Green v. Fluor Corp.

Decision Date25 May 1954
Citation122 F. Supp. 224
PartiesGREEN v. FLUOR CORP., Limited.
CourtU.S. District Court — Southern District of New York

Michael Koses, New York City, for plaintiff.

Bernard, Remsen, Millham & Bowdish, New York City, by Lewis S. Bowdish, New York City, of counsel, for defendant.

GODDARD, District Judge.

This is a motion by plaintiff to remand this suit to the City Court of the City of New York.

Plaintiff sues for compensation allegedly owing to the plaintiff, arising out of an employment contract. The complaint alleges three causes of action; the first seeks $390.88 for unpaid salary and vacation allowances; the second seeks $2,123.64 for unpaid statutory overtime, liquidated damages and counsel fees, under the Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938, 29 U.S.C.A. § 201 et seq.; the third seeks $865.92 for unpaid overtime.

There is diversity of citizenship and the total recovery sought is $3,380.44. Where the plaintiff has several demands against the defendant which he may join in one action, the aggregate of those demands exclusive of interest and costs is the amount in controversy. Kimel v. Missouri State Life Ins. Corp., 10 Cir., 1934, 71 F.2d 921; Yates v. Whyel Coke Co., 6 Cir., 1915, 221 F. 603; Provident Mutual Life Insurance Co. of Philadelphia v. Parsons, 4 Cir., 1934, 70 F.2d 863.

In addition, it is now clear that the action under the Fair Labor Standards Act may be removed to this court. Korell v. Bymart, Inc., D.C., 101 F.Supp. 185; Asher v. William L. Crow Const. Co., D.C., 118 F.Supp. 495.

Motion to remand denied.

Settle order on notice.

To continue reading

Request your trial
7 cases
  • Chapman v. 8TH Judicial Juvenile Probation Bd.
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — Eastern District of Texas
    • 1 Octubre 1998
    ...Paul Hardeman, Inc., 223 F.Supp. 74 (E.D.Ark. 1963); Buckles v. Morristown Kayo Co., 132 F.Supp. 555 (E.D.Tenn.1955); Green v. Fluor Corp., 122 F.Supp. 224 (S.D.N.Y.1954); Rossi v. Singer Sewing Mach. Co., 127 F.Supp. 53 (D.Conn.1953); Asher v. William L. Crow Constr. Co., 118 F.Supp. 495 (......
  • Roseman v. Best Buy Co., Inc.
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — Southern District of Georgia
    • 16 Abril 2001
    ...Paul Hardeman, Inc., 223 F.Supp. 74 (E.D.Ark.1963); Buckles v. Morristown Kayo Co., 132 F.Supp. 555 (E.D.Tenn.1955); Green v. Fluor Corp., 122 F.Supp. 224 (S.D.N.Y. 1954); Rossi v. Singer Sewing Mach. Co., 127 F.Supp. 53 (D.Conn.1953); Asher v. William L. Crow Constr. Co., 118 F.Supp. 495 (......
  • DeLorenzo v. Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — Southern District of New York
    • 28 Septiembre 1966
    ...Oil Well Cementing Co., 20 F.R.D. 563 (N.D. W.Va.1957); Johnston v. Oregon Elec. Ry., 145 F.Supp. 143 (D.Or.1956); Green v. Fluor Corp., 122 F.Supp. 224 (S.D. N.Y.1954); Louisville & N. R. R. v. United States, 106 F.Supp. 999 (W.D.Ky. 1952), aff'd, 221 F.2d 698 (6th Cir. 1955); 2 Barron & H......
  • Sicinski v. Reliance Funding Corp.
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — Southern District of New York
    • 11 Diciembre 1978
    ...Moss-American, Inc., 309 F.Supp. 1175 (D.Miss. 1970); Rossi v. Singer Sewing Mach. Co., 127 F.Supp. 53 (D.Conn.1953); Green v. Fluor Corp., 122 F.Supp. 224 (S.D.N.Y. 1954); Asher v. William L. Crow Constr. Co., 118 F.Supp. 495 (S.D.N.Y.1953); Korell v. Bymart, 101 F.Supp. 185 In the Court's......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT