Grasso v. Angerami
| Decision Date | 23 December 1991 |
| Citation | 588 N.E.2d 76,79 N.Y.2d 813,580 N.Y.S.2d 178 |
| Parties | , 588 N.E.2d 76 John N. GRASSO, Appellant, v. Kelly M. ANGERAMI, Respondent. |
| Court | New York Court of Appeals Court of Appeals |
The order of the Appellate Division, 173 A.D.2d 981, 569 N.Y.S.2d 496, should be affirmed, with costs.
In opposition to defendant's motion for summary judgment pursuant to Insurance Law § 5102(d), plaintiff tendered proof of "serious injury" in inadmissible form, namely an unsworn doctor's report. Inasmuch as plaintiff did not offer any excuse for his failure to provide the medical report in proper form, we need not consider whether proof of serious injury in inadmissible form is sufficient to defeat a motion for summary judgment pursuant to Insurance Law § 5102(d), if an acceptable excuse for the deficiency is offered.
On review of submissions pursuant to section 500.4 of the Rules of the Court of Appeals (22 NYCRR 500.4), order affirmed, with costs, in a memorandum.
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
Cuomo v. Greenberg
...excuse for the failure to do so. Alvarez, 68 N.Y.2d at 324, 508 N.Y.S.2d at 925, 501 N.E.2d 572;see Grasso v. Angerami, 79 N.Y.2d 813, 580 N.Y.S.2d 178, 588 N.E.2d 76 (1991); Zuckerman v. City of New York, 49 N.Y.2d 557, 562, 427 N.Y.S.2d 595, 598, 404 N.E.2d 718, 720 (1980); Friends of Ani......
-
Burgos v. 205 E.D. Food Corp., Index No: 15760/06
...issue fact, said affirmation would suffice to defeat summary judgment. Id.; See, Indig v. Finkelstein, 23 N.Y.2d 728 (1968); Graso v. Angerami, 79 N.Y.2d 813 (1991). When deciding a summary judgment motion the role of the Court is to make determinations as to the existence of bonafide issue......
-
Bernier v. Torres
...Berkowitz and Demetrius, are without any probative value since those records were not properly sworn or affirmed. See, Grasso v. Angerami, 79 N.Y.2d 813 (1999); Magid v. Lincoln Services Corp., 60 A.D.3d 1008 (2nd Dept. 2009); Chanda v. Varughese, 67 A.D.3d 947 (2nd Dept. 2009); Sutton v. Y......
-
Turcios-Rodriguez v. Velasquez
...of a plaintiff's 2 examining physician or chiropractor are insufficient to defeat a motion for summary judgment (see, Grasso v Angerami, 79 N.Y.2d 813, 580 N.Y.S.2d 178 [1991]). However, a plaintiff may rely upon unsworn MRI reports if they have been referred to by a defendant's examining e......