Green v. Johnson
Decision Date | 11 February 2008 |
Docket Number | No. 07-9.,07-9. |
Citation | 515 F.3d 290 |
Parties | Kevin GREEN, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Gene M. JOHNSON, Director of the Virginia Department of Corrections, Respondent-Appellee. The American Association on Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities; The Arc of the United States; The Arc of Virginia, Amici Supporting Appellant. |
Court | U.S. Court of Appeals — Fourth Circuit |
ARGUED: Michele Jill Brace, Virginia Capital Representation Resource Center, Charlottesville, Virginia, for Appellant. Matthew P. Dullaghan, Senior Assistant Attorney General, Office of the Attorney General, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee. ON BRIEF: Timothy M. Richardson, Huff, Poole & Mahoney, P.C., Virginia Beach; Virginia, for Appellant. Robert F. McDonnell, Attorney General, Jerry P. Slonaker, Senior Assistant Attorney General, Office of the Attorney General, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee. James W. Ellis, Norman C. Bay, Steven K. Homer, April Land, Carol M. Suzuki, Albuquerque,
New Mexico, for Amici Supporting Appellant.
Before WILKINSON, MOTZ, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by published opinion. Judge SHEDD wrote the opinion, in which Judge WILKINSON joined. Judge MOTZ wrote an opinion concurring in the judgment.
OPINION
Kevin Green, a Virginia capital inmate, appeals the denial of his petition for a writ of habeas corpus. The district court granted Green a certificate of appealability ("COA") on two issues: (1) whether he is mentally retarded so that his sentence is unconstitutional under the Eighth Amendment as interpreted in Atkins v. Virginia, 536 U.S. 304, 122 S.Ct. 2242, 153 L.Ed.2d 335 (2002), and (2) whether his trial counsel rendered ineffective assistance by failing to appeal his non-capital convictions after the first of his two trials. In denying relief, the district court concluded that Green failed to prove he is mentally retarded under Virginia law and that his ineffective assistance of counsel claim is untimely under 28 U.S.C. § 2244(d). For the following reasons, we affirm.
We begin with a summary of the facts pertaining to the underlying crimes, as articulated by the Supreme Court of Virginia:
It was four bangs. Bang, bang and I was hit. I didn't know where I was hit, but I was hurt. I turned a complete turn and fell on the floor, sit [sic] down on my right foot and broke my right ankle. And about [the] time I went down, I looked up and I realized it was a gun being fired. I could see him, he shot toward my wife with the fourth shot. I saw his hand with a pistol in it. He was holding [it] like he was target practicing.
Green v. Commonwealth, 266 Va. 81, 580 S.E.2d 834, 837-39 (2003) ("Green v. Commonwealth II").
In June 2000, Green was convicted of the capital murder of Mrs. Vaughan during the commission of robbery; and of the non-capital crimes of robbery, malicious wounding of Mr. Vaughan, and three counts of illegal use of a firearm. The jury fixed Green's punishment at death for the capital murder conviction; life imprisonment for the robbery conviction; 20 years imprisonment for the malicious wounding conviction; and three years imprisonment for each of the firearms convictions. On October 6, 2000, the trial judge sentenced Green in accord with the jury's verdict. Green's trial counsel appealed his capital murder conviction and death sentence but not his non-capital convictions.
In June 2001, the Supreme Court of Virginia reversed Green's capital murder conviction and death sentence, holding that the trial judge abused his discretion by refusing to remove two potential jurors from the venire based on their lack of impartiality. See Green v. Commonwealth, 262 Va. 105, 546 S.E.2d 446 (2001) ("Green v. Commonwealth I"). The supreme court concluded that one juror had formed a fixed opinion about the punishment Green should receive if convicted of the capital murder, and the other juror had formed a fixed opinion about the case based on pretrial publicity. Although this decision necessitated a new trial on the capital murder charge, it did not affect Green's unappealed non-capital convictions. See id. at 447 () .
Green's retrial occurred in the latter part of 2001, and a jury again convicted him of capital murder during the commission of robbery and fixed his punishment at death. Green's criminal record, including the non-capital convictions and sentences he received at the first trial, was presented to the jury during the sentencing phase of the retrial. In January 2002, the trial judge sentenced Green in accord with the jury's recommendation. In June 2003, the Supreme Court of Virginia affirmed Green's capital murder conviction and death...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Basham v. United States
..."[T]he touchstone of effective representation must be sound, evidence-based judgment." Meyer, 506 F.3d at 371. In Green v. Johnson, 515 F.3d 290 (4th Cir.2008), the Fourth Circuit found that a state supreme court's determination that a petitioner had not established his claim of mental reta......
-
Richardson v. Branker
...15A–2005 for a court to adjust a defendant's I.Q. scores downward for such factors.” 769 F.Supp.2d at 927; see also Green v. Johnson, 515 F.3d 290, 300 n. 2 (4th Cir.2008) (applying Virginia law in reviewing habeas petition and observing that “neither Atkins nor Virginia law appear to requi......
-
Richardson v. Colvin
...standards for measuring adaptive skills in reviewing the denial of a writ of habeas corpus under 28 U.S.C. § 2254. See Green v. Johnson, 515 F.3d 290, 302 (4th Cir. 2008), cert. denied, 128 S. Ct. 2999 (2008) (finding Virginia Supreme Court's determination that the petitioner had failed to ......
-
Hannigan v. United States
...have learned needed information through a public record in assessing "due diligence" under section 2255(f)(4) ); see alsoGreen v. Johnson, 515 F.3d 290, 305 (4th Cir.2008) (analyzing "due diligence" standard in 28 U.S.C. § 2244(d)(1)(D) of the AEDPA and permitting a reviewing court to consi......
-
Review Proceedings
...Court); Philips v. Warden, 908 F.3d 667, 671-72 (11th Cir. 2018) (same). 2928. 28 U.S.C. § 2244(d)(1)(B); see, e.g. , Green v. Johnson, 515 F.3d 290, 304-05 (4th Cir. 2008) (finding impediment when state failed to replace allegedly ineffective counsel); Critchley v. Thaler, 586 F.3d 318, 3......