Grapin v. Grapin
| Decision Date | 17 May 1984 |
| Docket Number | No. 63869,63869 |
| Citation | 450 So.2d 853 |
| Parties | Beverly GRAPIN, Petitioner, v. Bertram GRAPIN, Respondent. |
| Court | Florida Supreme Court |
Brian R. Hersh of Hersh & Bernstein, Miami, for petitioner.
Norman S. Klein and Linda A. Fenner of Schwartz, Klein, Steinhardt, Weiss & Weinstein, North Miami Beach, for respondent.
Marsha B. Elser, Chairman, Brenda M. Abrams, Chairman-Elect, Cynthia L. Greene of Melvyn B. Frumkes, P.A., Miami, and C. Edwin Rude, Jr., of Ervin, Varn, Jacobs, Odom & Kitchen, Tallahassee, for The Family Law Section of The Florida Bar, amicus curiae.
We have for review Grapin v. Grapin, 430 So.2d 926 (Fla. 3d DCA 1983), because of conflict with Nicolay v. Nicolay, 387 So.2d 500 (Fla. 2d DCA), review dismissed, 392 So.2d 1377 (Fla.1980). We have jurisdiction under article V, section 3(b)(3) of the Florida Constitution and approve the decision under review.
In a 1982 dissolution action the trial court entered a final judgment that included a provision requiring Mr. Grapin to pay the expenses of his emancipated daughter's college education. The district court reversed the education costs provision in the final judgment on the grounds that a parent has no legal duty to provide post-majority support to an otherwise healthy child, absent either a finding of legal dependence or a binding contractual agreement by the parent to pay such support, neither of which conditions occurred here. We agree that a trial court may not order post-majority support simply because the child is in college and the divorced parent can afford to pay. See also Thomas v. Thomas, 427 So.2d 259 (Fla. 5th DCA 1983); Jones v. Jones, 421 So.2d 815 (Fla. 4th DCA 1982); Dwyer v. Dwyer, 327 So.2d 74 (Fla. 1st DCA 1976); Kowalski v. Kowalski, 315 So.2d 497 (Fla. 2d DCA), cert. dismissed, 319 So.2d 31 (Fla.1975); Krogen v. Krogen, 320 So.2d 483 (Fla. 3d DCA 1975).
The second district took a contrary position in Nicolay. There the district court affirmed an increase in alimony based upon the wife's need for funds to provide a college education for her children, as expected by the parties' standard of living during the marriage. 387 So.2d at 506. We disagree with this indirect method of compelling unwilling divorced parents to provide college costs for their capable adult children.
While most parents willingly assist their adult children in obtaining a higher education that is increasingly necessary in today's fast-changing world, any duty to do so is a moral rather than a legal one. Parents who remain married while their children attend college may continue supporting their children even beyond age twenty-one, but such support may be conditional or may be withdrawn at any time, and no one may bring an action to enforce continued payments. It would be fundamentally unfair for courts to enforce these moral obligations of support only against divorced parents while other parents may do as they choose. As Judge Cowart pointed out in his dissent to a decision affirming a...
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
Loughlin v. Loughlin
...home beyond time child reaches age of majority because husband's obligation for support terminates at that time); Grapin v. Grapin, 450 So.2d 853, 854 (Fla.1984) ("a parent has no legal duty to provide post-majority support to an otherwise healthy child, absent either a finding of legal dep......
-
Milne v. Milne
...foster a close relationship between parents and children." Horan, supra, at 607. See also Moore, supra, at 189.9 See, e.g., Grapin v. Grapin, 450 So.2d 853 (Fla.1984):While most parents willingly assist their adult children in obtaining a higher education ... such support may be conditional......
-
Ex parte Tabor
...in setting child support because the child would not be a minor); In re Marriage of Plummer, 735 P.2d 165 (Col. 1987); Grapin v. Grapin, 450 So.2d 853 (Fla.1984) (holding that the duty of a parent to provide for the college education of a child is a moral, rather than a legal, The State, by......
-
McLeod v. Starnes
...adult citizens with legal means to overcome the difficulties they encounter in pursuing that end.Id. at 269–70; see Grapin v. Grapin, 450 So.2d 853, 854 (Fla.1984) (recognizing that the “societal ideal of continued parental support for the education and training” of adult children did not c......
-
Appellate standards of review.
...review). See Walter v. Walter, 464 So. 2d 538, 539 (Fla. 1985). An example of the former type of order is discussed in Grapin v. Grapin, 450 So. 2d 853 (Fla. 1984), wherein a trial court order expanding support obligations for healthy, post-majority, children was reversed on purely legal gr......
-
THE LAW OF EMERGING ADULTS.
...to apply." Nev. Rev. Stat. [section] 125B. 110 (2018). (85.) See Buhai, supra note 56, at 716-17. (86.) Compare, e.g., Grapin v. Grapin, 450 So. 2d 853, 854 (Fla. 1984) ("[A]ny duty to [provide higher education for a child] is a moral rather than legal one."), with CAL. FAM. CODE [section] ......