Graham v. Wyoming Peace Officer Standards and Training Com'n

Decision Date04 June 1987
Docket NumberNo. 86-255,86-255
Citation737 P.2d 1060
PartiesH. Leroy GRAHAM, Chester C. Engstrom, and Gerald R. Colson, Petitioners, v. WYOMING PEACE OFFICER STANDARDS AND TRAINING COMMISSION, Respondent.
CourtWyoming Supreme Court

K. Craig Williams, Deputy County and Pros. Atty., Rawlins, for petitioners.

A.G. McClintock, Atty. Gen.; Gerald P. Luckhaupt, Asst. Atty. Gen., for respondent.

Before BROWN, C.J., and THOMAS, CARDINE, URBIGKIT, and MACY, JJ.

URBIGKIT, Justice.

In this district court certification from a decision of the Wyoming Peace Officer Standards and Training Commission (POST), we review a challenge initially instituted by three persons but now continued on appeal by only one ex-deputy sheriff. In claiming course analysis discrimination as a justification for nonattendance at the Wyoming Law Enforcement Academy, appellant challenged the application of the competency training program and appealed the commission's adverse decision by a petition for review in district court.

Anything litigated as diligently, antagonistically, and comprehensively as this conflict between the Carbon County Sheriff and POST perhaps deserves a more fitting conclusion, but unfortunately we find that the present request under the circumstance is for this court to issue an advisory opinion, and consequently we dismiss the appeal as moot.

Three deputy sheriffs, in the employ of the Carbon County Sheriff and at the direction of their boss, declined to participate in a Wyoming basic training program at the Wyoming Law Enforcement Academy as required by POST. This is the second of two lawsuits involving their rejection of the training program. The first, instituted by the State of Wyoming as quo warranto, culminated in a district court decision which challenged the continued employment of the three litigants but matured to an appeal status after this case and has since been dismissed by stipulation of the litigants that the issues were moot. Colson v. State ex rel. Meyer, No. 87-29. This case constitutes an appeal from the administrative agency first taken to the district court and then certified without hearing to this court pursuant to Rule 12.09, W.R.A.P.

The Wyoming Peace Officer Standards and Training Commission was established by Ch. 178, S.L. of Wyoming 1971 for the purpose of raising standards of peace officers within the state. As a stated purpose, the statute provides:

"(e) The commission shall establish standards for certification of peace officer training. The commission shall establish:

"(i) Requirements concerning courses of study, attendance, equipment and facilities for peace officer training;

"(ii) Qualifications for peace officer training instructors;

"(iii) Basic training requirements for peace officers appointed to probationary employment;

"(iv) Basic training requirements for nonprobationary peace officers appointed on other than a permanent basis. The commission shall establish a time within which basic training shall be completed following appointment on a nonpermanent basis for an officer to be eligible for continued or permanent employment;

"(v) Categories or classifications of advanced in-service training programs and minimum courses of study and attendance requirements with respect to the categories or classifications." Section 9-1-702, W.S.1977, 1986 Cum.Supp.

Approximately ten years after its establishment, the commission apparently determined that it was not adequately fulfilling its function, and adopted formal rules and regulations for required POST-certified training in order to be qualified as a peace officer.

Sheriff C.W. Ogburn of Carbon County and the agency came into well-publicized conflict about any requirement that deputy sheriff personnel in Carbon County should be obligated to seek training under the POST program or at the state Law Enforcement Academy. Sheriff Ogburn was defeated in the election of 1986, and two of the three deputies were hired by the successor Sheriff and recently completed the state training program at the Academy in compliance with the POST requirement. As a result, they are out of the lawsuit. The third deputy, H. Leroy Graham, was not retained by the new Sheriff and is not now employed as a peace officer as defined by Wyoming statute; the Attorney General, Honorable A.G. McClintock, has retired; Sheriff C.W. Ogburn, has been replaced by the electorate; and finally, a significant change in the membership of POST has occurred including the appointment of a new director. 1

In contending for continued vitality of the litigation, appellant Graham claims that a favorable decision for him would mean that he might then be training certified so that a new employer would be saved the time otherwise required to allow him to attend the Academy. Consequently, it would save time which would be missing from his availability to benefit the employer since he would not have to attend any training program, thus improving his potentiality for police work re-employment.

In response to the court's order to show cause why the appeal should not be dismissed as moot, appellant phrased this contention:

"Whether Mr. Graham is certified or not is an important issue which has significant repercussions on Mr. Graham's ability to be reemployed in law enforcement in the State of Wyoming in the future. Wyo.Stat. § 9-1-705 (1977) imposes on a department the costs of paying their officers' salaries while they receive training. An individual who has been certified as having completed basic is therefore in a better position for employment because it saves the prospective hiring department the costs of training. In addition, the State takes the position in this litigation, and the quo warranto, that Mr. Graham has used up the 2-year grace period allowed by Wyo.Stat. § 9-1-704 (1977) within which peace officers must receive their basic training after they are hired.

Someone who has not previously engaged in law enforcement could thus be hired by a department and put to work on a trial basis, but the Commission takes the position that Mr. Graham could not do so, and the State's existing quo warranto action gives credence to its threat to take action against him should he attempt to do so." (As noted, after filing of this response, the pending quo-warranto proceeding was dismissed by the parties as moot.)

In the original petition filed with POST, Graham requested by prayer:

" * * * [T]hat upon the hearing of this matter the Commission determine that the Petitioner has satisfactorily...

To continue reading

Request your trial
15 cases
  • JBC of Wyoming Corp. v. City of Cheyenne
    • United States
    • Wyoming Supreme Court
    • 21 December 1992
    ...court has said repeatedly that it will not issue advisory opinions, and we decline to do so now. Graham v. Wyoming Peace Officer Standards and Training Commission, Wyo., 737 P.2d 1060 (1987)." Brad Ragan Tire Co. v. Gearhart Industries, 744 P.2d 1125, 1126 (Wyo.1987). Our rule is that this ......
  • Price v. Sorrell
    • United States
    • Wyoming Supreme Court
    • 28 December 1989
    ...Corp., 745 P.2d 58 (Wyo.1987); Brad Ragan Tire Co. v. Gearhart Industries, 744 P.2d 1125 (Wyo.1987); Graham v. Wyoming Peace Officer Standards and Training Com'n., 737 P.2d 1060 (Wyo.1987); Reno Livestock Corp. v. Sun Oil Co. (Delaware), 638 P.2d 147 (Wyo.1981); Wallace v. Casper Adjustment......
  • In re SNK
    • United States
    • Wyoming Supreme Court
    • 4 November 2003
    ...do so now." State Bd. of Equalization v. Jackson Hole Ski Corp., 745 P.2d 58, 59 (Wyo. 1987) (citing Graham v. Wyoming Peace Officer Standards and Training Com'n, 737 P.2d 1060 (Wyo.1987)); see also Willowbrook Ranch, Inc. v. Nugget Exploration, Inc., 896 P.2d 769, 772 State Dep't of Rev. v......
  • Wyoming Coalition v. Wyoming Game & Fish Com'n
    • United States
    • Wyoming Supreme Court
    • 6 June 1994
    ...Mari v. Rawlins Nat'l Bank, 794 P.2d 85 (Wyo.1990); Foster v. Wicklund, 778 P.2d 118 (Wyo.1989); Graham v. Wyoming Peace Officer Standards and Training Comm'n, 737 P.2d 1060 (Wyo.1987); In Interest of AJ, 736 P.2d 721 (Wyo.1987); Gulf Oil Corp. v. Wyoming Oil and Gas Conservation Comm'n, 69......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT