, 46 Wis. 106, approved and followed. Cases prior and subsequent thereto in this court, reviewed, distinguished and harmonized therewith, except In re Fuller......
  • In re McGraw's Estate,
    • United States
    • New York Court of Appeals
    • November 27, 1888
    ...36 N. J. Eq. 141;Hesketh v. Murphy, Id. 304; Simpson v. Welcome, 72 Me. 496;Dodge v. Williams, 46 Wis. 70,1 N. W. Rep. 92;Gould v. Asylum, 46 Wis. 106;State v. Griffith, 2 Del. Ch. 392, 424;Stevens v. Shippen, 28 N. J. Eq. 487;De Camp v. Dobbins, 29 N. J. Eq. 36; Commissioners v. Rogers, 55......
  • Gunter v. City of Jackson, 22889
    • United States
    • United States State Supreme Court of Mississippi
    • January 2, 1923
    ...v. City of Jackson, 93 Miss. 366; St. Johns Military Academy v. Edwards, 143 Wis. 551, 139 A. S. R. 1123; Gould v. Taylor Orphans Asylum, 46 Wis. 106, 50 N.W. 422; Dodge v. Williams, 46 Wis. 70, 1 N.W. 92, 50 N.W. 1103; Pearson v. Lane, 17 Ves. Jr. 101; Montgomery v. Wyman, 130 Ill. 17, 22 ......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT