Great Northern Ry. Co. v. State
Decision Date | 08 May 1928 |
Docket Number | 21092,21093. |
Parties | GREAT NORTHERN RY. CO. v. STATE (two cases. |
Court | Washington Supreme Court |
Appeal from Superior Court, Thurston County; John M. Wilson, Judge.
Separate actions by the Great Northern Railway Company against the State, and by plaintiff named against defendant named. Judgments for plaintiff in each case, and defendant in each case appeals. Affirmed.
John H Dunbar and L. B. Donley, both of Olympia, for the state.
Thomas Balmer, Charles S. Albert, and Edwin C. Matthias, all of Seattle, for respondent.
C. H Winders, L. B. da Ponte, A. E. Simon, Palmer, Askren & Brethorst, and E. B. Palmer, all of Seattle, amici curiae.
These two cases on appeal, being substantially alike, were treated by the parties as one case. The actions are brought by respondents to recover certain corporation excise taxes paid to the state pursuant to provisions of chapter 149, Laws Ex. Sess. 1925, amending section 3841, Rem. Comp. Stat., section 3 of which chapter reads:
Also to recover certain filing fees paid to the secretary of state pursuant to the same chapter.
Section 1 of that act provides for filing fees graded according to capitalization of both foreign and domestic corporations desiring to do business in this state, and reads:
Chapter 147, Laws Ex. Sess. 1925, section 3853, Rem. Comp. Stat., is also involved, which requires every foreign corporation desiring to do business in the state to file, besides its charter or corporate articles, 'a certified copy of each and all of the amendments or supplements to such charter, * * * and a certified copy of each and all of its certificates of increase or decrease of its capital stock.'
The fees applying in connection therewith are fixed by chapter 149, supra.
The complaint alleges that respondent is a railway company engaged in interstate commerce with an authorized capital stock of $250,000,000; that it has been engaged in its business in the state for more than 30 years, and that until 1897 no annual license fee was imposed by the state upon either domestic or foreign corporations, and that by chapter 70, Laws of 1897, an annual license fee of $10 was imposed upon every corporation having capital stock; and was amended by chapter 140, Laws of 1907, by increasing the license fee to $15 per year, and further amended by chapter 144, Laws of 1923, by making provision for the payment of certain annual license fees in proportion to the authorized capital stock of the corporation at the same rates as those prescribed in section 3, chapter 149, Laws Ex. Sess. 1925, supra, on capital up to and including $2,000,000, but above $2,000,000 the license fee prescribed was at the rate of $1 for each $1,000,000 or fraction thereof of the authorized capital; that this was again amended by the present law above set forth increasing the fee imposed upon corporations having capital stock above $2,000,000 from $1 to $10 for each $1,000,000 or fraction thereof, with a proviso, however, that in no case should the total amount of such annual license fee exceed $3,000, and further providing that the annual fee required to be paid to the department of public works by any public service company shall be deducted from the annual fee provided herein, and the excess only shall be collected under this act. It is then alleged that respondent has paid to the department of public works the sum of $1,500 as a public service company, and that, upon the basis of section 3, chapter 149, supra, respondent has paid as follows:
Upon the first $2,000,000.00 of capital stock ... $ 150 00 Upon the remaining $248,000,000.00 .............. 2,480 00 --------- Total ....................................... $2,630 00 Less a deduction of the annual fee required to be paid by the department of public works .......................................... 1,500 00 --------- Leaving the amount of the annual license fee demanded of respondent the sum of ......... $1,130 00
It is then alleged that respondent's authorized capital represents its property holdings in many states, not more than 20 per cent. of its property being located in this state, and that it also owns other property and securities in other companies located outside this state, and that on December 31, 1926, the estimated value of its properties in this state was approximately $104,000,000, and of the assessed value of $76,900,000, and that its total operating revenue in this state for the calendar year 1926 was about $7,000,000.
It is also alleged that, because of serious results by way of...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
CHICAGO, M., ST. P. & PR CO. v. Hedges, 511E-514E
...issues bear different relations. Local corporations are differently related to the state than foreign corporations. Great Northern R. Co. v. State, 147 Wash. 630, 267 P. 506; Spokane International Ry. Co. v. State, 162 Wash. 395, 299 P. 362. And all have other statuses than the N. P., opera......
-
State ex rel. Borden Co. v. Dammann
...L. Ed. 372, 49 A. L. R. 713. Such decision was followed in O'Gara Coal Co. v. Emmerson, 326 Ill. 18, 156 N. E. 814,Great Northern Ry. Co. v. State, 147 Wash. 630, 267 P. 506, and a number of other state cases. The trial court, by an illustration, clearly demonstrated the inequality of the t......
-
State v. Azel Meadows Realty Co
...basis. The Air-Way decision has been followed in O'Gara, etc., v. Emmerson, 326 111. 18, 156 N. E. 814; Great Northern Ry. Co. v. State, 147 Wash. 630, 267 P. 506; and State ex rel. Borden v. Dammann (Wis.) 224 N. W. 139. The state's counsel, in their well-prepared brief, seek to distinguis......
-
State v. Azel Meadows Realty Co.
... ... tax than on domestic corporations. Cooley, Taxation (14th ... Ed.) vol. 1, § 359. Such has been the view of that great ... tribunal, the United States Supreme Court, from the early ... case of Paul v. Virginia, 8 Wall. 168, 19 L.Ed. 357, ... down to Horn Silver ... The ... Air-Way decision has been followed in O'Gara, etc., ... v. Emmerson, 326 Ill. 18, 156 N.E. 814; Great ... Northern Ry. Co. v. State, 147 Wash. 630, 267 P. 506; ... and State ex rel. Borden v. Dammann (Wis.) 224 N.W ... 139. The state's counsel, in their ... ...