Green County v. Howard
Citation | 127 Ky. 379 |
Parties | Green County v. Howard |
Decision Date | 02 November 1907 |
Court | Court of Appeals of Kentucky |
Appeal from Green Circuit Court.
From a judgment sustaining defendant's demurrer to the petition plaintiff appeals — Reversed.
NOGGLE & GRAHAM and W. G. HOWELL for appellant.
JEFF HENRY for appellee.
On January 3, 1898, the office of sheriff in Green County being vacant, A. W. Howard was duly appointed tax collector to collect the county levy for that year. He qualified and gave bond, and entered upon the discharge of his duties. On October 4, 1898, a commissioner was appointed by the fiscal court to settle his accounts. The settlement was made. Exceptions were filed by the county attorney, which were heard by the court. The settlement was corrected approved, and confirmed by the Green county court and properly recorded. On January 29, 1900, Howard was again duly appointed and qualified as tax collector of the county levy for that year, and on October 2, 1900, a commissioner was appointed by the fiscal court to settle his accounts. The settlement was made April 2, 1901, and was approved on May 13, 1901, and ordered to record. This suit was brought on March 3, 1906, to surcharge these settlements. It was alleged in the petition that in the settlement for 1898 Howard was charged with the valuation of the property as fixed by the assessor, but that the state board of equalization had raised the assessment of the property, and that this fact was overlooked in the making of the settlement. In consequence, he was not charged with the full valuation of the property, which made a difference in the taxes of $293.30. It was also charged that, by mistake, he was not charged with the correct number of polls, the difference amounting to $352.50, and that an item of back taxes collected by him had not been charged to him at the correct amount, making in all $629.26, which by mistake was not charged to him in the settlement. It was alleged that this mistake was not discovered until December 13, 1905, and could not have been discovered before by the exercise of reasonable diligence. Similar allegations were made as to the settlement for the year 1900. The defendant demurred to the petition. His demurrer was sustained, and the county appeals.
Section 4146, Ky. St. 1903, is as follows: Construing this statute in Little v. Strow, 112 Ky. 531, 23 Ky. Law Rep. 1829, 66 S. W. 283, we said: "Under this statute, nobody can file exceptions to the settlements made by the sheriff except the sheriff or the county attorney; but the statute provides that even if the county attorney shall file such exceptions, and they are heard and determined in the county court, he may appeal from the judgment to the circuit court, or actions may be instituted in any court of competent jurisdiction to correct the settlement by any party in interest." Again in Commonwealth v. Pate, 85 S. W. 1097, 27 Ky. Law Rep. 624, we said: The case of Pulaski Co. v. Watson, 106 Ky. 500, 50 S. W. 861, 21 Ky. Law Rep. 61, and Fidelity & Deposit Co. of Maryland v. Logan Co., 119 Ky. 428, 84 S. W. 341, 27 Ky....
To continue reading
Request your trial