Grayson Variety Store, Inc. v. Shaffer

Decision Date29 April 1966
Citation402 S.W.2d 424
PartiesGRAYSON VARIETY STORE, INC., Appellant, v. Ruby Ann SHAFFER, an infant, etc., et al., Appellees.
CourtUnited States State Supreme Court — District of Kentucky

Henry R. Wilhoit, Jr., Thomas D. Theobald, Jr., Grayson, for appellant.

W. H. Counts, Olive Hill, for appellees.

CULLEN, Commissioner.

Having sustained a motion for an appeal, we have before us the appeal of Grayson Variety Store, Inc., from a judgment awarding, as damages for false imprisonment, $500 each to the appellees Ruby Ann Shaffer, Valerie Jean Shaffer and Ada Lynn Shaffer. One of the contentions of the appellant is that its motions for a directed verdict and for judgment n.o.v. should have been sustained because the evidence showed there was no imprisonment or detention against will. We think the contention is well taken.

The three appellees, two of whom were age 15 and the other age 10, were shopping in appellant's self-service variety store, in the course of which they spent a few minutes at the cosmetic counter, picking up and examining compacts. A clerk, observing them from a nearby counter, thought she saw one of the girls put a compact in a shopping bag she was carrying. Directly the girls left the store and the clerk then reported to the manager that they had taken a compact without paying for it. The manager left the store in search of the girls and he encountered them on the sidewalk a short distance from the store. He asked one of the girls what she had done with the compact she took, and she replied that she had put it back on the counter. He then said, 'You better come back to the store with me, we have something to discuss,' or he said, 'Would you girls come back to the store with me a minute, I have a matter to discuss with you,' or he said, 'Will you girls please come back down to the store, we have a little matter to discuss.' The girls returned with him to the store, where the clerk identified them as the ones who had taken the compact. The girls then suggested that their purses and shopping bag be searched. Upon search by the clerk no compact was discovered, whereupon the manager said he was 'sorry' and the girls left the store.

The girls testified that when the manager encountered them on the sidewalk he did not threaten them, touch them, speak in a loud or rough voice, or make any show of force; that they were not placed in fear, they did not feel that he was going to use any force on them, and they returned to the store with him 'voluntarily.' When they were back in the store they were not detained or held by threat or by force; they merely were asked about having taken the compact and they then asked that their purses and shopping bag be searched. The...

To continue reading

Request your trial
18 cases
  • Sanders v. City of Pembroke
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — Western District of Kentucky
    • August 6, 2020
    ...justification, authority or privilege." Banks v. Fritsch, 39 S.W.3d 474, 479 (Ky. Ct. App. 2001) (citing Grayson Variety Store, Inc. v. Shaffer, 402 S.W.2d 424 (Ky. 1960); Great Atl. & Pac. Tea Co. v. Billups, 69 S.W.2d 5 (Ky. 1934); Ford Motor Credit Co. v. Gibson, 566 S.W.2d 154 (Ky. Ct. ......
  • Kelly v. West Cash & Carry Bldg. Materials
    • United States
    • Court of Appeal of Louisiana — District of US
    • October 20, 1999
    ...they are spoken is not deprived of freedom of action. Ford Motor Credit Co. v. Gibson, 566 S.W.2d 154 (Ky.1977); Grayson Variety Store, Inc. v. Shaffer, 402 S.W.2d 424 (Ky.1966). In Dominguez v. Globe Discount City, Inc., 470 S.W.2d 919 (Tex.Civ.App.1971), the plaintiff was ordered about by......
  • Hernandez v. Theriot
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — Middle District of Louisiana
    • August 1, 2016
    ...they are spoken is not deprived of freedom of action.Ford Motor Credit Co. v. Gibson, 566 S.W.2d 154 (Ky.1977); Grayson Variety Store, Inc. v. Shaffer, 402 S.W.2d 424 (Ky.1966).39 The seizure of a person, as described in United States v. Mendenhall, is whether, "in view of all the circumsta......
  • McDONALD'S CORP. v. Ogborn
    • United States
    • Kentucky Court of Appeals
    • January 25, 2010
    ...without such person's consent and against his will, whether done by actual violence, threats or otherwise." Grayson Variety Store, Inc. v. Shaffer, 402 S.W.2d 424, 425 (Ky.1966) (citations omitted). Restraint constituting a false imprisonment may arise out of words, acts, gestures, or the l......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT