Great Southern Life Ins. Co. v. Churchwell
Citation | 216 P. 676,91 Okla. 157,28 A.L.R. 97,1923 OK 418 |
Decision Date | 26 June 1923 |
Docket Number | 11581. |
Parties | GREAT SOUTHERN LIFE INS. CO. ET AL. v. CHURCHWELL. |
Court | Supreme Court of Oklahoma |
Syllabus by the Court.
If the language of a life or accident policy does not express an exception, when fairly interpreted, the courts will not write an exception into it by interpretation, for the purpose of exempting the insurer from liability after death or accident.
If a policy is so drawn as to require interpretation and to be fairly susceptible of two different constructions, the one will be adopted that is most favorable to the insured.
The burden of proof rests upon the insurer to establish the fact that death or injury has resulted from one of the excepted clauses enumerated in a policy of accident insurance.
If an accident policy contains no provision excepting such hazards and by chance, without the design, consent, or co-operation of the insured, he is injured or killed as a result of a hazard incident to his occupation, his injury or death properly may be said to have been caused by accidental means.
Though the means whereby a personal injury or death is caused were put into operation with the design or intention of injuring or killing one or more persons, if chance determines what particular person or persons are injured or killed in consequence of the use of those means, as to a person so injured or killed without his fault, consent, or co-operation, such means are to be regarded as accidental.
The death of an insured caused by being struck by a bullet fired by the enemy, while he is engaged in battle, and while serving under draft in the army of the United States as a soldier against Germany, held to have resulted from bodily injury sustained and effected directly through external, violent, and accidental means, within the terms of the policy.
Commissioners' Opinion, Division No. 5.
Appeal from District Court, Jackson County; Frank Mathews, Judge.
Action by L. B. Churchwell against the Great Southern Life Insurance Company and another. From a judgment for plaintiff defendants appeal. Affirmed.
Embry Johnson & Tolbert, of Oklahoma City, for plaintiffs in error.
S. B Garrett, of Mangum, for defendant in error.
This was an action by the defendant in error, the beneficiary named in a policy issued February 7, 1917, whereby the plaintiff in error the Oklahoma National Life Insurance Company insured the life of Omar Churchwell in the sum of $1,000, and the plaintiff in error Great Southern Life Insurance Company reinsured and underwrote the policy under the laws of the state of Texas and the state of Oklahoma, on the 31st day of July, 1918. Under the policy the plaintiffs in error obligated themselves by the following provision contained in the policy:
"Upon receipt of due proof of the death of the insured resulting directly, independently, and exclusively of any and all other causes from bodily injuries effected solely through external, violent, and purely accidental means (homicide or self-destruction, sane or insane, not included), and occurring within 20 days after such injuries, the amount payable upon surrender for cancellation and in full satisfaction of this policy shall be $2,000."
The death of the insured having occurred, the insurer, after receipt by it of the prescribed notice of the death, offered to pay $1,000, which the beneficiary was willing to accept without prejudice to her claim, asserted in this action, of the right to recover an additional $1,000 under the above-quoted "double indemnity" provision of the policy.
The claim asserted in the petition was duly resisted by the plaintiffs in error, and by agreement of parties the cause was tried to the court without the intervention of a jury, upon an agreed statement of facts and contentions of the parties, which was signed by the attorneys for the respective parties and submitted to the court for its decision, as follows:
Double Indemnity.
'Assumption of Policy.
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Continental Cas. Co. v. Goodwin
...... . . 2. A. life insurance policy is not avoided by reason of the insured. ... See Oklahoma Nat. Life Ins. Co. v. Norton, 44 Okl. 783, 145 P. 1138, L.R.A.1915E, ; Great Southern Life. Ins. Co. v. Churchwell, 91 Okl. 157, 216 P. ......
-
National Life & Acc. Ins. Co. of Nashville, Tenn. v. May
...... Assurance Corporation v. Hymes, 77 Okl. 20, 185 P. 1085,. 8 A. L. R. 318; Great Southern Life Insurance Co. v. Churchwell, 91 Okl. 157, 216 P. 676, 28 A. L. R. 97. This is also ......
-
American Ins. Union v. Beavers
......life policy is ambiguous, construction most favorable to. insured should be ...167, 44 S.Ct. 90, 91, 68 L.Ed. 235, 31 A. L. R. 102; Great Southern. Life Ins. Co. v. Churchwell, 91 Okl. 157, 216 P. 676, 28. A. ......
-
Baker v. Standard Acc. Ins. Co.
...... said Henry Baker should lose his life through external,. violent, and accidental means, the said defendant ... Limited, v. Hymes, 77 Okl. 20, 185 P. 1085, 8 A. L. R. 318; Great Southern Life Insurance Co. v. Churchwell,. 91 Okl. 157, 216 P. 676, 28 ......