Graton v. United Sec. Ins. Co., 86CA0121
| Decision Date | 11 June 1987 |
| Docket Number | No. 86CA0121,86CA0121 |
| Citation | 740 P.2d 533 |
| Parties | Nellie P. GRATON, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. UNITED SECURITY INSURANCE COMPANY, Defendant-Appellee. . II |
| Court | Colorado Court of Appeals |
Ozer, Spriggs & Trueax, P.C., John W. Trueax, Denver, for plaintiff-appellant.
Anderson, Campbell & Laugesen, P.C., J. Fern Black, Georgia N. Parker, Denver, for defendant-appellee.
Plaintiff, Nellie P. Graton, appeals the district court's entry of summary judgment for defendant, United Security Insurance Company. We affirm.
Plaintiff was injured in an automobile accident in Las Vegas, Nevada, on August 3, 1980. Because she was a passenger, her no-fault insurance policy required her to notify her insurer, defendant United Security, promptly of any injury arising from the accident. See § 10-4-707(1)(a), C.R.S. Plaintiff did not consult an attorney about her injury until December 10, 1984, and did not notify defendant of the accident until February 13, 1985.
After defendant rejected her claim as untimely, she brought this suit, alleging that defendant acted in bad faith in denying it. The district court granted defendant's motion for summary judgment and dismissed the action with prejudice.
Plaintiff contends that the trial court erred in granting summary judgment for defendant because a material question of fact exists whether she had a justifiable excuse for failing to notify defendant of her claim within a reasonable time. She argues that her delay was justified because she was unaware of the provisions of her own policy, and because she relied upon a statement made by an agent for a different insurer to the driver, who was injured in the same accident. This contention is without merit.
Failure to notify an insurer within a reasonable time constitutes a breach of contract relieving the insurer from liability thereunder unless the insured establishes a justifiable excuse or extenuating circumstances explaining the delay. Certified Indemnity Co. v. Thun, 165 Colo. 354, 439 P.2d 28 (1968); Colard v. American Family Mutual Insurance Co., 709 P.2d 11 (Colo.App.1985). When the facts are undisputed and only one inference can be drawn from them, what constitutes reasonable time for giving notice is a question of law. Certified Indemnity Co. v. Thun, supra.
Here, plaintiff's failure to notify her insurer for nearly four and one-half years after the accident was unreasonable as a matter of law. See Certified Indemnity Co. v. Thun, supra. Moreover, any...
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
Clementi v. Nationwide Mut. Fire Ins. Co., No. 99SC500.
...942 P.2d 1370, 1373 (Colo.Ct.App.1997); Haller, 936 P.2d at 604 (Colo.Ct.App.1997); Hansen, 779 P.2d at 1362; Graton v. United Sec. Ins. Co., 740 P.2d 533, 534 (Colo.Ct.App. 1987); Emcasco, 678 P.2d at In Marez, this court refused to depart from the traditional approach and require an insur......
-
Hansen v. Barmore, 87CA1518
...for giving notice is a question of law. Certified Indemnity Co. v. Thun, 165 Colo. 354, 439 P.2d 28 (1968); Graton v. United Security Insurance Co., 740 P.2d 533 (Colo.App.1987). Here, the record reflects that Hansen's attorney wrote to Allstate concerning his representation on December 11,......
-
Public Service Co. of Colorado v. Wallis and Companies
...obligations without regard to prejudice. See Marez v. Dairyland Insurance Co., 638 P.2d 286 (Colo.1981); Graton v. United Security Insurance Co., 740 P.2d 533 (Colo.App.1987). Citing a majority of jurisdictions that have considered insurance coverage claims for environmental contamination a......
-
St. Paul Fire and Marine Ins. Co. v. Estate of Hunt
...the insured has a justifiable excuse. See Certified Indemnity Co. v. Thun, 165 Colo. 354, 439 P.2d 28 (1968); Graton v. United Security Insurance Co. 740 P.2d 533 (Colo.App.1987); cf. Marez v. Dairyland Insurance Co., 638 P.2d 286 (Colo.1981). We are also aware that other jurisdictions have......
-
City of Littleton, Wallis, and Insurance For Multi-Year Liability Claims
...Washington v. Federal Kemper Ins. Co., 482 A.2d 503, 505-06 (Md.App. 1984); Foundation Reserve Ins. Co. v. Esquibel, 607 P.2d 1150, 1152 (1980). Marez v. Daryland Ins. Co., 638 P.2d 286, 290-91 (Colo. 1981); United Services Auto. Ass'n v. Allstate Ins. Co., 6......
-
CHAPTER 7 CURRENT ENVIRONMENTAL INSURANCE COVERAGE ISSUES
...insured establishes a justifiable excuse or extenuating circumstances explaining the delay." Graton v. United Security Insurance Company, 740 P.2d 533 (Colo. App. 1987). Prejudice to the insurer is not a consideration, regardless of whether notice is excused. USAA v. Allstate Insurance Comp......
-
City of Littleton, Wallis, and Insurance for Multi-year Liability Claims
...Mut. Ins. Co., 709 P.2d 11, 15 (Colo.App. 1985); see generally, 29 Am.Jur. 829, Insurance, § 1105. 10. Graton v. United Security Ins. Co., 740 P.2d 533, (Colo.App. 1987). 11. Colard, supra, note 9 at 15; Barnes v. Waco Scaffolding and Equip., 589 P.2d 505, 507 (Colo.App. 1978). But see, Hal......