Great Am. Indem. Co. v. Elledge
| Decision Date | 21 January 1959 |
| Docket Number | No. A-6910,A-6910 |
| Citation | 320 S.W.2d 328,159 Tex. 288 |
| Parties | GREAT AMERICAN INDEMNITY COMPANY, Petitioner, v. Opal Mae ELLEDGE et al., Respondents. |
| Court | Texas Supreme Court |
Kemper & Kemper, Houston, for petitioner.
Joseph Kirchheimer, Houston, for respondents.
The trial court instructed a verdict in favor of petitioner, and the Court of Civil Appeals reversed and remanded the cause for a new trial. 312 S.W.2d 722. We agree with the Court of Civil Appeals that the statement made by the deceased employee to his wife and overheard by Barbara Jean Noack on the night of September 3, 1956, is admissible as a declaration tending to show the state of mind and immediate purpose of the declarant on that night. See Prater v. Traders & General Ins. Co., Tex.Civ.App., 83 S.W.2d 1038 (no writ); McCormick & Ray, Texas Law of Evidence, 2nd ed. 1956, Vol. 1, p. 639, § 868. This testimony, the stipulation of counsel, and the other circumstances established by the evidence raise an issue of fact as to whether the deceased sustained his accidental injury in the course of his employment.
It is our opinion, however, that the trial court properly excluded evidence of the statement made by Paul A. Pfeiffer, the mill superintendent, in the presence of David Lee Elledge and C. B. Massey. No predicate was laid for its admission as a declaration against interest, and a statement by the employer does not constitute an admission by the defendant insurance carrier in a case of this kind. From the standpoint of Pfeiffer, the only exciting event that had occurred was the discovery, and possibly his observation, of the body of the deceased. The declaration which he made does not describe, explain or relate in any way to that event, and therefore is not admissible as res gestae. See American General Ins. Co. v. Coloman, Tex., 303 S.W.2d 370; McCormick & Ray, Vol. 1, p. 698, § 918.
The application for writ of error is refused, no reversible error.
HAMILTON, J., not sitting.
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
Pacific Emp. Indem. Co. v. Aguirre
...case has been cited with approval by our appellate courts and in a per curiam opinion by the Supreme Court in Great American Indemnity Co. v. Elledge, 159 Tex. 288, 320 S.W.2d 328. Dr. James P. Fleming testified in part by deposition as 'Q. Have you had occasion to see professionally a pati......
-
Walters v. American States Ins. Co.
...upon Elledge v. Great American Indemnity Co., 312 S.W.2d 722 (Tex.Civ.App.--Houston 1958), writ ref'd n.r.e. per curiam, 159 Tex. 288, 320 S.W.2d 328 (1959). That was an instance of a night watchman's unexplained death on the premises of his employer. Again, this court, without indulging a ......
-
Millers Mut. Fire Ins. Co. of Dallas v. Scott
...255 S.W.2d 502), and in Elledge v. Great American Indemnity Co., 312 S.W.2d 722 (Tex.Civ.App.--Houston, 1958, writ ref'd, n.r.e., 159 Tex. 288, 320 S.W.2d 328), the court held that the facts justified the indulgence of the presumption that the employee was in the course of his employment. M......
-
Gabler v. Minnesota Mut. Life Ins. Co.
...the issue of good faith. Davis v. Argonaut Southwest Insurance Company, 464 S.W.2d 102 (Tex.Sup.1971); Great American Indemnity Company v. Elledge, 159 Tex. 288, 320 S.W.2d 328 (1959); Fulmer v. State of Texas, 445 S.W.2d 546 (Tex.Civ.App.-Fort Worth 1969, ref'd n.r.e.); Liberty Mutual Insu......