Grant v. State, 87-2732
| Decision Date | 05 July 1989 |
| Docket Number | No. 87-2732,87-2732 |
| Citation | 14 Fla. L. Weekly 1629,547 So.2d 952 |
| Parties | 14 Fla. L. Weekly 1629 Daniel GRANT, Jr., Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee. |
| Court | Florida District Court of Appeals |
Bennett H. Brummer, Public Defender, and Paul D. Novack, Sp. Asst. Public Defender, for appellant.
Robert A. Butterworth, Atty. Gen., and Joni B. Braunstein, Asst. Atty. Gen., for appellee.
Before SCHWARTZ, C.J., and NESBITT and LEVY, JJ.
In November of 1986, Daniel Grant, Jr., the defendant, attempted to steal a gun in order to sell it and buy "crack" cocaine. The gun was in the back pocket of a sleeping 57 year old gas station attendant, who awoke when the defendant tried to steal his gun, whereupon the defendant knocked him to the ground, beat him, and succeeded in pulling the gun from the attendant's pants. The defendant then stood over the attendant, and shot him once in the head at close range, killing him. The defendant was found guilty of second degree murder, strong arm robbery, and illegal possession of a firearm by a convicted felon. Although the sentencing guidelines called for a sentence of between 17-22 years, 1 the trial judge sentenced the defendant to 25 years incarceration, suspending three years during which the defendant would be placed on probation. The trial court based the upward departure upon the escalating pattern and the temporal proximity of the offenses committed, and also upon the vulnerability of the victim and the manner in which the murder was committed. We find the listed reasons for departure invalid under the facts of this case and reverse.
Our review of the record reflects that neither the defendant's prior criminal history nor the temporal proximity of the offenses committed demonstrates the defendant's involvement in a persistent or escalating pattern of criminal activity sufficient to justify departure. In 1981, the defendant was convicted of disorderly conduct and resisting arrest without violence. In 1982 he was convicted for resisting arrest without violence and hindrance of a MTA bus driver. In 1983, he was convicted of possession of marijuana and in January of 1986 he was convicted of criminal mischief. In December of 1986, he was convicted of disorderly conduct and a bench warrant was issued. These five convictions over a period of five years were all for misdemeanors and do not support either a finding of an escalating pattern of criminal activity or a persistent pattern of criminal activity based upon the timing of the offenses.
Finally, the fact that the victim was 57 years old and had been sleeping prior to the attack does not establish the victim's vulnerability as a proper reason for departure. Se...
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
Graham v. State, 89-292
...therefore more vulnerable. This factor alone is not a clear and convincing reason to depart. 492 So.2d at 1309. See also Grant v. State, 547 So.2d 952 (Fla. 3d DCA 1989); Brown v. State, 511 So.2d 719 (Fla. 1st DCA 4. The victim M.K. was vulnerable because the defendant stood in a position ......
-
Grant v. State, 3D00-2411.
...court order. This court has already held that the assessment of legal constraint points was proper in this case. Grant v. State, 547 So.2d 952, 952 n. 1 (Fla. 3d DCA 1989). 1. After defendant-appellant Grant filed his notice of appeal, he filed a motion in the trial court to dismiss his Rul......