Green v. Bennett
Decision Date | 07 April 1908 |
Citation | 110 S.W. 108 |
Parties | GREEN et al. v. BENNETT et al.<SMALL><SUP>*</SUP></SMALL> |
Court | Texas Court of Appeals |
Appeal from District Court, De Witt County; James C. Wilson, Judge.
Action by William Green and another against John M. Bennett and others. From a judgment of dismissal on sustaining a demurrer to the petition, plaintiffs appeal. Affirmed.
Wallace & Wimberly and Denman, Franklin & McGown, for appellants. Prive & Green, Davidson & Bailey, Lackey & Lewright and Proctors, Vandenberge & Crain, for appellees.
This is a suit by William Green and Phillip Welhausen, stockholders in the First National Bank of Yoakum, against J. M. Bennett, Sr., E. B. Carruth, W. T. Brian, B. P. Stephenson, M. V. Arnold, J. M. Green, D. T. Price, the First National Bank of Yoakum, and the Yoakum National Bank of Yoakum, complaining of the action of the individual defendants in placing the First National Bank of Yoakum in voluntary liquidation, and disposing of its assets to the Yoakum National Bank of Yoakum, to the injury of plaintiffs as stockholders in the first-named bank. The court sustained a general demurrer, and certain special demurrers, which, in fact, were in the nature of general demurrers to the petition, and, plaintiffs declining to amend, the cause was dismissed, from which judgment plaintiffs appeal.
The petition is quite lengthy. The following statement, taken from appellants' brief, and admitted by appellees to be accurate, presents, with but slight abbreviation, its essential averments: "The First National Bank of Yoakum is referred to as the `First National' and the Yoakum National Bank of Yoakum as the `Yoakum National.' The First National was incorporated in 1890 with an authorized capital stock of $50,000, divided into 500 shares of $100 each, and ever since the date of its incorporation up to the times thereinafter averred in the petition has been engaged in the banking business in the city of Yoakum. Appellants on or about the 15th day of July, 1899, purchased and became the owners jointly of 55 shares of the capital stock of the First National, and are still the owners and holders of such stock. On or about the 8th day of January, 1907, appellees, other than the First National and the Yoakum National, were elected directors of the First National, and have since continued and still are directors of said First National. On or about the 8th day of January, 1907, appellee Bennett was elected president of the First National, appellee Green, vice president, appellee Carruth, cashier, and appellee Brian, assistant cashier of said bank, and since said time have continued to hold their said offices and still hold same. The First National has continuously been in business from the date of its incorporation and, during said time, built up a valuable and paying business, acquiring large assets, numerous customers, and large deposits from numerous and divers depositors, and, from time to time, out of its earnings, after paying dividends to its stockholders, set aside sundry and divers moneys as surplus, which surplus, on the 10th day of April, 1907, amounted, in the aggregate, to some $65,000, and at said date said bank likewise had a large amount of undivided profits, and was a perfectly solvent banking concern, with assets largely in excess of its liabilities, which solvent condition continued up to the present time. By reason of its large business and large surplus and undivided profits the book value of the stock of the bank continuously increased, and on said 10th day of April was and still is $275 per share, or some such large sum; and the market value of the stock had otherwise continuously increased until, on said date, it amounted to the sum of $400, per share, or some such large sum.
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Grato v. Grato
...79 N.J.Eq. 580, 82 A. 930 (E. & A.1912); Kirwan v. Parkway Distillery, 285 Ky. 605, 148 S.W.2d 720 (Ct.App.1941); Green v. Bennett, 110 S.W. 108 (Tex.Civ.App.1908). But: a question has arisen as to whether a voluntary dissolution, pursuant to a statute, by a majority of the stockholders, is......
-
Wegner v. First National Bank of Casselton
... ... Elizabethtown First Nat. Bank v. Com. 143 Ky. 816, ... 137 S.W. 518; Nat. Bank v. Pennsylvania Fuel Co. 215 ... Pa. 115, 64 A. 374; Green v. Bennett (Tex.; 1908) 110 S.W ... 108; State v. Nat. Bank, 84 Vt. 167, 78 A. 944; ... First Nat. Bank v. Am. Nat. Bank, 173 Mo. 153, 72 ... ...
-
Rossing v. State Bank of Bode
...to that course by a wish to terminate a contract beneficial to the corporation, but onerous to himself. And in Green v. Bennett (Tex. Civ. App.) 110 S. W. 108, that shareholders owning two-thirds of its stock may vote to liquidate the bank, though they are the directors and the executive of......
-
Williams v. Yocum
... ... Merrill Co., 203 F. 16; Ryan v ... Williams, 100 F. 172; Watkins v. Bank (Kans.) ... 32 P. 914; Bowditch v. Co., 82 A. 1014; Green" v ... Bennett, 110 S.W. 108; Smith v. Stone, 21 Wyo ... 62. Plaintiffs' case is barred by limitations, ... §§ 5566-5569 C. S.; 17 R. C. L. \xC2" ... ...